This board [1] is the result of a bunch of no good teenyboppers wasting their time [2]. There's this thing that the posters [3] have that will constantly make you wonder what force is at work. It is infested with mice and it likely shows signs of ascariasis [4].
I scrolled through the catalog and came across (sic.) five threads that had no association whatsoever with literature. There is a sort of odd pride I took to self when I noticed an assortment of my face posted as a reaction to other posters [5].
Quite humorous and tickling, yet rather something that is shunned by the masses.
[1] That is, ">>>/lit/catalog," known as "/lit/" by the users.*
[2] Most are college students, likely studying English or philosophy.
[3]* The posters, also known by the unanimous "anons" are various people, dominantley American middle-class white men. The uniqueness of 4Chan is due to the anonymous culture.
[4]: Ascariasis is a disease caused by the parasitic roundworm Ascaris lumbricoides.
[5] A majority of these pictures are directly screenshot from my interviews. Some anons collect rarer pictures of me, hunting for my youth or university times.
>>9255111
Forgot w/r/t
>>9255111
and but so what?
Vic.
Pinpoint the moment when everything went wrong in Western philosophy.
Pic related
unfortunately... relativism. nietzsche was the peak and the descent to madness
>>9255085
the enlightenment
Was it autism?
Yes.
The source of all genius
>>9254985
No, but Mr Collins definitely had autism.
Why does /lit/ overlook pic related?
He's such a part of American culture that he's almost dismissed as the Huckleberry Finn guy but he was an incredible writer. His lectures, the evolution of his work, Letters from the Earth, Joan of Arc...I feel like he's severely underappreciated on here.
Can we have a Sam Clemens general?
>>9254955
He used an inappropriate term in one of his novels. And (((they))) got offended and pushed for his works to be either censored or removed from school entirely. And /lit/ are just (((they're))) puppets. Believing all the vitriol (((they))) spew out.
Every time you see a "/pol/" plz go response, (((they))) have won.
>>9254977
You make the world worse by being alive.
>>9254977
after puberty is done with you you're gonna look back on this and cringe so hard it's gonna feel like a heart attack
Post the latest entry from your diary, desu.
Will post mine in next post.
March 18th, 2017
I saw a boy that looked like him today, it made me sad. It also made me remember the dream I had of him last night, that made me sadder. This dream is one that has been recurring (or, has had a recurring motif) ever since he left. In the dream, he’s always hostile to me, calling me a “weirdo,” a “faggot,” etc. but it was never like this in real life. I deny that what I felt and what I still feel is love, I also deny that he has ever loved me either, but I think I’m attached to him because he was the first person to give me romantic (in reality, sexual) attention and now my conscious thinks it’s true love, which is absurd. I do want him back though, and I here he’ll be coming back for a month in April, but I won’t end up seeing him, I’ll chicken out at the last minute, or my dreams of his hostility will have reflected on me enough to completely avoid him. I wish it wasn’t like this. I wish my feelings for people could be normal.
i often use iphone notes to journal
bump for /lit/ actually writing for once
ITT: post your favourite author and get roasted. Pic related.
>>9254922
Nothing
Flawless author
10/10
>PKD
VALIS
A Maze of Death
Flow My Tears the Policeman Said
A Scanner Darkly
--
>Good
The Divine Invasion
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep
Man in the High Castle
Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch
Ubik
>OK
Martian Time Slip
Dr Bloodmoney
Time Out of Joint
Currently reading Transmigration of Timothy Archer
seriously. Writing like him more and more, whether for good or bad
>>9255022
you and the other 10,000 bourgeois white guys
>tfw you go outside and you're more well-read, refined, and cultured than everyone you meet
Who else knows the burden of being an intellectual here?
>>9254913
May gods hand of judgment be upon you.
18:1aMr 9:33-37; Lu 9:46-48; 22:24
18:3bMt 19:14; 1Pe 2:2
18:3cLu 18:17
18:4d
Pr 15:33 The fear of Jehovah is a training in wisdom, And before glory there is humility.
Mt 20:26 This must not be the way among you; but whoever wants to become great among you must be your minister,
Mt 23:12 Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.
Lu 9:48 and said to them: “Whoever receives this young child on the basis of my name receives me also; and whoever receives me also receives the One who sent me. For the one who conducts himself as a lesser one among all of you is the one who is great.”
Lu 14:11 For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.”
Lu 22:26 You, though, are not to be that way. But let the one who is the greatest among you become as the youngest, and the one taking the lead as the one ministering.
Jas 4:10 Humble yourselves in the eyes of Jehovah, and he will exalt you.
1Pe 5:5 In the same way, you younger men, be in subjection to the older men. But all of you clothe yourselves with humility toward one another, because God opposes the haughty ones, but he gives undeserved kindness to the humble ones.
>>9254916
God doesn't approve of the slovenly, lazy, hedonistic masses. The Lord likely numbers me among his Elect.
Can anyone help me with exploring contemporary literature?
People make fun of me for being out of touch and only reading classics. I do this because I find them a safe bet, reading works that have stood the test of time.
The few contemporary books I've read have been disappointments: Knausgaard gets old fast, Michael Chabon is just plain unremarkable, and Junot Diaz is obnoxious as fuck. I chose those authors only because they're famous, and I don't know how else to discover authors.
I've heard awards are a good portal of discovery, but I don't trust many of them, especially not the fucking Nobel prize (they call it the NObel because you see who won and you say "NO").
>>9254845
You start with the Greeks then you work your way up the canon. The way will become clear by then
>>9254845
Who are these people making fun of you? They're probably plebs and their opinions are worthless.
>>9254845
do NOT apologize for your patrician taste. working your way up to the present day w/out falling for shitty meme authors takes a lot of work, you're doing it the right way
also I keked at your NObel jab. strongly memed
in conclusion, change nothing about what you're doing
>Wrote a book
>It's shit
Anyone ever do this?
>>9254838
I realized my writing was shit long before I finished my book. So I'm not sure which of us is better off.
>Don't write a boot
>It's a masterpiece
Anyone ever do this?
>>9254838
i have done this a couple of times for nanowrimo but it was good practice.
maybe get some of the theory down before writing a whole book
What did you take away from this? With Brothers K, I remember I kept thinking of it for like a week after finishing, but for C&P I just finished with an "oh ok". I can recognize the depth and how well formulated it is, and I can even relate to Raskolnikov, but it just doesn't stay in my mind. I'd like to hear other perspectives.
>>9254825
I read it like 5 years ago, currently rereading it. I mean Brothers K is Dostoevsky's magnum opus, but you can see him formulating his ideas in Crime and Punishment. It's a beautiful work on the moral and philosophical struggle between Nihilism/utilitarianism/rationalism/atheism on the one hand, and religion and Christianity on the other. It was the first book by Dostoevsky I ever read, and it made me want to read more and more. Now he's my favorite author.
When I originally read it I was a bit of an atheist edgelord, but nowadays I'm seeking a deeper moral truth, and meaning in life. I have to attribute that to Dostoevsky.
>>9254839
>tfw Brothers Karamazov was only part 1 of the two part series Dosto planned
>>9254825
>>9254839
Oh and another thing I forgot to mention is that this book helped turn me away from libertarianism. One theme of the book is how poverty leads to crime and moral degradation. Before reading it I might have blamed criminals and blamed the poor for their station in life, but 5 years ago the book got me thinking about the topic more.
>>9254843
I know. Pic related.
>Young William James Sidis was tutored relentlessly from the cradle. He could read English at the age of 3. He amazed everyone around at the age of four when he would use a typewriter to write in English and in French. When he was five, he could already speak five languages. He would read Plato in Greek. At the age of nine he was ready to pass entrance exams to Harvard but was not admitted as not being mature enough for college life. At 11, after three years of trying and being refused on the grounds of his youth, young Sidis entered Harvard. His stardom begun with a lecture about "Four-Dimensional Bodies". After the lecture, Prof. Daniel Comstock of MIT hailed him to be a material for the greatest mathematician of the 20th century. New York Times picked up a story and gave him national prominence.
>you won't be him
jesus.. is writing independent of influence?
>>9254802
>highest iq ever
>that's pretty much all he's known for
js mill and montaigne both had very rigorous upbringings if you want to look into them
>>9254802
Pretty much every prodigy with overbearing parents has had a breakdown of some kind. Go to university at age 12!!! Solve philosophy at age 20!!! Jesus Christ. Has anybody had the philosophy to give kids a rigorous, but attentive and loving childhood so they can be free to do whatever they want with competence in their life? It seems like most of these child prodigies are just made to serve their parents, no wonder they emotionally struggle the way they do.
Ayn Rand seems to be, continually, the most hated author in academia. And why is that? I think it's because she reveals a very bitter truth about the world: that most human beings are unexceptional and replaceable. For someone like me, I actually find this kind of liberating, the general unimportant of us all, but I think most people find this very offensive; they want to feel important. But in true free marker capitalism, society's great innovations and achievements are done by a small number of people. Most people are not essential. The lower you go on the labor chain, the more replaceable you are. Not necessarily anything wrong with that, but most people find this hard to swallow.
Ayn Rand offers a peak into the window of truth: women are the most cold, calculating, self-interested beings on the planet. Unfortunately, most people would rather stay in the cave then see the world as it truly is....
if you write a lengthy reply to this discussion topic you are a poser
She's the equivalent of the average fedora fuck who read the oxford encyclopedia entry on Nietzsche and is TOTALLY understanding of his ideas and how to be the ubermens
She's a delusional hyper-hypocrite whose most accomplished work is a novella she lifted from another dude
I have suffered from depression and mental illness for years. I Just finished reading Plath's 'The Bell Jar'. Was anyone else really moved by this book? I could relate to every line. I could feel her sense of hopelessness, yet find so much beauty at the heart of it. It made me see everything objectively. It was so incredibly cathartic. This reminded me a lot of Catcher in the Rye, although I enjoyed this much more. This is definitely gonna be added to my list of books that changed my life, along with Paul Coelho's The Alchemist and Herman Hesse's Siddhartha.
>>9254667
>Paul Coelho's The Alchemist and Herman Hesse's Siddhartha.
Jesus anon, it's called subtlety, try it sometime.
>>9254683
>you
>knowing subtle
I bet that not even last night's storm could wake you.
>>9254801
"Dark and stormy night"? Jiub... something? No, I don't get it either.
Wow, compared to the movie this made Anakin's change to the Dark Side way more convincing! Palpatine was legitimate as fuck too in this book.
I would want to embrace the Dark Side after reading this novel. I don't disagree ONE BIT with Anakin fucking the Light Side over. It makes complete and utter sense now.
I don't care what you retards think about this novel being genre. I personally think the Star Wars genre ALONE is underrated as fuck!
>>9254621
>good laser sword guys vs bad laser sword guys for a million fucking pages
I would prefer not to.
I remember reading a starwars book as a kid about Bobba Fett going to a planet (I think Dagobah)
IT was really cool and creepy, and the people there ended up being cannibals who tried to eat him.
If anybody got a name Id love to know
>>9254714
Whoa. You seem really cool and smart for some reason.
It's a fact that most people's attention span these days have gone down the shitter. For some people its impossible to read books because they will inevitably get distracted by phone/video games/internet bullshit that has instant gratification. How does one combat this? I'm not quite as bad as people who won't even pick up books, but I can only read like a chapter a day and then I have to stop no matter how interesting the book.
>>9254618
I'll say the same thing I always say in threads like these.
1. Pick something you genuinely want to read, not something that you're only reading for meme value. It's amazing how many people, when getting into reading, just pick up whatever books 4chan tells them to read rather than choosing for themselves. Of course if you're not going to be focus if you don't care about what you're reading.
2. Go someplace away from your computer to read. Go to a quiet peaceful place like a park or a library. Change of environment really helps. In the book The Shallows (essential reading for people struggling with this problem), there was mentioned a study that people had better attention spans when walking through a nature filled area rather than a noisy city. Even thinking about nature helped their attention spans.
>>9254618
Just put a timer on and sit down with a book until its up. I think its less about tricking your will power as just drawing a clear boundary and aim around the activity.
>>9254618
Self control. Consciously choose to not use the computer. Set time goals ie. I will read for the next 60 minutes, it doesn't matter if I make any progress with the book, I'm not allowed to do anything else. Stick to this.