Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 1492842350286.jpg (203KB, 1643x875px) Image search:
[Google]
203KB, 1643x875px
hi. First time on this board, I come from /pol/ where people are fighting over if traps are gay or not, while simultaneously hating 'muh degeneracy'.
Anyway, I think I might be bi. I've always been an openly emotional, somewhat effeminate kind of guy. I don't mean in the lisp or transgender kind of way, just that I always felt more gentle than most people around me, despite being in decent athletic shape. I've always loved girls, but at the same time, about 40-60% of the time, I don't -feel- like I want to penetrate them. At first I refuted the idea of being gay or bi because when I looked at men, I didn't feel that kind of overwhelming lust that I felt for women usually. But then I came to realize that my attraction to men was more about them lusting after ME, and not the other way around. so, I wanted to know if any of the guys on here who are into guys, feels that way, or if I'm just weird. what I mean is that my attraction to girls and my attraction to guys is totally the opposite. should I be attracted to them the same?
> note, I've kissed guys before, so I'm not just blindly curious
thanks in advance (:
>>
You might be gay friend, stop watching porn and your sexuality will normalize then see who you're attracted to
T. Gay former /pol/ack
>>
>>8196436
Some people believe that male sexuality is externalized, and female sexuality is internalized. There may be a part of yourself that desires to be desired. That's internalized. And you're not going to find a lot of women who objectify you, unfortunately. Or even provide a sensual experience in which you are the focal point, right. So that's something to think about. If you want that in your life, it'll be easier to find in another man.
>>
>>8196468
> you're not going to find a lot of women who objectify you
):
I think I got the answer then! That first line makes a lot of sense...it feels really really internalized for me. I can be externalized too at times, but it's more like a rush of passion for a few minutes, then it passes.
>>
>>8196464
good idea. also um, speaking of porn...I think what the other anon said makes a lot of sense, in that I can only really watch porn of girls since they're the ones being objectified, but for me, gay porn does almost nothing unless it's a POV or something. sorry to get into the details, but I'm gonna take your advice
(: ty
>>
>>8196436
>I always felt more gentle than most people around me, despite being in decent athletic shape.
Unrelated
You may be desensitised towards men sexually for whatever reason (porn maybe) but still crave affection in some way.
I'd suggest doing as >>8196464 said and stop watching porn for a while.
The question is, do you feel like you could be attracted to men in a romantic way?
>>
>>8196436
>the green pill man
this is hilariously obvious esoteric wizardry propaganda
Gnosism is not the only (nor best as the image implies) opposition to "illumination". The globalists also believe in self godhood. gnostics are bringing in the 5th age and pretending it's not all satanism.
Facism is directly against "illumination" until it goes pegan and become lucifarian as well. Hitler was against the jews because they're the new world order race/religion.
As if we're meant to tamper with spirit worlds and call dangerous demons into our minds. While it's not satan worshiping it's following the same "do what thou wilt" philosophy.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1