self-identifying

>>6721404
No idea what the highlighted means.
I draw the line at anything where you identify as more than one gender. Just put "other" and then a place for them to say. No need for them to make it complicated for the tiny tiny amount of people that don't identify as male or female.

File: 345345.png (337KB, 372x408px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 372x408px

>>6721404
it's means that she's another extremely retarded """""genderqueer""""" person who thinks that acting in a way that's usually socially associated the opposite sex LITERALLY means that's you're changing from a girl to a boy, and vice versa.

These people usually try to posit themselves as gender non-conforming, but in reality they accept the false notion that gender roles and gender norms are dictated by biology (hence her stupid fucking use of the nonsensical 'trans-masculine' phrase) instead of society.

She's a girl who's convinced herself that women could never act masculine (whatever that means) and thus she has to literally transition into a man, or imply she has a "man's brain" (not real by the way) to do it.

I hate these people.

>>6721404
After reading the whole thing, I think it means she's female and has zero intentions of transitioning but wants to present male and is attempting to and acting how she thinks men asks. So trans without the trans part. A literal transtrender. Transman would imply a desire to transition into a man, trans masculine then means a desire to be more masculine... but not stop being a female.

Which is obviously not being trans but just doing what she wants and giving social norms the finger. Which is fine, but not fucking trans.