WE HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO LOVE AND BE HAPPY WITH WHO EVER THAT

SHITPOSTING IN ALL CAPS.

YAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSS PREACH

File: 1502932481847.png (124KB, 415x485px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 415x485px

hmmm....

>>8742000

I get the hamfisted point you're trying to make, but explain something to me:

MLK statues are erected to venerate the man who fought for equal rights and racial equality, while tolerating the fact that he was an adulterer and a homophobe.

Confederate statues are erected to venerate... what?

>>8742000
I don't support gay marriage but this man's homophobia is beyond that. Signed.

>>8742180
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Cause_of_the_Confederacy

TL;DR: Southern confederate widows and sore losers living in the Jim Crow era promoting historical revisionism in order to manufacture social acceptance for their bigotry and treason.

>>8742180
>Confederate statues are erected to venerate... what?
States' rights you ignoramus.

>>8742263
States' rights to allow people to purchase slaves within their borders, to browbeat the federal government to chase down runaway slaves even in the North, and to beat people in Congress with a cane.

>>8742263
Specifically the states' right to allow slavery

>>8742273
>to browbeat the federal government
I'm crying tears for the Fed right now, I really am.

>>8742292
Those feds better get back here with my uppity nigger! ON THE DOUBLE!

>>8742274
You mean to secede.

Quit yelling

>>8742326
*because of slavery
It's slavery.

>>8742356
Wrong.

>>8742370
t. why can't I own niggers today waaaaah

>>8742370
How?
Explain to me how the South's secession wasn't about slavery

>>8742326
Go read the declarations of causes and see how many times "slave" or "slavery" appears

>>8742000
ok /pol/

>>8742380
Strawman.

>>8742418
So you're saying you admit the south's succession was about slavery?

>it's another "anon doesn't know how to use logical fallacies and thinks they're an i win button" episode

>>8742000
YAS THE QUADS CHECK EM

>>8742421
Nope. Try not making up what you wish I said.

>>8742455
>it's another "anon doesn't know how to debate and thinks statements qualify as arguments" episode

I expect a no you after this post too. You people couldn't argue a gun away from being pointed at your first born son's head.

>>8742465
>still making up what he wishes I'd said because he still has no reply to what I did