about soldiers who are stationed at an outpost, waiting for an attack which never happened. Forgot the title. Halp plox.
pic not related
The Tartar Steppe?
>>9479533
The Tartar Steppe - Dino Buzzati
>>9479533
Le Rivage des Syrtes/The Opposing Shore - Julien Gracq
spookily similar to Buzatti's work, by the by.
>read book
>too many obscure words every paragraph
how do you even do it?
>>9479470
By reading more.
>look the words up in the dictionary
>definition contains too many obscure words
>look the words up in the dictionary
>definition contains too many obscure words
>look the words up in the dictionary
>>9479470
I tried to not have vocabulary of a 10 year old and succeeded. Now everyone hates me for talking more literate than they ever could.
Tread carefully when expanding your vocabulary.
Who will play him in the biographical drama?
>>9479441
He is lecturing, lecturing. He says he will never die.
>>9479486
He and Kissinger are immortal do to their evil
>>9479611
>chomsky
>evil
u wot m8
ITT: Books you want to read but can't because they don't exist
Bad film.
>>9479419
April March by Herbert Quain
I thought you guys liked this guy. Why were you fooling around the whole time?
>>9479298
No, you didn't.
Go back to where you came from.
Lean in, I'll let you in on a secret....
Ready?
We all love the guy, but we pretend we don't! Don't tell anyone!
>>9479447
fuck off john
Fantasy
Selected:
>http://i.imgur.com/pk3og4Y.jpg
General:
>https://i.imgur.com/igBYngL.jpg
Flowchart:
>https://i.imgur.com/uykqKJn.jpg
Science Fiction
Selected:
>https://i.imgur.com/A96mTQX.jpg
>https://i.imgur.com/IBs9KE8.jpg
General:
>https://i.imgur.com/r55ODlL.jpg
>https://i.imgur.com/gNTrDmc.jpg
NPR's Top 100 Science Fiction & Fantasy Books:
>https://i.imgur.com/IJxTQBL.jpg
Previous Threads:
>>9473163
>>9455435
>>9442315
>>9431124
>>9421255
>>9479251
fuck forgot title. I'm never doing this again. a mod should delete this
Why the fuck did the other thread get deleted
I made this one, but I discarded the previous threads so we will nuke the ones with the altered selected chart
>>9479905
if mods dont like it they can delete it too
What's the evangelion of literature ?
motorman
Revelation
A lot of Evangelion's ideas are lifted directly from Childhood's End. However, in the field of anime Evangelion is kind of considered postmodern while Childhood's End is considered middle brow or possibly even low brow as sci fi tends to be in the world of literature.
What do geniuses read, /lit/?
>>9479162
geniuses don't read, they eat pizza and go to the forum
my diary okii desu
>>9479162
Nothing, for they derive all meaning and knowledge from their own musings.
I read TCoL49 and it was one of the worst books I have ever read, but it has been a year and I am ready to give Pynch another shot by attempting Gravity's Rainbow. Am I wasting my time?
if you felt that way about TCoL49 you probably will not like Gravity's Rainbow, which is like a beefier better version of the same sort of novel
>or is he just a meme like DFW?
you also seem like a meme man so i doubt you're smart enough to even enjoy Pynchon
>>9479134
Every author that you don't enjoy is actually a meme and an elaborate ruse by the /lit/ board of 4chan to get you to read bad novels in stead of reading what is actually of high quality.
>>9479134
If you didn't like Lot 49, you won't like Gravity's Rainbow. No need to discuss his "meme" status, which is irrelevant to whether or not he is a good writer (he is).
Where is a good place to start? I have never really taken to books. Can't remember the last time I read one that wasn't a school related obligation. I honestly don't know where to start. I'm into the occult and related fields, but also looking to find interest in other areas.
START
WITH
THE
Was at Goodwill, found Don Quixote for $ 0.99.
What should I expect?
Seriously, I don't know what it's even about. I just know it's in the canon of classic literature and it's about a knight or something maybe.
>>9479045
just go into it in ignorance. please.
Translation might be an issue if you're reading in English. There are several, and a bunch are stilted and difficult to read because they're from the 19th century or early 20th.
The most recent one is Edith Grossman and it's generally considered good, because it's extremely readable and preserves the colloquial and easy-going style of Cervantes. If you're reading along in something that seems dry, arid, stuffy, or just plain difficult to read without fading in and out, you might consider getting the Grossman as a full-price paperback instead.
>What should I expect?
It's an easy and very fun book to read and the first half especially will breeze by, especially if you're using the Grossman translation. It won't make you want to kill yourself. It's also one of the most important books in the history of literature for a variety of reasons, so it's a good one to read. It's kind of like reading Faust, Hamlet, or Homer.
>>9479064
This made me excited to read it. Thanks.
Although I just checked. The translation is by John Rutherford. Know anything about that one?
>read 1984
>losing hope in change
>eyes open
>nothing else to read
are you ignorant or immature?
>>9478995
angsty teenager
now read BNW
Why is Lovecraft so popular in the mainstream Geek culture?
>>9478923
Because they're manchildren obsessed with Le spooky stories.
>>9478923
btw it's actually good
It does seem like pretty much everyone dabbling in horror has riffed on Lovecraft or his work.
This is so hype that it hurts
>>9478758
>fagles
F
>>9478760
Is fagles the best translator for the english version
t. portuguese speaker
the iliad is the bomb diggy u feel me duke we come with that 90s tonite mother fucka
no but for real tho
I could use some advice on when and when not to use passive voice. I realize that my sample has other flaws, but I would mainly like some advice on the use of passive voice in it, and how to fix it.
The room was a display of Man. The multifarious forces and objects were held together by an anthropocentric will to exert control over all perceived disparity: the same will that is omnipresent in all echelons of human society; which drove Caesar with the same force that drove Alexander.
There was the grandfather clock, mimicking the incorrigible and and darkly rhythmic march of Time: the march which mowed over Rome and razed Paris just to move towards that Zenonian endpoint—infinitely unattainable yet ostensibly quantified—with unflagging and unfeeling insistence; there was the television—the ultimate symbol of of twenty first century, ennui-fueled vanity and tempered frustration which, besides acting as a symbolic expression of the unconscious, served as material relief from a material world; and then there was the dog, which, as a result of its diminished canine proclivity for domination and savagery—which had been attenuated through years of human interference—thrashed an old sock around behind the TV.
>>9478706
"Write in the active voice" is a meme. For the most part, the way people usually write in the passive voice is fine. There are certainly instances where it detracts, but for the most part it's fine.
As far as the passive voice is concerned, your use of it here seems to be okay.
>>9478788
Alright. I appreciate it. The passive voice thing has always been in my ears, so I was worried.
>>9478880
The general rule is, that the passive voice tends to make writing sound sneaking, like taking blame off someone or something. Like you're writing in a sort of political blame-shifting type of voice. The passive voice will give more focus to the object than to the subject of the sentence. Use active when you specifically want to make the subject the focus of the reader's attention, which usually makes sense. It is the subject which acts upon the object in a sentence, so it often makes more sense for the subject to come first.