ITT: use your literary flow to come up with a more edgy phrase than "God is dead"
Can it be done, or was Nietzsche the absolute Edgelord?
It is not worth the bother of killing yourself, since you always kill yourself too late.
>>9248095
What about in the long run we are all dead. For the guys who ever read an economics book which I don't imagine to be that many.
My Godslayer will kill everylast God and Demon out there
Rate my lackluster essay out of Joyce's toilet paper. But for serious, how awful is this?
>handwriting of a child with down's
Stopped right there.
>>9248026
And here I thought my handwriting was pretty neat. Well, too bad I guess.
>>9248014
just print man, your cursive is terrible
How do I achieve the /lit/ synthesis of Marxism and Catholicism?
mental retardation helps a lot
be a gigantic faggot with a pea-sized brain
https://leonardoboff.wordpress.com/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_theology
Just start reading Liberation Theology shit.
>life in a gulag is hard
Yes. Thank you, Aleksandr.
You are welcomed you giga turd
>just say you apostatize, it's not like they can read your mind.
>life in a siberian labor camp is hard
Yes. Thank you, Mr. Dostoyevsky.
>same person, different genitalia
Why is one celebrated, why the other scorned?
One is a Jew.
>>9247922
Reddit tier bait.
>>9247922
>same person
It's obvious that you haven't read either
Was he a good professor? What do we know about his classes? Are there any published first-hand accounts?
>>9247917
is he ironically wearing that shirt?
>>9248458
are you ironically living your life?
>>9247917
>What do we know about his classes
he used his position as an excuse to get as much student pussy as he could.
Has anyone actually read In Search of Lost Time? I'm only 200 pages in and I'm dying of boredom.
>>9247909
We have, it is you that hasn't - at least properly. Don't read it for the plot, read it like you would read Ulysses; because it is really well received, you are going to look for flaws, so matter how good it is you are going to get disappointed. The "flaws" are part of the experience, read the book in a different way.
Read it again.
From the start.
>reading for pleasure
>>9247909
It's supposed to be beautiful. And read slowly. Jeez, you can't speedread it or force yourself to read a lot of it everyday or whenever you don't feel like it, you'll kill it.
Buy a copy if you haven't so you don't need to keep renewing it from the library.
>be me
>meeting up with a female acquaintance
>she invites her friend from the south of england
>before I even sit down, he begins talking about his time at Oxford "university"
>gloats that he now has job in the publishing industry earning 30k a year
>has a smug expression on his face throughout his entire set of diatribes and uneventful anecdotes
>as he's laughing and about to take a sip of his ""gin"" I speak up
>the expression of laughter on his face disappears
>"So you spent 4 (four) years of your life earning a degree in something you could have learned at home?"
>*spills some of his drink as he's putting the glass on the table*
>"How much debt have you incurred...10s (tens) of thousands?"
>*visibly begins to shake almost spilling the remaining gin in his mouth*
>"You know, you could have just spent that time at home with a regular job, saving up money and writing in your free time developing a portfolio or even writing occasional essays, articles or even a book to be sent into a publishing house or newspaper..."
>*sweat begins dripping from his face and he literally begins to shake*
>"I mean, it doesn't really make sense to go to University in this day and age, and you're boasting about it too, how embarrassing. What did you get out of it? A piece of paper that says this guy can hand in cliché essays and 10s (tens) of thousands in debt."
>*his face turns red and he grabs his chest as though he's just had a heart attack*
>"You really think in the future, you'll be of more worth to say, some guy who spent 4 (four) years of his life developing his writing, handing stuff in and developing a concrete portfolio, perhaps even wrote a book?"
>*goes into a state of paralysis and falls onto the ground*
>"Seems to me like you just waited 4 (four) years of your life and gotten into a massive amount of debt and stress for nothing."
>*dies there on the floor*
>"Oh well."
>go to the bank to deposit my royalties check
>mfw
>>9247827
Are you Tao Lin?
>>9247827
Were they at all confused by your saying every number twice?
>>9247844
No, I am self-taught.
What happened?
Leftism
black&white vs digital camera?
All of the people who regurgitate that shit here should get cancer and die. Along with DFW, Neetshoe, Peterson, Harris, "I just read C&P/Catcher" and frog posting retards.
help
please
http://gravitys-rainbow.pynchonwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
>>9248421
thanks thats actually quite helpful
I didnt want to buy a full guide 2 times the size of GR
man, in some parts I really dont understand what the fuck is going on, like he just starts rambling a bunch of weird shit but still haves some kind of coherence, I'm having difficulties following the plot, but the "headspace" some passages create compensates for it
Was Pynchon trying to top Ulysses without going full brekekkekkekekekkke?
Discuss.
Also, tell me your thoughts on meta fiction.
>Is there an author?
What kind of meaningless postmodernist drivel is this
>>9247770
>not an argument
>>9247762
I don't take it into account very often. Take Fahrenheit 451, for example. Bradbury fucked up his own execution and made the book about something else entirely.
Are these books any good?
>>9247732
It's meh... and why would you waste time on meh?
Sanderson's worldbuilding is way overrated, I'll say that much. Good prose, though.
>>9247780
He's also a prude, which makes the story unrealistic and annoying.
My advice: Don't.
Is formal logic really relevant for doing philosophy?
Yes. If you are bad at formal logic, the easiest kind, how do you think you can handle much more complex logic of metaphysics for example
>>9247657
It completely depends on what you're doing.
Most comtinentals don't use it (although pretty much all of them follow rehtoric rules in order to build solid arguments).
Studying formal logic helps you break down arguments and identify fallacies and debate better even if you're more interested in continental style philosophy. I think it is required at most schools for a philosophy major.
What does "dialect" in general mean in philosophy?
I feel like there are as many dialects as there are colors, and I can't honestly describe it.
you mean "dialectic" you goddamn dickbreath retarded motherfucker
>>9247679
I'm sorry. I thought dialect is the process and dialectic would bean like adjective..
Pretentious word for logic
So 80 pages in and I'm bored to tears. Also his affection for his mother is creepy to say the least. Should I continue?
>>9247568
>Should I
ha
>>9247568
>bored while reading in search of lost time
>at one of the most famous parts of the book
I didn't think it was possible to be this plebeian, congratulations OP.
>>9247568
>a child wanting a goodnight kiss is creepy
way to go autismo