I've known a few guys who only do gay shit cause it's kind of taboo. It's hard to tell if they would be gay/bi without societal influence.
It goes without saying almost that the idea of it being forbidden is a turn on for many, but would it be fair to say that for some it's the only reason they engage in homosexual activity?
>>6730649
I think that now that's it gone out of style chasers should claim the "transsexual" lable
>>6730649
>Does sexuality equal fetish in some cases?
It does in most if not all of them.
Not being hetero is a choice since you subconsciously make when you notice that your same gender is more welcoming and seek comfort with them. This counts as giving in to your desires and is, in most religions, sin. We're all probably going to hell.
>>6730763
That english is shit and I'm not going to fix it.
>>6730763
If I subconsciously make a choice, it's not something I chose, it's something my mind chose without me having a say. For example, topically enough, if I gawk at a mans ass in public, more often than not I've already done so without even realizing it.
I'm talking about it being a fetish to someone who truly might not be attracted to the same sex.
When someone who has a fetish of being ticked might not be sexually attracted to feathers, but enjoys the use of feathers during sex.
Someone with the fetish of a taboo relationship might not be directly attracted to the same sex, but would have gay sex solely because of his/her fetish.
Also god is fake.