Archived threads in /lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender - 2310. page

Yes, I ended up transitioning after dealing with years of self-hatred.

>>5226860
see Trans Help General thread

>>5226875
>>5226990

Its purely sexual though, a fetish/kink or whatever. I have no desire to be a woman in daily life, only when "hot".

>>5226383
Personally, I think there's a difference between not being disgusted by men and wanting their dicks in your ass, but that's just me.

I wouldn't really say that's anything out of the ordinary. If you were born in ancient Greece you'd be more or less expected to like qt boys

If you ever start liking chest hair that's when you should worry

>>5226394
That's the problem, mentally there's a significant line between liking/respecting a dude and thinking of a dick in a positive sexual way.

i've never thought about a dude irl "i want his D". But i HAVE fapped to traps getting F'd in the A

Utter bollocks absolute nonsense judge should be flogged

>>5223042

Out of curiosity, why do you disagree with the ruling?

>>5223047
I don't believe the "victim" actually feel for the deception. Something else between them transpired, and she the victim used this to punish the "rapist"

It's a toss up at this point OP.
Either your a fetishist with nothing to worry about, or your about to enter a world of insanity, depression, hormones..

Same. I think it's because the fantasy is hot, but the reality is not.

>>5220256
Fantasy. Or maybe you're just gay or bi. Please don't use drugs and surgery to permanently alter your body.

>>5211324
maybe you should stop liking men thenyou prancing lala fruit?

I hate it too.

Do they just think that they HAVE to act that way because they're gay?

What a bunch of sheep.

>>5211382
>>5211324
Itt: edgy free thinkers

LAST THREAD
>>5228709

xth for Diana

and a shoutout to mai grill Korra

>>5230947
>christmas sucks
:(

Break up with him so he can find someone to be with who is less of a judgmental cunt like you and then afterwards cry about how u are so lonely and blame women for ruining everything when really you are to blame because you're an intolerant douchebag

Why don't you just stop being some kind of "Gay supremacist" and stop giving a fuck about it.

>>5229805
That's a good idea, he's the scumbag for loving him, after he loved someone else.

File: 7ac.jpg (12KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 260x194px

>>5229805
This.

>>5224134
I ask this because I've recently been wondering about whether feminism fundamentally includes or excludes trans people. This has nothing to do with whether the feminist movement ought to include trans people—I think that it could improve the lives of trans people and alleviate their oppression in doing so, which is good—or whether feminists should also support trans rights. This is exclusively about the conceptual and philosophical foundation of feminism. Does feminism include trans people, particularly trans women, as a part of its conceptual and philosophical foundation?

I understand that transfeminism exists, which one could interpret as an interdisciplinary movement that combines trans theory with feminism and supports both, but my question is more concerned about whether transfeminism is fundamentally different from feminism proper. If feminism does include trans people, then transfeminism seems like a synonym for feminism with no real application. If it does not, however, then transfeminism has some meaning as a distinct ideological position—or, at the very least, it's little more than a type of trans-inclusionary feminism.

I also recognize that there are some feminists who exclude trans people, often called trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs). My question has more to do with whether this is a meaningful classification given the fundamental philosophical underpinnings of feminism, and whether "TERFs"—or their opponents—are just self-ascribedfeminists who do misinterpret the core tenet(s) of feminism.

>>5224134
>>5224138
I'm inclined to believe that feminism is philosophically exclusive to cis women, since feminism originated from this group and the core tenet(s) of feminism has, up until recently, been implicitly trans-exclusionary. This doesn't mean that feminism and trans issues are mutually exclusive, only that they are philosophically and ideologically distinct positions which are neither mutually inclusive, biconditional, nor conditionally related. One argument for the contrary—that feminism, the empowerment of women to equality, is fundamentally based on the concept of womanhood and, to a lesser extent, femininity, rather than biological sex or the relationship between sex and gender identity—is compelling, but this is almost certainly not what feminism originally meant, partly because this nuanced issue of gender identity was not known at the time. It seems to me, however, that this would be a revisioning of feminism's core tenet(s) to include trans people, particularly trans women.

Given the complexity of this issue, perhaps a more complex question should be asked—better yet, a series of questions:

>1. What is the fundamental tenet or philosophical idea, or set thereof, that defines feminism? Removing all the inessential ideas, caveats, beliefs, and values that often define feminism (or types of feminism), what is the essential conceptual foundation that is intrinsically feminism?
I would answer this as "the empowerment of women to equality with men". If this answer is acceptable, then on to the second question. If you disagree, then please point out a better answer, for the issue may lie here.

>>5224134
>>5224138
>>5224144
>2. Does "women" mean all who qualify for womanhood, or only those who are biologically female (or only cis females), thereby excluding trans people? Alternatively, assuming "women" means all who qualify for womanhood, what is "womanhood"? Perhaps more importantly, is the status of womanhood conditionally related to the female sex and, in the case of cis females, the relationship between one's sex and gender?
I would answer, tentatively, that womanhood is not necessarily sex-specific or requiring a certain sex–gender relationship, though I would say that it is essentially feminine. If this answer is acceptable, then the issue lies in the third question. If it is not, but the first question is, then this may be where the issue lies.

>3. Given the original interpretation and implied exclusion of trans people that almost certainly existed in feminism's formation, is it appropriate to still call it "feminism" when the core of its ideological identity has been reformed? In other words, is the core interpretation and definition of feminism that informed its origins essential to the definition of feminism, or can that too change while retaining feminism as an ideology?[1]
Even if we assume that the answer's definition in #1 remains constant throughout the entirety of feminism (which is uncertain to unlikely), it's reasonable to assume that the implications of that definition have changed since feminism's formation.

talk it out with her, and just openly communicate... just like other couples do?

Say no still? If you don't want to get fucked in the ass just don't.
It's not even fun it's messy, stinky, rough, and you'll feel like you just got done with massive constipation.

>>5221747
this is new to me, its come out of nowhere and honestly is a big suprise. She has gone to bed now so no chance to talk but if its what she wants Im willing to give it a go. Do I need to prepare? what should I expect?

>>5184069
What are you all listening to? I looked up some songs that have a big difference between the left and right headphone, and am listening to a bunch of those.

Also, I think I might not be a virgin, so that is a thing. I keep reading people saying that it hurts, but it really did not. I think those people are doing something wrong.

>>5185047

you think you might not be a virgin? how does that work? you don't know? or did i read that wrong cuz i'm high?

my s/o is listening to sublime, bad fish, and the birds are singing along with it... they fucking love this song

Will I look like a lesbian forever?

Any other ftms start testosterone after the age of 24?

trans or an hero,and hope that you become a grill in next life, there is no other way

Self bumpidity bump

See a therapist who specializes in gender identity

Can we get a sticky for this? I swear the same thread gets made every day

>>5224065
well its too late now. she knows you're gay. you know you're gay. might as well just end it here.

>>5224668
>OP has a prostate
>Enjoys having it simulated by his gf
>OP must be gay

Just leave.


>>5224065
Good for you OP, next time you should flip fuck and take turns railing each other in the ass.

>>5224738
I hope we can work up to that. I just told her I'm mtf and She is happy for me and cool about it but I don't think she understands what that means for her yet but I think she is finding out. She knows the HRT will sterilize me and shrink my penis but I think it's just now hitting her that I'm not joking or pretending or going to let this go. She has started resenting me I think because now she sees me as her gf and I'm in much better shape than she. We started working out together after she saw I was really starting to get an ass from running and squats.

>>5229902
a-are you a sadist senpai??

>>5229899
>tfw no bf to make me happy
>tfw never smile really big with his cum on my face
>tfw never become needy and pester him when he's away

I think the first thing we really need to discuss is:
Do we let this whole hippy pattern shirt thing continue? You know the ones with the watery colours. The Hollister ones. You know them.

Do we need to move on from this? Straight people are starting to copy.

>>5229899

>wanting a co-dependent bf

you don't wanna go down this road trust me

It's not that's why everyone with a brain hates it

File: 1443741391013.gif (381KB, 500x190px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 500x190px

>trannies
>whining about men pretending to be women

the irony.

To comprehend why is this accepted and black face is not, you have to comprehend the tiers of oppression as defined by tumblr and social justice.

Most privileged to least privileged:
>white cis straight male
>white cis straight woman
>asian cis straight male
>asian cis straight woman
>latino cis straight male
>latina cis straight woman
>black cis straight male
>black cis straight women
>bisluts
>white homosexual cis men
>white whatever trans men
>white homosexual cis women
>asian homosexual cis men
>asian whatever trans men
>asian homosexual cis women
>latino homosexual cis men
>latino whatever trans men
>latino homosexual cis women
>black homosexual cis men
>black whatever trans men
>black homosexual cis women
>arabs
>MtF trannies
>jews
So now we can appreciate from this list that MtF are more oppressed than women, unlike black people that are more oppressed by whites. This is why as a white person, you CAN'T use blackface since it would inherently be racism, but as a MtF, you can crossdress as a woman since women exert oppression over you, and thus it's in no way sexist or should be offensive.

>>5212263
The visible stains of feminine mystique
hnnnnng

>>5212263
Top kek 8/8 m8

File: image.jpg (247KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1280x960px

>>5212263
pass?