>Look over at 11-year-old brother while he's on his phone

looking at porn at 11 is completely normal retard

>>6668384
blackmail him with it and make him convince mommy to buy him (you) video games

>>6668391
Okay, I'm just unfamiliar with this stuff. I started watching porn when I was 16 with the knowledge that porn was legal for minors and I thought most other people did the same.

>>6668384
Maybe, but it's not really your prerogative to control his sexual interests. As long as nothing has any actual negative behavioral effects, I would say just monitor the situation and leave him be.

>>6668408
Are you retarded? 16? That's late as fuck, depending on when you were born.
If I had porn on my phone when I was his age, I'd be watching 24/7 back then.

>>6668384

Yeah, you should be more concerned.

Studies show young boys/girls who look at porn between the ages of 1-12yo, end up becoming criminals (pedos, murderers, thieves, etc.) and usually end up with a baby, std, hiv by the the time they're 20. Most blacks/latinos are introduced to sex between those years and that's why they're so messed up.

>>6668610
Fuck off with your fear-mongering that is an entirely misleading statement

>>6668610
And what if it's reverse casualty? That the type of children who grow up to be delinquents are more prone to these behaviours rather that these behaviours making them delinquents?

It's not a good argument.

>>6668614

Hey fuckwit.... listen up.

Even if young children can’t understand sex or its role in relationships, the images they see can leave a lasting impression. Although research is just beginning to assess the potential damage of pornography on kids/teens, there is reason to believe that early exposure to sexual content may have the following undesirable effects:

1. Early Sex: Research has long established that kids/teens who watch movies or listen to music that glamorizes drinking, drug use, violence, sex tend to engage in those behaviors themselves. In one study, young boys & girls who were exposed to sexually explicit media were three times more likely to engage in oral sex and intercourse two years after exposure than non-exposed boys. Research also shows that kids/teens who listened to music with degrading sexual references were more likely to have sex before the legal age of consent than those who had less exposure.

2. High Risk Sex: The earlier a child is exposed to sexual content and begins having sex, the likelier they are to engage in high-risk sex. Research shows that children who have sex by age 13 are more likely to have multiple sexual partners, engage in frequent intercourse, have unprotected sex and use drugs or alcohol before sex which increases the risk of them catching sexually transmitted diseases.

3. Sex, Love and Relationship Addictions: Research shows that early exposure to pornography is a risk factor for sex addictions and other intimacy disorders.

4. Sexual Violence/Rape: According to some studies, early exposure (by age 14) to pornography may increase the risk of a child becoming a victim of sexual violence, taking their frustration out on a child and having pedophile tendencies.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/real-healing/201208/overexposed-and-under-prepared-the-effects-early-exposure-sexual-content

I don't know.
Personally, I didn't start looking at porn until like nineteen or twenty.

From what I hear though, overdosing on porn really will kill his bits. Maybe if it seems like a real whole bunch of it, you confront him. Not to tell him to stop, but to go a little lightly on it.

>>6668610
That's likely causality.
I'd argue that it would be more likely caused by being raised in shit conditions.
In fact, if studies prove it, post them. I doubt they exist, and if they do, they probably use defective reasoning, but I'm willing to be surprised.

>>6668633

Psychological studies and research studies prove what I'm saying. You're all fucked up on LGBT due to most likely being exposed to porn and shit at young age, if you weren't already being sexually abused by someone in the first place. None of you are "normal" on here and need serious psychological help.

File: olympics.jpg (165KB, 717x586px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 717x586px

>>6668610
>>6668658
>Studies
Made by Utah and South Korea, no?

>>6668658
I'm >>6668633 and this is a much better argument.
I'm curious as to whether these studies, in particular 2 and 4, were cross-sectional or longitudinal studies, as this would have a significant bearing on the correlation between porn exposure and their behaviors.

/stats nerd/

>>6668658
But that's missing the real problem. Let's say that porn DOES cause early sex. (And that this is bad for some reason) Risky sex is a problem with the practically non-existent, and parentally contingent sex Ed in this country.
Just parenting problems all round. Parents don't know their kids can get into porn, don't know how to check. They don't want to check even. They'd rather imagine their little baby as pure and innocent, and wait to have talks about rape and sexuality until it is too late.

It's not porns fault. It's our culture of repression and ignorance.
Sex is a force unto itself. If 12 year olds can't get condoms, they're not going to say 'Oh, well' it's too powerful and impulse. Shit like that needs to be provided, or we can't complain. (Especially when kids are hitting puberty younger now)

>>6668695

It doesn't take a genius to know that exposing CHILDREN to SEX & disgusting GAY PORN at an early age doesn't do any good for them! CHILDREN often repeat what they see and they will end up exposing other children to what they saw on the internet in those gay porn videos they watched.

Are you this fucking stupid to not know that? You must be. God, I hope you never become a parent you stupid fuckwit.

>>6668707
>Just parenting problems all round. Parents don't know their kids can get into porn, don't know how to check. They don't want to check even. T

Any decent parent knows the internet is a porn haven and would have the proper computer/cellphone program to prevent their kids/teens from seeing such shit.

I'm 22 and I block all porn websites because they're disgusting and should be illegal and banned.

>>6668610
>>6668658

I looked at porn when I was 1-12yo and I'm not a criminal, I can't give birth, I have no stds, I didn't have sex until after the age of consent and I'm 20, so...

>>6668707
good post

>>6668719
And what is wrong with that exactly? At least the children are educating each other, you wouldn't get the same in a school.

>>6668719
Yeah, no. It's not that simple.
And, as I've said above, if we were honest with ourselves about sex; made sexual information, birth control, disease control, information about consent TOTALLY available for kids to access without needing to go through their parents, 'early' sex wouldn't even be a problem

>>6668719
You'd be (or likely are) a way more godawful parent. Your paranoid and controlling helicopter parenting will inevitably suck dry your children's creative and intellectual freedom.

I'm not advocating showing porn to children, I'm saying that correlation does not imply causation when you don't adequately control the sampling of your population.

And there's nothing wrong with being gay asshole.

while i don't think its unusual for children to casually wonder about sex (and by extension, porn), it's a little troubling that he seems to be habitually watching quite a bit of porn, and i think that societies attidues towards gay people can make him quite a bit more vulnerable to predators if he's doing that. i think someone might need to talk to him about this and how to talk to an adult if he's being abuse or someone tries to take advantage of him in the future.
i would recommend against saying stuff like "it's okay if you're gay" because kids can and will pick up that you mean that being gay is negative but you're willing to overlook that.
also regardless of what you do he's probably not going to really trust you anymore, but his safety is more important i think. try to be as non-judgemental as possible.

>>6668707
>It's not porns fault.

Multiple studies done by people much smarter than you & me prove otherwise.


>it's a culture of repression and ignorance

Nope. This is what the LGBTQPA community loves to spread around. Nothing good has come out of the influential media sexualizing everything and exposing kids to sexual things at a younger age. None of you are parents and obviously don't know how to raise a child properly since your parents obviously sucked at parenting you properly.

>>6668738
>I looked at porn when I was 1-12yo and I'm not a criminal, I can't give birth, I have no stds, I didn't have sex until after the age of consent and I'm 20, so...

Let me guess you're a mentally ill tranny or a sex-addicted faggot. Right? Yeah I know I'm right you stupid slut.

>>6668761

Someone needs to talk to him before he offers to give a handjob or oral to his elementary school teacher or ask some adult figure to fuck him in the ass.

>>6668732
Dude, no, they really don't. Maybe after my generation starts to have children, that will change, but parents are HORRIBLY ignorant of technology.
My mother sort of tried to use AOL parental blocks, but they were very easy to get around at the time. The only thing keeping me from watching videos back then was my terrible internet connection, but I still got into a lot of porn, and because my mother assumed she had her bases covered with me, she never talked to me about porn or unrealistic expectations, or any of it.
I think I handled it fine, but I never had to opportunity to use any misinformation I might have gathered.

>>6668738
Problem is that the Internet is the new 'playground'. Literally yesterday on YouTube I ran into someone saying that the safest method of sex is to use both a male and female condom, because it's 'double the protection'. Obviously, that's asking for breakage, but if you're young and horny, and have the social status to be engaging in sex, you're probably not gonna be big on fact checking.
It's important we don't leave it to kids to find this information out for themselves.
Most kids aren't gonna look for lewds in medical books, they're gonna go to porn or whatever today's generation uses in place of Yahoo Answers.

I can't believe you people are condoning a 11yo looking at a gay porn. WTF IS WRONG WITH ALL OF YOU? If you condone young kids who aren't even teenagers yet looking at PORN you're a pedophile piece of shit and are supporting pedophiles. Pedophiles love when kids are exposed to sex at a early age. It makes them more willing to want to be improperly touched by an adult. Sickos!

>>6668770
Neither of those things. But if you believe that "mental illness" can be caused by porn then I'm sorry you watched porn at such a young age...

>studies prove
okay!

>later in the thread
>still no studies posted
are you fucking serious?

>>6668762
Again, I'm not saying I love thinking about eight year olds watching HD jizz guzzling, but I'm saying that it's just not porns fault, not solely. Our culture is obviously very sexual, and yet when it comes to information, were Puritans.
It's like leaving a loaded gun out on Little Johnnys bed, knowing its there, and being too embarrassed to teach him how to not shoot himself in the fucking face.
Do you honestly believe that quality education, not dependent on parental permission, wouldn't help to counteract the problems we have now?

Keep in mind, I live in the United States.
We can legally teach misinformation in our schools.

>>6668795

>mental illness can be caused by porn

It can if you habitually watch porn and become an addict.
I can only imagine how many kids now are going to grow up to be mentally ill freaks due to being exposed to sex and porn at a young age.

>>6668792
What's a 12 year old, a 6th or 7th grader? That's really not that young to be touching yourself in earnest for the first time. It's the porn that really freaks people out, because it's so new, but you mean to tell me you didn't start getting interested in yourself around that age? It just so happens that porn is freer and easier to see and hide than ever before.
Rather than be creeped out by a sexual child, remember back to when you were a sexual child, accept that it is a fact, man the fuck up, and make sure you have that talk with your kid BEFORE you think he needs it.

>11yo boy watches gay porn
>11yo boy becomes addicted to the rush and naughtyness of watching something he knows he shouldn't be watching
>11yo boy starts masturbating and is wow'ed by how it feels
>11yo boy tries to get his friends to do sexual stuff with him like he say in gay porn
>11yo boy is having a great time hooking up with all the neighborhood boys
>11yo boy ends up getting bored after trying everything with the young boys, and wants to try it with an adult who has a bigger dick so he finds grindr.
>11yo boy pretends to be 18 and tried to get guys to come and see him
>11yo boy gets raped by older pedo on grindr
>older pedo had hiv but he doesn't know it
>11yo boy can't tell his parents what happened
>11yo is a sex addict and goes about sleeping with more boys in his neighborhood
>everyone gets hiv

Yep..this is what is going to happen to this kid.

>>6668614
Haven't you ever watched Kids?

>>6668778
well, its also entirely possible that an adult or friend showed him twink porn or something to convince him it was normal.
even if he's just watching it bc he found it on his own and enjoys it, i think he needs to have it explained to him that its not real life. growing up with porn as what you expect sex to be like will probably not end up positively for him, even if thats a best case scenerio.

>>6668384

You should have a talk with your brother. Are you also gay? How old are you? Maybe you should show him the ropes...teach him to be a good boy Anon.

>>6668809
plenty of cultures have had single room dwelling for thousands of years


>little kids hear their parents fuck at night

i dont think its anything to worry about unless its like a *lot* of gay porn

>>6668896
Do you remember what was completely lacking in Kids? Parental supervision and lack of correct sexual information.

>>6668922
Yeah, I'm in agreement with you, retard.
I'd still have some sort of talk with my brother, though, had it been me, just in case he's actually gay. Maybe try to get him to tell me. Ask him if there's any boys or girls he likes at school.

File: i'm.just.saying.gif (528KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 320x180px

>>6668384
>spying on people
>learn something shocking
>"wot do?!"

stop spying on people, dumbass

>>6668957
If he found a needle under his bed, would you feel the same way? I don't think porns a big deal, but it obviously shocked OP, and he's coming at it from a place of goodwill and concern, nigger.

>>6668922

>plenty of cultures have had single room dwellings for thousands of years

and? that doesn't mean the parents were having sex right in front of their children or exposing them to it. The parents would more often than not have sex when the kids were sleeping or not there.

Once again another poster trying to justify a 11yo boy looking at gay porn as being perfectly normal and healthy.

Seriously..you people just keep proving how mentally ill you are. Your beliefs are fucked.


>>6668957
>stop spying on people, let them do what they want

That's why pedos and murderers and rapists get away with shit, when people don't care enough to report strange noises at night and people screaming. Just mind your own business!

>>6668986
>I said it was bad, so it is!
Prove to me what is bad about watching porn that couldn't be solved with a truthful heart to heart and free birth control. Prove to me that 'gay porn' is bad.

>>6668892
I don't think that's ever happened, but nice fantasy, pedo

>>6669000

>Prove to me watching porn is bad!
>Prove to me gay porn is bad!


Gay pornography promotes violence and the sexual degradation of others along the lines of gender. Many sexualized large, hyper-masculine man, many of whom are described as "straight" men who are sexually aroused by inflicting pain on sexual subordinates (read: gay men) who, in turn are described as enjoying the pain, humiliation, and degradation to which they are subjected. This is the most common theme amongst gay porn.

Frequently, sexual subordination is enforced through extreme forms of torture and violence, with masculinity again epitomized and celebrated in men who ridicule and emasculate others in the name of sexual pleasure. Humor, we are told, is found in the sexual debasement of another, assertiveness tied to aggression, resulting in identity politics that creates, packages and re-sells a sexuality that epitomizes male supremacy. Femininity in turn is linked with emasculation, linked with inferiority, linked with inequality on the basis of sex. Indeed, those who are emasculated in these materials are often specifically described as gay male, while those who abuse them and are iconicized as sexual role models are are described as heterosexual.

These sexualized identity politics in porn hurt the fight for equal rights! They rely on the inequality found between those with power and those without it; between those who are dominant and those who are submissive; between those who are top and those who are bottom; between straight men and gay men; between men and women. From these and other materials, we are told to glorify masculinity and men who meet a hyper-masculine, muscular ideal. The result is such that men who are more feminine are degraded as useless "faggots". These men are in turn presented as enjoying this degradation.

>>6669079
Pretty sure he's being sarcastic, friend.

>>6669104
Oh, ho, ho.
Wew lad.

>>6668384
At least he's not on 4chan

>>6669104
>Many sexualized large, hyper-masculine man, many of whom are described as "straight" men who are sexually aroused by inflicting pain on sexual subordinates (read: gay men) who, in turn are described as enjoying the pain, humiliation, and degradation to which they are subjected. This is the most common theme amongst gay porn.
That's not even true, though. Most gay porn is about two hot guys fucking and one or both of the actors being "gay for pay". Even the ones that create scenarios about straight guys either feature gay men successfully cajoling/seducing straight men into gay sex (e.g. str8-2-gay on men.com) or gay men raping straight men (e.g. str8hell).
Additionally most mainstream gay porn just focuses on classically masculine young guys. There's entire research papers written about how gay porn centres on the white fit young masculine man, and how effeminate types are generally reduced to sidelines (twink porn is a specific subgenre in the same way interrracial porn is a specific subgenre - it's not what most gay men consume).

>>6668986
>The parents would more often than not have sex when the kids were sleeping

kek


just think about that

>>6669196

Not everyone makes a bunch of noises during sex. It isn't like porn or the movies.

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at.

I heard my parents a few times as a child/teen..but it wasn't loud, abusive, it was like a sneeze if anything.

File: trash.jpg (78KB, 832x584px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 832x584px

>>6669104
HOLY SHIT, I had no idea you were some insane radical feminist, no wonder!

This is all 100% garbage, pic related.

>>6668719
>if I say it louder, it means I'm right

>>6668896
>Haven't you ever watched Kids?
I have been responsible for supervising children, but I know that's not what you mean
I've never heard of "Kids" so you'll have to explain the premise if you want to reference it

>>6669104
>This is the most common theme amongst gay porn.
Man have I been watching the wrong gay porn
Also I hope you're being facetious

>>6669465
>I'm not sure what you're trying to get at.
this is exactly what im getting at
>I heard my parents a few times as a child/teen..but it wasn't loud, abusive, it was like a sneeze if anything.


its not a big deal

File: 1382071976491.jpg (29KB, 647x511px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 647x511px

>>6668811
checked AAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>6668408
16 are you fucking serious
are you a woman? 10-12 is the normal age.
that's middle school age for fucks sake

>>6668738
Why are you responding to a study with personal experience? Do you think that you just made a point?

>>6672385
What study? Also yes. What do you really think a study is, if nothing but a bunch of personal experiences?

"Porn is bad because these studies made by pasty white dudes said so": The thread

>>6676026
you say as if any other race provides scientific studies

File: bait.jpg (13KB, 176x260px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 176x260px

>>6668732
>I'm 22 and I block all porn websites because they're disgusting and should be illegal and banned.

>>6668792
>"But kids can't have sexuality, Mr. Freud, because thinking about that reality makes uncomfortable"

Imo some of the kids that get repressed by their parents on sexuality are much more violent. Sexual frustration is scary, yo.

>>6676129
This is true. My sister was heavily pressured into being a good catholic girl and she ended up being raped when she was 13, addicted to hard drugs and pregnant

Yeah, you should, unrestricted internet access can really do a number on kids if you're not careful. I imagine that's how most of the freaks on this board turned out the way they are.

I've looked at porn once in my entire life and I hated every moment of it. It almost got to my brother too, saw him looking at some queer forum, got my parents to put a stop to it real quick.

Now I'm a well adjusted, healthy member of society. Kids'll do unhealthy things if left to their own devices.

>>6676227
>I hated every moment of it.
Faggot.