Are Fighter Jets the top predator of the military food chain?
It seems they're capable of destroying everything a military might have.
Even things meant to kill fighter jets (such as SAM sites) are killed by jets conducting SEAD
Can you repeat that question again?
Neutral
I don't know how we could be certain.
>>35192298
YOU'RE NOT THE BOSS OF ME NOW
Am I being detained?
What can a fighter do against the EMP blast created by a nuclear explosion?
>>35192274
>wipes out your whole country
I am the law
>>35192314
be hardened against such threats like most critical electronics
What can a fighter do against a Chief Master Sergeant who's paycheck gets screwed up at finance so the flight line gets shut down?
>>35192342
He can bitch and complain until the lower enlisted get so fucking sick of it that they do their superior's jobs for them (like always)
>>35192274
compared to a missile system or an artillery piece, the plane has more range but there are man-portable weapons to harass them and potentially score a kill
assuming modern manpads can threaten modenr jets, while rocket artillery and such won't have an immediate counter
>>35192366
FOD WALK
>>35192379
MANPADS are only dangerous if you fly at low altitude, which generally isn't necessary.
>>35192415
BUT WE FUCKING CHECKED YESTERDAY
>>35192481
shut up and get on line
>>35192274
They are certainly the most based as far as badassery and looks. boomer submarines are nearly untouchable, but also they just sit there unless its WW3. Fighters are used every day.
Did I mention they look better than anything without tits?
>>35192379
MANPADS are NOT a threat to modern jet aircraft.
They can bully transport helicopters and low flying slow aircraft like a cargo plane.
If your average MANPADS virgin can even SEE a chad fighter jet it isn't like he could get anything resembling a lock before the jet is out of range.
MANPADS are a harassment and denial weapon for rear action against logistical support. They are not a counter to jet aircraft or strategic bombers.
>>35192379
MANPADs are limited by visual and suffer much the same issue as battleships do: missiles outrange them to such an extent that they'll never get to realistically engage the fighter before they're blown to bits.
>>35192631
mmk
time ot make some better manpads then
They certainly are the coolest. Nothing else gets even close.
>>35192274
>Are Fighter Jets the top predator of the military food chain?
Fuck no, even fighter jets can be bombed to shit when they're not in the air.
>>35192324
Winner
>>35192668
>make some better manpads then
Don't you think that they would've if they could've?
>>35192324
Ironically the statement has a double meaning and both meanings are true as per MAD.
>>35192827
You can potentially kill a lion while it sleeps as well, doesn't mean it's not at the top of the food chain.
>>35192485
BUT THE FIRST WAVE ISN'T FOR ANOTHER 12 HOURS.
>>35192274
There is no 'top predator'. Everything works in concert with each other. Failure to adopt combined arms results in defeat.
>>35193163
Sure, but Jets are the toppest of combined arms.
Tanks, infantry, APCs, artillery, ships, other planes, you name it and a jet can fuck it up.
>>35192314
Fly away from it
>>35192324
doesnt have the operational flexibility of aircraft
aircraft can carry similar payloads
put your shit in front and take a picture then post it
Keep doing it with each picture...
Might come out cool!
>>35192324This but also >>35193163
>>35192308
AND YOU'RE NOT SO BIG
>>35193023
(You)
>>35193280
>20+ solid-fuel intercontinental-range SLBMs, each weighing over 100,000 pounds
>aircraft can carry similar payloads
You're a fucking moron.
>>35193280
are you seriously comparing a nuclear powered sub
with an aircraft?
>>35193150
Hippos and elephants.
About to say probably a militarized satellite but even jets can take those out.
So yes jets are king.
>>35196265
>>35192505
b-but in Ace Combat 5 there's this one mission where the bad guys have MANPAD commandos and they shit super seeking missiles from the ground!
>>35197265
Isn't that the same game where you fly your plan through an underground tunnel in order to destroy a nuke facility?
>>35197336
hell yeah
pretty much all of them after 4 have some sort of tunnel flying
>>35193023
>MAD
>>35192505
... says someone who has never used one and understands exactly how little training they require and how easy they are to use.