Archived threads in /lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender - 1690. page

File: leftfordurk.jpg (2MB, 2624x4016px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2624x4016px

>>6370474
We share the same struggles and will fight the durk durk together. Defeat the radicals, todays zombie apocalypse.

File: 1444439407793.jpg (531KB, 2313x1739px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 2313x1739px

Also remember to ignore the angry people who want you to hate and fear /pol/. They don't know our history and only wish to divide us to turn us against each other.

File: 4114228433101.jpg (735KB, 888x3176px) Image search: [Google]

735KB, 888x3176px

>>6370474
Save Europe!

Save western civilization!

We must stand united against the muslim threat!

>>6369722
i've always liked older guys. been watching young/old gay porn for years

>>6369742
You are literal meme. Please do not post here ever again.

>>6369710
This is why we can't have nice things

Reminder you're safe with /pol/

>>6369665
First for /pol/

File: 1462894978784.jpg (53KB, 375x573px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 375x573px

Please leave /polgbt/ in the old thread

>>6369659
FtM can still use men's toilets because there's no rape paranoia nor men that would go violent on you for being a tranny in there.

>>6369659
If you pass there's no police officer checking ids for people who walk into the restroom.

In other words as long as you aren't making a scene no one will care and very few will know.

File: toilets.png (88KB, 843x615px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 843x615px

http://www.gires.org.uk/assets/Workplace/Transition-in-workplace-policy-Nov-2015.pdf

pic related

File: serveimage-25.jpg (116KB, 469x600px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 469x600px

Fully agreed.

What amazes me are lbgt theists. Truly the top cucks.

File: fedora.jpg (139KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1280x720px

>>6369568
>But most importantly of all: there is no reason to subscribe to these religions. They are not products of divine or supernatural revelation: they are merely myths and beliefs, like all the religions to come before them. This, this is the main reason they should be opposed.

I'm sorry but just because I'm like dicks does not mean I have to be a dick sucking naturalist. Here's your tip.

>>6369568

>there is no reason to subscribe to these religions

This. 21st century religious adherents are the biggest cucks who have no shred of self-respect and cling so tightly to anyone who will give them a sense of belonging.

All it takes is to read some fucking philosophy in order to come to terms with the fact that subscribing to any of these dogmatic, outdated, guilt-ridden systems of belief is to expose your spinelessness and small-mindedness.

File: image.jpg (111KB, 640x905px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 640x905px

>>6369449
Become femboy

>>6369463
I'm so afraid of being judged. It's why I'm almost two years on hormones yet I haven't presented once.

>>6369449
>want to be a girl
>why aren't girls into me?
Because most girls like guys OP. Try it. It feels great.

>littrly named after people who did the Armenian genocide

turks not even once

>>6368982
I don't even watch this guy but but damn nigger learn some history before you talk shit

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Young%20Turk

>watch 20 seconds

there should be an IQ test requirement to use the internet.

Milo's an annoying faggot

>>6368695
I hate /pol/ because the people there aren't real conservatives. They're just in a circlejerk over whose opinion is the edgiest of them all. Nobody at /pol/ actually thinks about their beliefs for longer than a few minutes.

>>6368703
This, too.

>>6368695
He's also a kike. He's a good kike though.

what is essential gaycore?

>>6367249

Niggers we know you are faggots.

Fuck off Montie.

>>6365643
Why do you think theres something wrong in telling someone you'd like to hang out with them every weekend?

>>6365643
That is so cute oh my goodness. You'll be fine :)

>>6365643

Stop being such a fucking homo and have sex with him

>>6360118
>well the clinic thing might work, but how expensive is it? if i were just getting spiro i wouldn't need to go through the trouble
Most of these clinics are sliding scale so the prices are something I'm not sure about and will vary depending on people.

>>6360151
>tfw the OP you wrote is still in use today

File: tumblr_my0y85Zh6m1r60zuio4_r1_250.gif (917KB, 245x156px) Image search: [Google]

917KB, 245x156px

Hey girls!!

>>6358185
I think I remember that guy, didn't he write a story of how he hooked up with a guy that got sexually aroused by being mugged so they met up at a park and he stole the guys wallet or something?

>>6358197
That's hilarious, but I don't think so. ] he's the one with like 4 muscle pups and 'body issues'

Good riddance.

>>6358137
I don't believe people "turn" gay so much as finally discover they are gay or, in some cases, stop living in denial of it.

>>6358137
if you mean that some people can be socialized into "turning" gay, then yes.

Will you fuck me if I admit I'm secretly just a bottom?

File: 1359784339355.jpg (288KB, 680x510px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 680x510px

>>6354181

I don't think there is anything wrong with *being* versatile. I just think its a useless label that invites contention, much like the term 'gay' itself.

I think we would be better off it sexuality was left to simply men who are attracted to males and men who are not. Then there would be less tension about the difference between men who have sex with men, as the CDC calls it, and men who actively and exclusively seek male partners. It would be a lot more realistic.

When you use the same word to describe a sexual interest as you do to name a lifestyle, and then a further fringe identity that most males who either are attracted to males or have sex with them decidedly reject, its deliberately confusing.

To me its fine that a bottom *can be* versatile. But its still a division of 'bottoms' not an exceptional group of people outside of bottoms.

As an adjective, I'm fine with it. As a noun, it makes no sense to me, because versatile bottoms seem to be implying they are not bottoms somehow.

There is also then confusion about what it is they actually prefer. I just think the whole thing is a reaction to the disproportionate amount of bottoms gays have to contend with in their internal dating options.

Likewise, terms like top or masc or straight acting seem like deliberate denials of certain realities, as well as what is actually the difference between a man who has sex with men, heterosexuals, bisexuals, hetero'flexibles' etc.

There just seems to be way to much over reach to include people in a polarized term that sounds like a sexuality but is used to ascribe values that the people may not have just to glom on to legitimacy as males.

This corruption of our language is deliberate and creates paradoxes culturally just to repeat irrational ideas. How is it that people are born gay but while straights can turn gay, gays cannot turn straight? Why is homosexual contact treated by gays as a contact disease that changes ones values and obligations?

I like to be bottom but I like to switch once in a while.

>What other boards do you visit?

/pol/, /r9k/, /s4s/ and /adv/

>What kind of threads do you start, or participate in there?

I usually just contribute. Give a lot of (You)'s. I think it is really important to "see" people if they put in effort in their posts. I like lively threads.

Sometimes I have started some gay related posts on /pol/. Because I think it is unnatural to be anti gay. It is just a prodcut for years of religious kabooki.

In the past I have done some recreational posting on r9k and s4s. It is fun, because trolls on r9k have very good self-depricating humour. I just love the thought of some lonely straight manlet sitting in front of his screen actually considering downloading grindr. Hilarious.

Do you think that you, being /lgbt/, has influenced the type of conversations you're having?

No, not apart from obvious shitposting. I think I have some better perspectives on masculinity than the average straight guy, who is kind of lost and looking for what he is and what to be. So that is why I still can hang out on /adv/.

How do other posters react to you being /lgbt/ on other boards?

/r9k/ and/s4s/ is very open. I don't just feel equal, but also aknowledged. I defintively also feel acknowledged on /pol/, but there is a lot of spam posts like "You should be gassed!" and so on. It doens't really bother me, it is just spam, boring and lame. Some guy out there who didn't even want to paricipate felt he had to write that,

I think the mos suprizing thing is how narrow minded /adv/ is. It is very much a straight dominated space. I recently asked for their opinion on how to seduce a straight guy and they cried "rape" more than feminists at a college campus. I was really dissapointed about /adv/. The concept is great, gay guys need advice from straight guys sometimes, and visa versa. But they are really unfair. They are totally closed for new experiences or taken certain perspectives. I've never seen a devils advocate in a /lgbt/ related /adv/ thread.

>>6352246
/pol/, /y/, /ic/ and /hm/ rarely /co/ /tv/ /v/ and /sci/

tfw the nazis a nigger and the Aryan is faggot