How does on attain a vaguely religious pol-tier christian femboy bf/trap gf?
>>6851084
>vaguely religious
easy, I'd say most people are that nowadays, rather than strictly a fedora tipper or fundie
>pol-tier
visit the daytime equivalent of gay bars. make sure it's for people above lower middle class. Either that or a rally or comedy show about "telling it like it is"
>femboy/trap
be a top
This is my sage advice
well im not christian but im all the other things. Well I'm not NOT christian, it's definitely the most powerful "talisman", keyword talisman in the world. but I browse pol on the daily and I'd love to suck your cock, want to pay for my monthly waxings?
I'm not religious at all but I'm red pilled on most fronts, very anti SJW and Islam
>>6851271
>well im not christian but im all the other things. Well I'm not NOT christian, it's definitely the most powerful "talisman", keyword talisman in the world.
You literally couldnt possibly get more vaguely religious
>>6851271
Let's do it bae. Where you live?
>>6851378
in this great state right here
>>6851418
Unfortunately I live in Cancuckida
>>6851418
color me surprised
>>6851453
of course you do, I'm on the internet.
>>6851457
yeha bro? you got something to say about mississippi?? i will end you bro
>>6851472
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Mfw 4chan doesn't post my posts
>>6851484
ok you got me there
>>6851460
Tfw no one ever lives in this pozzed up wasteland
>>6851501
>>6851501
Worse, you could be in gayrope
But I'm more for a manly /leftypol/ bf
>>6851527
>/leftypol/
Absolutely degenerate.
>>6851558
Not really, I'm pretty conservative-ish on some issues
I just want the workers to be freed, and equality between peoples, is that too much to ask ?
>>6851569
Lemme know when you can git gud into fascism
>>6851573
>fascism
Pleb ideology
>>6851589
The ideological underpinnings of fascism are only "weak" if you begin to exclude everything that isn't "muh Nazi :(".
If you understand fascism only through the writings of those critical about it, it's no surprise that you end up considering it an inferior ideology to socialism or capitalism - rather than a syncretic system that accounts for the benefits and weaknesses of both.
>>6851663
I've red commented extracts of Mein Kampf. I believe that shit is badly written on purpose. For all the hate you have on Communism, Marx & Hegel spent years debating and talking about a coherent framework for their ideology and called it "dialectical materialism". Nazism is based on racial theory (debunked for ages) and "Everything is the Jew/Arab fault". As said in the picture, it's a set of loose bottom-feeder "arguments" vaguely put together with national myths and identities.
It's no surprise than fascist regimes were corrupted to the core and notoriously inefficient in everything that wasn't war-oriented. Look up how Goering lived for examples. Less jarring, Hitler never had a single cabinet meeting and discouraged his ministers from meeting and cooperating with each other.
I'm all for syncretic policies - as I said, I'm a bit conservative on some issues - but Fascism, be it the Italian or German version, is simply inefficient and inhumane.
>>6851663
By the very same laws of power that fascist leaders loved to talk about, fascism has proven itself to be a failure.
>>6851712
Did I suggest you read Mein Kampf? No, because it's poorly written and concerned more with racialism than with economics.
Now as far as regimes go - if we are to accept the proposition that fascism is inherently bad because Hitler and Mussolini lost the war then we might as well accept the failure of socialism because it lost the Cold War. The inefficiency in Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy can be attributed to human error and a misinterpretation of fascist principles for personal largesse.
Fascism is not an ideology that fits in a neat little box like Trotskyism. It's ultimately an umbrella of differing interpretations of the basic principles, and obviously some interpretations aren't going to work out.
As for inhumanity - this is a personal value judgement probably based around some concept of the free organization of labor and unions, which ought to be prevented because it creates class consciousness and inefficiencies in industry.
>>6851723
Nice try, but no. If we are to assume this is some dick measuring game fascism succeeded in nearly defeating the entire world when arrayed against it. The power projection of fascist states exceeded those of capitalist ones individually.
>>6851755
Is there any other book of theory of facsim other than Mein Kampf ? Serious question here. Even Rosenberg books were not accepted by his party.
>It's ultimately an umbrella of differing interpretations of the basic principles, and obviously some interpretations aren't going to work out.
Though racialism and othering is key to this ideology.
>>6851891
Racialism isn't innate to facism. You are thinking of nazism.
>>6851891
Splenger's "Prussianism and Socialism" is considered a precursor to German National Socialism.
Otto and Gregor Strasser pushed for a more worker based "Strasserism" - and Otto wrote prolifically even after the end of Hitler's Germany.
Mosca's "The Ruling Class" is one of the inspirations for Mussolini's Italian Fascism.
I could go on, but like any other movement fascism has more roots and more literary expressions than Mein Kampf. Hitler's writings ought to he understood not as the perfected final product but rather as just another permutation in an overarching ideological family.
As far as racialism goes - I'm not going to deny the racialism and social Darwinism that feeds into fascist thought. But it's not the required end product either. Neither Francoist Spain nor Fascist Italy were over concerned with race per se. The nation is what drove their othering concerns, and is little different than the othering that socialism promotes when it comes to class consciousness.