AR thread/AR General/ARG

File: IMG_1398.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

AR thread, post AR

File: 2017-07-25 20.00.41.jpg (2MB, 1630x918px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1630x918px

Nothing inanimate can have a soul outside of the one you impose upon it, so the soul of a weapon is arbitrary. Where the idea that only slav shit and wood guns can have soul imposed upon them is a mystery to me.

File: PmgssSZ.jpg (2MB, 3648x2736px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3648x2736px

>>35175488
>M1 Garand
No thanks

>>35175488
Looks like pb's, finish could look better

>>35175489
Something something thrill of the hunt something something it's not unique if everyone has one

>>35175525
Any rifle having inherently more soul than another is a spook

File: 20170420_210319.jpg (2MB, 1899x1432px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1899x1432px

>>35175489
A "soul" in concept is only seen by monetary value in the eye of the beholder.

Why people pay money for something that isn't there is beyond me.

>>35175525
>thrill of the hunt
It's literally a pissing contest of who has more money, the hunt is a fabrication.

File: DSC_0261.jpg (3MB, 2400x1595px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x1595px

>>35175488
>>35175504
why is trAsh such an idiot?

File: IMG_0907.jpg (2MB, 2141x2597px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2141x2597px

Did someone say, g-ghosts?

>>35175551
I'm just playing devil's advocate
Rare vs common plays a factor

>>35175553
When shit is rare, banned, etc there is a hunt factor to it tho

>>35175513
it's one of CMPs new stocks, I've been shooting it too often to put on 10+ coats of BLO

>35175555
M1 Garand a shit.

>>35175573
Holy shit kill yourself already you fucking waste

File: 20170311_185247.jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

>>35175560
Speaking of soulless tools.

File: 20170914_202004~2.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

Post (((rares)))

File: ThisTriggersWGWS.png (1002KB, 942x417px) Image search: [Google]

1002KB, 942x417px

>35175574
#Triggered

File: 20170607_145341.jpg (1MB, 2231x1255px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2231x1255px

>>35175489
This is good.

So what we really should be discussing is what sorts of objective facts about a weapon motivate us (rightfully or wrongfully so) to impose the perception of a soul upon it?

I claim that absolute uniqueness in the objective sense is a reasonable sort of characteristic to judge when deciding how much soul one might like to perceive a weapon as having.

Uniqueness can be historical (has it been sitting in cosmo like a million other essentially identical versions of the rifle for decades, or has it been fighting various wars), or compositional (is the particular combination of parts constituting the whole a unique combination?).

ARs have fantastic capability to be compositionally unique, and as such, "soulful". In fact ARs have essentially the best capability for this compositional uniqueness. Just look at the parts market.

To bring this full circle, deciding to put Magpul on your AR is a sure way to undercut the amount of "soul" you might "imbue" your rifle with, considering that by putting Magpul on the rifle you greatly diminish its compositional uniqueness.

>>35175568
>Rare vs. common
Brilliant bulge boy. Brilliant.

File: 1492666176374.jpg (323KB, 1109x1664px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1109x1664px

Akfag here. I want a 20" pencil barrel Colt Vietnam era clone. Anybody start with one of these kits? Spoon-feed me, what else do I need? Where can I find a non-gated M16 style 100% lower? What's a good barrel?

http://whatacountry.com/colt-m16a1-parts-kit.aspx

>>35175580
Soul

>>35175570
Don't wanna buy a surplus set?

>>35175583
Most ARs by definition are not unique since they're made of mass produced parts
They can have soul like FA said or in the sense of an item having history but I wouldn't go confusing unique, soul, and intrinsic value

>>35175584
Buy a parts kit, kill someone for an NDS lower, buy a Green Mountain 1:12 CL pencil barrel.

>>35175619
>I wouldn't go confusing [uniqueness], soul, and intrinsic value
Important

File: 211822C0E94A48DEA17AE7D8C56CDDA53135000007F8F0B2F3B0.jpg (138KB, 1024x773px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1024x773px

>>35175625
I take it I'm not going to be able to shoot 55 grain shit plinking ammo out of that, right? Assuming I can't locate that lower, what's the next best non shit but non correct lower without all kinds of shitty logos and roll marks?

>>35175661
1:12 likes 55 grain

What the fuck are you guys going on about, the soul of an AR? My AR is my bedside gun because I don't give a fuck if I lose it to a police evidence locker. End of.

>>35175673
I do. Im not a huge fan of having things I spent money on rusting in an evidence locker

>>35175673
Yes so it would be considered to have little soul, as it's owner and others have not imposed any upon it

>>35175673
I keep a WASR and a WW1 1911 next to my bed for HD and I also carry the 1911 for my EDC.

>>35175690
Small price to pay for being alive and uninjured.

>ARs
>soul
Its a tool

File: DSC07627.jpg (1MB, 3000x1688px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x1688px

>>35175619
>Not unique because made of mass produced parts.
You don't grasp at all what compositional uniqueness is if you think that the individual unique status of a composing parts is the determiner of the of the overall compositional uniqueness.

>Intrinsic value
You have have no idea what you're talking about. No one is making any axiological claims.

>Confusing uniqueness and soul
No you're simply not listening or are incapable of comprehending. We all agree at FA's behest that rifles and other inanimate objects cannot have soul. The only "soul" that rifles have is the "soul" that we imbue them with based upon their characteristics or qualities (objectively/experientially determined). I made the claim that of the characteristics or qualities we might measure to then make statements about the "soul" of a rifle, uniqueness or rarity might be one of them. This uniqueness or rarity can be historical, compositional, or a wide variety of other possible things. Do you follow?

>>35175692
Bingo.

>>35175706
Every time you post shit like this I'm convinced we're being parkourdude'ed.

>>35175661
55gr is fine through 1:12 in fact that is what was issued for it.

Mckay Enterprises is the next best lower choice down from the Nodak.

Or you can skip all of this hullabaloo, buy a Colt SP1 and be happy that it is "close enough"

>>35175719
If you believe something has soul that literally means it has intrinsic value to you fuccboi
>i bought a bunch of parts that are freely available to literally everyone but in a sea of millions of rifles definitely no one has done anything like mine
Every rifle idea you can think of has been done or damn near close to it
>inb4 it's unique tho cause my detent pins are different

>>35175723
Sorry that I trust my AK and my WW1 1911 to protect my life anon.

File: IMG_1400.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>>35175619
People want too much for them, I'll just finish this one properly, it's has a really nice grain pattern to it

File: thinkig.png (293KB, 708x734px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 708x734px

>>35175673

would you get in trouble if you used an ar15 with an expensive upper for self defense, and before the police got there put a cheapo upper on it? I mean the lower is the firearm, not the upper

File: prosessori sammako.png (168KB, 727x682px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 727x682px

>>35175745
>If you believe something has soul that literally means it has intrinsic value to you fuccboi
Uh oh incoming dissertation

File: 20170420_185328.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>35175755
>m1911

I hope it's a mixmaster, for your safety.

File: 20170725_152914.jpg (2MB, 2221x1352px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2221x1352px

>>35175745
>If you believe something has soul that literally means it has intrinsic value to you fuccboi
Not it doesn't you shitlord, you don't know my axiology, and further you missed the part where I agreed with FA that rifles can't actually have metaphysical soul, but can only have subjective "soul" as imbued by us, so even in the event that my axiology had statements such as "things with soul are good/valuable", you still would be wrong because I don't believe inanimate objects can have that sort of soul (thanks FA).

>Every rifle idea you can think of has been done or damn near close to it
>damn near close to it
Nice inverted No True Scotsman.
Following that line of reasoning you can keep changing your threshold of compositional uniqueness so that no AR can be compositionally unique, then argue that no AR can have "soul" based on compositional uniqueness.

If you machine your own detent pins you sure as hell have an objectively unique rifle, and so would be objectively correct to claim that your rifle is compositionally unique AND absolutely unique (since it isn't the combination of your detent pins that makes the rifle unique, but the usage of the pins themselves, by themselves since they themselves are unique).

If you're operating under my proposed framework of "soul imbuing" then you could claim that the detent pins give you reason to imbue your rifle with soul.

>>35175785
Nice pepe.

>>35175785
I can feel his jew hands typing as we speak, a wall of text high enough to block out the sun for a fortnight at least

>>35175765
I have no experience in the arena, but it would seem to me that there isn't really a reason for a full forensic workup in a defensive shoot. Then again, I could be dead wrong.

Surefire m300 or m600? I've got an arisaka inline and cloud defensive lcs in the mail, can't decide on the light.

>>35175745
A soulless, but useful, tool has intrinsic value. Something with 'soul' but not useful, is a collectors item for those who ascribe animistic values to items.

>>35175809
How long is the barrel?

>>35175801
>Passive aggressive ad hom regarding my ability to type fucking sentences arrives on the scene.
Okay this is boring now.

>>35175765
Tampering with evidence I imagine.

>>35175809
Rule of thumb that I don't believe in is that 14.5" can be either, 16"+ should be M600, and 14" and below should be M300.

>>35175801
Ur done kid
>>35175809
What's the rifle it's going on like?

>>35175797
>30 minutes to write "you're wrong because my beleefs"
Mein sides

>>35175810
Squares are quadrilaterals but not all quadrilaterals are squares
Soul literally requires you to pur value on something over what its materialistic value is, ie intrinsic value

>>35175794
How do I tell if its a mixmaster?

>>35175810
Hell yeah.

>>35175807
They'll be able to tell that the cheap upper hasn't just had a round fired through it at least.

>>35175810
Use is its own kind of value, not inherent

File: 06252017.jpg (618KB, 1224x918px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 1224x918px

Just got my bobro in. waiting for my tr24r on monday.

>>35175830
Some use value is instrinsic to the human condition, ie intrinsic

>>35175826
No you're wrong because you can't possibly construct a correct argument about a subject that you barely understand.

>>35175830
>>35175810
>>35175828
>Tools
>Intrinsic value
Wait oops. I don't support that in the slightest.
I did support:
>Something with 'soul' but not useful, is a collectors item for those who ascribe animistic values to items.

>>35175809
M600. Single cell cr123 lights aren't acceptable on pistols, why would they be acceptable on rifles?

File: FB_IMG_1503496430146.jpg (161KB, 960x511px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 960x511px

>>35175759
I should have never sold my grand. I miss it so much. At least I kept the 1884.

>>35175809
>>35175822
This

File: Dat bobro quality.jpg (72KB, 450x800px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 450x800px

>>35175831
>bobro

File: jew_basic.jpg (19KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 220x220px

>>35175456
how would I go about getting a merchant engraved on my lower receiver ?

>>35175861
By going to an engraver

>>35175831
one of the nicest ARs in this thread
how much did it cost you all together excluding glass?

File: IMG_20170814_134626980.jpg (2MB, 3523x2043px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3523x2043px

>>35175831
That's gonna look awesome. Congrats.

File: 764478898.jpg (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

I definitely feel ARs lack a certain character that alot of slav/wood/old/etc guns do. Maybe it's because ars are everywhere. Maybe it's because they have become tacticool abortions. There is something special about that old beat up ak that my ar doesn't have.

>>35175847
Your post literally said I was wrong because of your belief in what soul is, while completely ignoring the literal definition of intrinsic value
If you put any value on something passed its materialistic value that's intrinsic, that's not arguable
You're also completely ignoring the dictionary definition of unique too
>one of a kind, unlike anything else
Not many rifles are truly unique

>>35175818
16" barrel 13" handguard.

>>35175822
>16"+ should be M600

The m600 seems to be a more frequent choice and I sort of get why. I was leaning toward the m300 so I can mount it forward but behind the muzzle device and not have to adjust my support hand position to use the pressure switch in the lcs.

>>35175823
>What's the rifle it's going on like?

See first response. 13" mk8 over a 16" Hanson profile. I've posted it here before but it's not complete so I don't keep the picture on my phone.

>>35175719
So I impose soul on my Magpul M&P sport with moldy labia ejection port cover? Nah bro, unless it was used to remove kebab or something.

File: anigif_enhanced11689139397173911.gif (981KB, 245x315px) Image search: [Google]

981KB, 245x315px

>>35175739
I was considering just getting an SP1. Has anyone here shot one? How is it?

>>35175895
Yep m600

>>35175906
So the feats accomplished by the rifles wielder using said rifle give it soul? Elaborate.

File: 1499131809889.jpg (2MB, 4032x2223px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x2223px

>>35175879
I think if you get a good setup that fits your needs and you use it enough, it can get some character. I've killed a lot with my rifle and put some wear on it in the process. Just depends how you look at it.

File: IMG_20170913_125351572.jpg (3MB, 4160x2262px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2262px

>>35175895
This is what my m600 looks like with a 16" ba Hanson and 12" handguard and arisaka inline mount. Probably not going to use a switch for some time because I don't have to move much to use the clicky cap.

>>35175914
God's last, perfect creation

>>35175916
Got it.

>>35175935
The lcs can be set up in either direction so I can probably make it work. Only way for me to be sure is to try.

>>35175928
It's a tool, and a tool is judged on how well it does said job, and by how robust it is in doing great work. A rifle, any rifle, which is in conflict and demonstrates it's ability to do a task well and not shit itself has pedigree, or soul, or wherever you'd like to call it that separates it from its bench/safe queen counterparts

>>35175979
So then why do functionally worse tools (AKs, other slavshit, milsurp) tend to be considered to have more soul? Because they have been more effectively put into use as tools? I could see that.

File: 20170725_153106.jpg (2MB, 2258x1270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2258x1270px

>>35175880
>Belief in what soul is
You made a claim about what I believe, and refuted the claim by clarifying what I believe? Got a problem with that? Don't make strawman arguments.

Intrinsic value simply means non instrumental. You're completely wrong about materialism being the defining factor in determining if something's value is intrinsic or instrumental. Purely metaphysical non material concepts such as democracy can clearly have instrumental value, even though they are entirely immaterial.

>Dictionary definition
No one is using definitions from dictionaries since dictionary definitions are constructed from common use, and as such are entirely subject to the collective false notions of morons like yourself.

Further you're still refusing to even attempt to begin unpacking what I mean by compositionally unique. Consider a set of 5 numbers, with each number constrained to the set of numbers {1,2,3,4,5}. We can talk about the compositional uniqueness of a particular set by considering the number of combinations unique that the set can take on (5^5=3125), and then by considering the discrete population distribution histogram of the general set. If your particular set (1,3,2,1,5) is uncommon, then it doesn't matter that every other set has a 1, 3, 2, 1, or 5. Your set is compositionally unique.
DO YOU FUCKING GET IT?

>>35175928
They could if you subscribe to a notion that the objective historical uniqueness of the rifle corresponds to "soul" of the rifle, or rationalizes your imbuing of the rifle with "soul", not to be confused with actual soul, or axiological value or good, fucking orangecat.

>>35175979
But is it separated because it has been objectively been determined to be a good tool, or is it separated because now it is historically unique from the thousands of its brethren that simply sit it cases for years.

>>35176004
I think it is historical uniqueness.

>>35175489
what rail?

File: 1503816557717.webm (2MB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x480px

>>35176004
>functionally worst

They don't kill people by the thousands?

>>35176020
>another argument because wgws is literally incapable of reading
O boi my favorite episode
>if you believe something has soul, then it has intrinsic value
This wasn't directed at you fuckboi, it's a general statement
>"THE DICTIONARY IS WRONG"
Ok nevermind go fuck yourself retard

>>35176040
Larue lt15

>>35176062
thank you m8

>>35176047
>if you believe something has soul, then it has intrinsic value
>This wasn't directed at you fuckboi, it's a general statement
And it is a wrong general statement because it depends on what axiology one subscribes to.

>"THE DICTIONARY IS WRONG"
>"dictionary definitions are constructed from common use, and as such are entirely subject to the collective false notions of morons like yourself."
Quit strawmaning me you retard.

I h8 u gook manlet.

>>35176084
>the dictionary says you're wrong
>"WELL IT'S ALL FROM COMMON USE SO IT CAN FALL TO FALSE NOTIONS FROM RETARDS LIKE U"
>so you're saying it's wrong
>"STOP STRAWMANNING ME"
You can't just reassign the definition of a fucking word to fit your need when you're wrong about something, how about that?

File: IMG_2783.jpg (1MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2448x3264px

>>35175872
spreadsheet says around $2k. I've been putting it together over the past couple years, so the prices I've paid for some components were higher than current prices.

>>35175873
Thanks man

>>35176112
I'm not saying the dictionary is wrong though, just that can't/shouldn't support your definition of uniqueness with the dictionary definition of uniqueness. You claiming that I'm simply saying that the dictionary is wrong, and claiming that there is something clearly wrong with that claim, is both a straw man and an appeal to authority.

Further this isn't about absolute uniqueness, as I've clearly tried to communicate to you that I consider it reasonable to imbue a rifle with "soul" not based on its absolute uniqueness but rather its compositional uniqueness.

>>35176084
Considering different axiology, doesn't that mean you're both right and now arguing over semantics? I don't really see either argument as invalid. Especially considering how vague the idea of a soul is.

File: (ASS)AdvancedSniperSystem (2).jpg (1MB, 3456x1946px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3456x1946px

>>35175935
That the 3 or 5x? Mount?

>>35175555
caus he can't get dem quads

>>35176136
2k with glass is not bad at all. What trigger? I bet that thing will be a blast to shoot.

>>35176145
It means we should probably establish our axiology first. But that is far below oc's paygrade since he literally is a gook version of Paul Blart.

The idea of the soul is very vague, which is why I'm harping on FA's definition from like last thread that basically says that real souls can't ever belong to inanimate objects, since that seems like a reasonable working definition, not to be confused with the dictionary definition of soul.

Neither argument is invalid, but oc's are unsound since many of his propositions are either untrue, or unknown to be true or false.

File: IMG_2457.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>35176161
Geissele SD-E. I have a shit camera.

>>35176182
>>35176145
Above his paygrade. Above.
jk oc I wish I could work security. Kinda.

>>35176143
Or you can understand that the word unique has a set definition and that it hasn't changed in hundreds of years

And arguing compositional uniqueness is fucking useless, by that argument to A2 pistol grips are unique from each other

>>35176145
It's only gone to semantics because WGWS keeps wanting to change the argument cause he's a philosophy major and thinks using ridiculous synonyms makes anyone look at him differently

File: IMG_20170814_134604772.jpg (1MB, 3900x1192px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3900x1192px

>>35176154
5x GDI RCOM-E. Don't consider it unless you want to buy mine. It's good for a $200 optic, but it's no ACORN.

>>35176191
Are straight triggers a meme or good?

File: Sig P320 Fullauto conversion.jpg (17KB, 513x392px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 513x392px

>>35176201
What don't you like about it? Everyone i've asked about the PA prisms seems to love them
Also is that mount any good for $40, seems kind of low for something meant for ACAUG

>>35176195
>And arguing compositional uniqueness is fucking useless, by that argument to A2 pistol grips are unique from each other.
This is a good argument, but I think that it moves the goalposts of absolute uniqueness quite a bit, so far so as to make it so that everything that isn't identical is thereby unique. I don't claim that at all. I claim that we can describe a coherent framework defining the compositional uniqueness of a firearm, appealing to a basic principle that the atomic unit of a firearm is an individual part, as opposed to an individual polymer molecule.

>Philosophy Major
Try again.

>>35176212
Good IMO. Less contact area theoretically means faster actuation.

>>35176212
They're aesthetic. I have both curved and straight, and I think the " lighter perceived pull" of the flat bow triggers is a meme.

Regardless, it's still a Geissele. The only trigger I'd consider better than a Geissele is a Jewell.

>>35176231
And everyone else is talking about functional and/or aesthetic uniqueness, so which conversation do you want to be a part of?
Compositional uniqueness is great right up until the gun is still basically the same thing as the guy's next to you

>>35176224
Ever since I got behind an ACOG, it just feels Sub-par in every way. Too bulky, too heavy. It actually sits pretty high in that mount, like, almost a quarter inch too high, for correct alignment if shooting ntch, which would require moving it at least one space farther forward in order to get proper eye relief. It's really not that bad for what it is, and the GDI mount is a steal at 40 bucks, but I still wish I would have socked the money away and saved for a nicer optic. It's really not bad, just not as good as I want it to be.

File: 4oxma.jpg (113KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1280x960px

>>35176020
Let me put it this way. What is a hammer? We can describe it by it's materials, hardened steel, wood, fiberglass etc. But is that what it is? No, a hammer is a hammer when it's in the act of hammering shit. A shitty $5 hammer has more qualities of a "hammer" if it lasts long enough to be used in the way it's meant to be used. But what is an expensive ass hammer that is hung up in a shed somewhere and had never been used? It's a hammer, yes, but to it's "user " it's not much of one is it? It's less so of a hammer than the beat ass one that has driven thousands of nails successfully.

File: 1420799733067.jpg (9KB, 194x260px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 194x260px

>>35176279
Thanks for the help, have a lisserd

>>35176269
I think functional, aesthetic (subjective unless you appeal to composition), historical, and compositional uniquness are all reasonable criteria to base our imbueing of "soul" upon.
>is great right up until the gun is still basically the same thing as the guy's next to you
Please read my post again:
onsider a set of 5 numbers, with each number constrained to the set of numbers {1,2,3,4,5}. We can talk about the compositional uniqueness of a particular set by considering the number of combinations unique that the set can take on (5^5=3125), and then by considering the discrete population distribution histogram of the general set. If your particular set (1,3,2,1,5) is uncommon, then it doesn't matter that every other set has a 1, 3, 2, 1, or 5. Your set is compositionally unique.

If you have rifle (1,3,2,1,5) and the guy next to you has (1,3,2,1,1), your rifle is still compositionally unique from his, but to a lesser degree than if he had rifle (1,3,1,1,1). What matters however isn't the comparison to just one other possible rifle, but rather the comparison to the population histogram of the existing actualized combinations. The question isn't if your combination is truly one of a kind or not, but rather the degree to which your combination approaches the tails of the distribution.

Now consider that ARs can have some 200 parts or so, with several of them having a great deal of variety of choice when selecting the part (rails, barrels, upper, lower, trigger, grip, stock, sights). There are a lot of combinations, so a great deal of POSSIBLE compositional uniqueness.

>>35176296
Plato on forms would disagree, but okay.

>>35176331
And I never said it wasn't, I said that it wouldn't be unique
Notice how those are two different definitions?

>>35176331
Heidegger would disagree with Plato.

File: OD_Green_or_GTFO.jpg (1MB, 918x1632px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 918x1632px

what's the cheapest non-shit bayonet I can get?

>>35176428

Probably something like this
https://ads.midwayusa.com/product/252558/military-surplus-m7-bayonet?cm_mmc=pf_ci_connexity-_-Military%20Surplus%20-%20Knives%20%26%20Tools-_-Military%20Surplus-_-252558

You know you have to remove your MD in order to attach/detach one, right?

Mek would be a better person to ask.

>>35176428
Also, here's a good thread to read.

https://www.ar15.com/forums/ar-15/Ar_15_Bayonet_Recommendations_Please/118-588401/

i'm about to buy my very first ar, should i go with 16" mid or 14,5" middy?

>>35176538
14.5

>>35176490
>You know you have to remove your MD in order to attach/detach one, right?
for realz? dang

>>35176558
i'm leaning toward that too, but comp is pinned and welded and i wouln't really like to damage the barrel by removing it

>>35176610
oof, that is an issue

>>35176570
What MD do you have?

>>35176649
j-comp v1

>>35176621
is there any advantage of 14,5" over 16" except this one and a half inch?

>>35176654
The ring is meant to fit into the groove of an a2 fh. I actually don't know if the ring will fit in the groove on the jcomp.

Can someone tell me why the old style stuff like the 20" pencil barrels and a1 stuff isn't in here with all the cool kids? You guys prefer the little short barrels why?

File: IMG_20170722_095114.jpg (236KB, 935x587px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 935x587px

>>35176741
CQB operatin'

>>35176765
So basically you guys are larping on some BS, but the 20" is still superior?

>>35176712
hmmm well it doesn't appear to be wider than the barrel...

File: IMG_20170815_142844332.jpg (235KB, 1152x864px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1152x864px

>>35176741
Because manlets

File: pierre.jpg (25KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x500px

I need the webm of that "girl" with the mpx in her backpack.

asking for a friend

File: 1476727250255.jpg (492KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 2048x2048px

>>35176797
>short barrels= manlets
stfu trASHley

File: trapsarentgay.jpg (317KB, 961x1280px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 961x1280px

>>35176804
you mean the tranny?

File: wutissaturation.jpg (3MB, 3456x1946px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3456x1946px

>>35176765
I'm an 18" boy, more than most on here so obviously i'm superior to them
But yeah, some larp here and there but 14.5-16 is nice for smaller form factor

>>35176787
I misidentified your MD. It might work. A2 outer diameter is .875. you might need to do some fitting, but if your lug is the correct length from the shoulder of the MD, it might fit.

>>35176832
meant for >>35176782
my b

File: hy.jpg (11KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 225x225px

>>35176822
Someones a mad manlet.

>>35176832
>18
>not spr
$800 one time deal just no diemaco or gb :^

File: DSC_0108.jpg (658KB, 1900x1586px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 1900x1586px

>>35176869
6'3" try again fuckboi

File: mk12AintGotShitOnMe.jpg (2MB, 1504x2974px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1504x2974px

>>35176886
>18
>not spr
'scuse me? :^
Not like I need it anymore now that I have 7 M110s

File: DEVoSLEVwAArZj8.jpg (98KB, 675x1200px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 675x1200px

>>35176888
oh its you and that ugly ass rifle again.
ummm...... No Thanks

>>35176823
yeah that one

>>35176888
>adding an inch since last time
'>'

>>35176895
You know you wanna rebuild into mk12, gimme aug money already

>>35176897
>u-ur rifle is ugly
pathetic
>>35176902
I usually round down :^

File: orangecat.png (113KB, 719x511px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 719x511px

>>35176902
Never heard of a growth spurt? ofc not, gooklet

and "Mk11"
ftfy

>>35176916
Wrong kind of gook. OC's vietnamese.

>>35176921
tomato tomato (say those differently)

File: IMG_3648.jpg (76KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1024x576px

>>35176912
I'm bringing a tape measure and a ladder to the next shoot now fuccboi

>>35176916
>$4500 out of your price range
Ftfy ;^

>>35175456
what upper is that and where can i buy it

>>35176899
let me check my meme folder to see if I have it.

>>35176926
Difference is pertinent in that vietnam hasn't been nuked (Although it probably should have been)

File: sad.gif (500KB, 139x203px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 139x203px

>>35176927

>>35176927
>tape measure and a ladder
fug

>>35176929
casv-mt vltor

>>35176939
>only country to beat america in a war
We are stronger than you could possibly imagine

>>35176940
Mk12 still on table if this dude doesn't trade me his urxii

>>35176942
Next time we're up there too we should see if we have time to check out OKCorral for their 3gun

>>35176899
Well it looks like I dont have it. Sorry my dude :(

File: IMG_1437.jpg (2MB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x3024px

>>35175850
why would you sell a garand

File: heli shop.png (335KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 800x600px

>>35176979
thanks anyway for the effort brah

have a rare helicopter for your trouble

>>35176959
I'll just stick with my Mk12A4 for now, and if I gave you AUG money then you wouldn't have an AR and wouldn't be allowed to post here anymore and I'd rather you build your (2nd worst)URX build

File: 4anon.gif (2MB, 332x332px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 332x332px

>>35177015
found it on the interwebs

>>35177024
I'd get it eventually, I plan to grab a lower soon before they're OOS again

what keymod rails are /k/ aproved?

>>35177080
None keymod a shit

>>35177080
This isn't /k/, this is /arg. And there are no /arg/ approved keymod rails because keymod is not /arg/ approved.

>>35176658
no not really
clone autism

>>35177035
is that a trap?

what AR rifle are used in service other than MK18, M4A1, MK12 and M110?

>>35177109
Yes. tacticool taryn

>>35177093
>>35177097
shelfmod then?

>>35177125
No. Mlok or picatinny. Keymod is demonstrably shit, as seen in the test performed by crane.

>>35177125
Geissele for MLOK
DD for 1913

>>35177143
that's one of the ugliest rifles I have ever seen

where can i find cheapest b5s?

>>35177176
https://www.armsunlimited.com/BCM-B5-SOPMOD-BRAVO-AR15-M4-Mil-Spec-Stock-p/b5-bravo.htm
$40 shekels

>>35177204
thanks but my autism requires battery tubes.

>>35177223
Cheapest non-bravo seems to be http://grabagun.com/b5-sopmod-stk-mil-spec-fg.html but I don't know for sure

Since this is the ultimate AR autist thread.
Anyone here have ecperience with german ARs?
Schmeisser, Hera, Oberland?
Also how is Windham?

>app version of gunstruction literally doesn't have shit compared to desktop version
Why?

>>35177248
Probably can't load the complex rails, desktop version has enough trouble with them

>>35177248
>being a mobilefag

Desktop version sucks shit too
>No KAC
>Like 2 ACOG models
>no carry handle mounts
>optic mount is buggy as fuck
Not to mention it has to load a reddit tier rifle every fucking screen

>>35177263
It doesn't even have all the pistol grips and magazines tho? I wanted to mock up my pistol out of boredom but they don't even have usgi mags or the ergo grip

>>35177270
it seems like whoever sponsors arfcom gets on there.

>>35177270
No KAC? Shit, I dropped when I didn't dee LMT.

>>35176981
I needed the money a while back. Sold most everything I had that was of any value that wasn't immediately necessary to live. Only kept my sidearm and heirloom firearms. Had to pretty much restart my life 2 years ago.

File: Ribbed.jpg (3MB, 4320x2432px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4320x2432px

>>35177296
Nope, none at all
I'm surprised that KAC doesn't sponsor to get their shit in there since if people saw how gucci rib panels look people would spend $60/rib

>>35177327
They already have fuckers like us to shill for them.

File: ikr.gif (873KB, 245x245px) Image search: [Google]

873KB, 245x245px

>>35177345

File: IMG_3615.jpg (106KB, 640x785px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 640x785px

>>35177345
KAC and LMT are only for people in the know

would it be retarded to put skateboard tape on the bottom of mags?

>>35175827
He means, because most WWI 1911's have been shot to the point of almost being unsafe; however, some of the ones kept in service have had so many parts replaced that they are much more durable now as mix-and-match, Frankenstein 1911's. For example, the slides were not originally hardened.

Just look at the gun posted in >>35175794. I am not sure of the vintage of the slide because I don't see the rampant colt stamp and I haven't studied the font and text block styles that well, but the frame is definitely a refinished pre-A1 style frame, since it lacks the finger cutouts behind the trigger. At least the grips, trigger, barrel bushing, grip safety, mainspring housing and thumb safety are non-original or modified for the vintage of this frame. Possibly the slide too, given its age and the amount of maintenance done to the gun.

>>35177412
Yes

File: 1505432896970.jpg (64KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1024x576px

>>35177248
>not already having a gorillion parts for mockup

Gunstruction is ass

>>35177425
but I want better grip on my mags

>>35177437
Stop being a limp wristed faggot, its probably you fucking up your grip.

File: 2013-02-21_22-21-13_18.jpg (1MB, 3264x1840px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1840px

>>35177422
I was mostly referencing the non-existent heat treating that the m1911 was plagued by and had fixed in the a1 version.

Mine was a mixmaster of a1 parts with correct matching slide and frame. Since the ignition components were destroyed and some fuckstick nickel plated it after filing off the us property stamp, I threw some new parts at it and parked it.

A complete waste of parts and money, but I had fun doing .

>>35177382
>only for people in the know
this is true

>>35177377
I need shill money from LMT in the form os sopmods and mars lowers.

>>35177435
Maybe when I'm your age Mekzor

File: 20170224_181255.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>35177506
Nah don't do that, it's stupid tbhfam.

File: IMG_0180.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

Anyone want a TA31 RCO? $575 shipped

>>35177525
is it stolen valor?

>>35177525
How giddyfucked/stolen is it?

>>35177523
I'm hoping that with a PDW I will be able to /actually/ not be tempted into more shit I don't really want. I want to round out my Cuban/Ukrainian collection right now really

>>35177536
I don't know what that means...

I filed sbr paperwork for the last gun I have that matches up with the reticle, so I'm going to an eotech.

>>35177559
did you steal it from the military or did the person you bought it from steal it from the military?

>>35177525
plus it's got some wear on the body/caps

Where can I get a good 10.3/10.5" barreled upper with plastic handguards and fixed carry handle? I know colt made them at some point in time

>>35177571
I bought it from a non-military coworker, so I doubt it.

>>35177582
Alright Im gonna pass no reason to risk it.

>>35177525
If I send this into Trijicon to replace the tritium lamps, will they report me to the Military Police?

>>35177602
>>35177582

Don't worry ash can't afford it anyways

File: IMG_7244.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

I got my rail! It weighs less than I thought

File: Family Photo.jpg (1MB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1440px

Same shit as always. I think I'm pretty much done with these aside from small bits like ambi selectors and maybe a trigger for the shorty.

I can't even tell who is worse any more, the autistic faggots in /akg/ or the autistic faggots in /arg/. The degenerate retards in /brg/ are still the worst as a whole, but it's a close race.

>>35177621
>same shit
no complaints, these are some of my favorite rifles on the board.

>>35177525
Email?

>>35177648
[email protected]

>>35177644
Well thankya, sir.

guys

GUYS

This thread confuses me.

>>35177612
I could but Im not gonna risk getting a stolen valor and not being able to send that shit in for repairs.

>>35177621
>Vortex razor
How do you like it?

File: 654698468546546854685465146541.jpg (634KB, 1613x1210px) Image search: [Google]

634KB, 1613x1210px

>>35177621
>>35177644
Without a doubt a contender for the best "pistol" AR on /k/. If I wasn't trying to keep somewhat of a CAR look on the one I'm slapping together I'd get that "brace" in a heartbeat.

>>35177576
Little rust on the thumbscrew too

>>35177579
Buy my 11.5

>>35177807
Yeah, that's why I'm selling it cheap. Glass is great though

Decent rear iron sight in the 0-$75 range? Don't care if it flips up or not.

File: 1_SBM4_Left-ghosted-60-2017.jpg (200KB, 1648x600px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1648x600px

>>35177782
It is, for the price, fucking incredible. The eyebox is massive, 1x mode with the dot in super quick (thanks to the huge eyebox), and the glass is very clear. The JM reticle is quite good as well.

>>35177792
Thanks! I'm thinking about either making a clone of that pistol but in 9mm, or making a retro CAR style 5.56 for my next project. Won't happen until next year probably. For yours, I would just use one of pic related. I think it will get you close to a true CAR look, but still a brace so you can avoid the NFA shit. SB Tactical SBM4, I think I've seen them in the $100 range.

>>35177825
I agree, seems like It's a good price. It's probably not stolen just abused.

>>35177834
Thinking of putting one on my .308 because I've heard great things. I only shoot 100 yards max (shitty, i know), so I figured its the best glass for what I want.

>>35177827
Stolen valor KAC Micro 600m rear BUIS on ebay for $50-$75, haven't looked in a while though.

File: 465416516851465163516351.jpg (1MB, 2016x1512px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2016x1512px

>>35177834
I've been tempted on that. I went ahead and ordered a kak brace kit with the tube assembly because while not as comfy as the SBs, it has more of that CAR stock look to me. Will see if I get tired of it or not.

>>35177861
Well, if you can pony up for it, wait for Sportsman's Guide to have their double discount. Comes up frequently and with that you get the best price I've found for it. I forget what I paid but it was $90 less after the double discount and free shipping through them.

>>35177869
I have a KAK Blade, it was on the pistol previously. I hated it but I have prominent collar bones and fuck if that strap loop on top didn't like to dig into my collar bone...

Speaking of, I have a PSA pistol tube, buffer, buffer spring, and black KAK Blade I'd sell as a kit to someone for uh...money.

>>35177873
I'll keep my eyes peeled

>>35177863
thx senpai

File: IMG_0865.jpg (1MB, 3021x2442px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3021x2442px

>>35175873
All of your rifles are good. Mine need less ugly.

File: lr-15.jpg (43KB, 1200x600px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1200x600px

Why does bear creek have to be so shit. Their logo is so cool. :(

>>35177892
>money
I'll give you a virtual handjob.

>>35177925
I like the bear, but why do companies keep going for the caliber multi meme.

>>35177911
No problem, and here is a link to the best price for new sights that I see currently:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-SEALED-Knights-Armament-KAC-Rear-Sight-flip-up-Micro-FOLDING-200-600M-USMC-/253137011511?epid=1331422787&hash=item3af0244337:g:yAkAAOSwCY9Zrzvs

If you wait around you'll probably come across someone selling decent sized lots at $60-$65 per.

>>35177938
idk my anderson has that stupid multi cal shit on the side.

>>35177939
huh they changed the bags. Mine came in a bigger bag that had some stupid card that told you how to zero the sight.

>>35177949
Is that lower actually shit? What's wrong with it?

>>35177988
Just different packaging AFAIK. Marine buddy said their arms room had a few of the older style packages with the card, and nowdays they come in little individual sealed baggies. Can't say for certain, but I bought one of these kind for a buddy and it is identical to my two that came with the card.

>>35177997
Nothing wrong with mine, my pistol is built on an Anderson. I maw swap it out for something else later but only for ambi mag controls and shit.

>>35178026
Should've clarified. I was talking about the bear creek one. I can't see how a company can produce a bad lower, considering someone else makes it and they just have their roll marks on it? I could be completely off but that's my understanding.

>>35175456
Suggestions for a good upper receiver to use with a KAC lower

>inb4 KAC upper

File: l-o-n-g1.jpg (2MB, 5184x2599px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5184x2599px

>>35177619
Fits nice, plz rate. Should I get a kak flash can? I don't like how close my flashlight is to my muzzle

>>35177997
idk I know their barrels, uppers, and complete rifles are shit. I just dont think I could trust one of their lowers.

>>35178060
Get a surefire muzzle device and put a warden on B)

>>35178060
nice
no, your light isn't in any danger

File: IMG_0082.jpg (195KB, 928x454px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 928x454px

>>35177892
Wish I would have known that before ordering, but I only need one.

File: 20170725_152906.jpg (2MB, 2480x1219px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2480x1219px

>>35177619
Too bad it is Troy.

>>35177621
Nice guns dude.

>>35178060
Rifle looks solid except for rear pigfat MBUS. Skip flash can. It is a poorfag piece of aluminum that does nothing. I'll sell you a brand new SiCo ASR mount and muzzle device that SiCo will probably take and give you the muzzle device of your choice and their blast diffuser in exchange.

>>35177619

>Night of the living octotubes

Ugh I fucking hate these, so ugly, when will it end? Just give me 1913 on top and M-Lok at 3, 6, and 9 o'clock.

File: 1492895732240.png (258KB, 500x449px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 500x449px

>>35178146
>I'll sell you a brand new...
Begone

File: o-NIGEL-FARAGE-PINT-facebook.jpg (191KB, 1536x1024px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1536x1024px

>Order 500 LC .308 cases from midway
>Receive ~800 cases
Based Larry Potterfield

>>35178049
Literally anything. Rainier's gen...uh...4...uppers have a darker color to them if KAC lowers are darker.

>>35178146
I didn't realize VTac was Troy till I had already ordered it, oh well

>>35178089
I like the warden, I might do that

>>35178170
I like the way octotube feels man

>>35178049
LMT mrp

>>35178146
Thanks, nice riffle you got there yourself.

>>35178202
>tfw no fresh English pint

>>35178206
I always forget about Rainier

>>35178225
You can buy LMT upper receivers?

>>35178335
Fit and finish on mine is every bit as good as my Noveske, but has the darker anodization I wanted to match my oddball Royal Arms lower.

Are the Aero monthly giveaways a meme or do they actually just give away a rifle?

>>35178335
>You can buy LMT upper receivers?
Yes you can. here is a quick grab, but you can buy other options.

https://www.tombstonetactical.com/catalog/lmt/mrp-rifle-length-upper-5.56mm-16in-black/

>>35178344
They're legit, friend of an Army buddy won one last year. It was some goofy battleworn bronze kit but he loved it.

File: 20170618_140209.jpg (2MB, 4032x2268px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x2268px

>boss keeps saying how amazed he is at how fast i work
>he may be able to finish the project ahead of schedule
so...do i ask for a raise?

>>35178453

You only get raises as often as you should if you ask.

File: 2017-09-09 14.56.07.jpg (4MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3024x4032px

>>35178453
lol fuck no

knowing your job history, you've only been there like three weeks. Not a good time to ask for raise. Maybe in the 8 month to 1 year range

>>35178453
How long have you been employed with him?

>>35178453
>asking for a raise after 3 weeks
What do you have to lose?

>>35178463
>>35178470

I ask for raises every 6 months.

I usually get them.

Ever 1.5 years I tell my employer that I've started looking for other opportunities, and usually get a raise or some other kind of accommodation out of that too. Better / more flexible scheduling, additional benefits, shifting work I don't like on to someone else, etc.

Within 2 years I'm a close to the top of the pay scale at any company I work at and have reduced my workload to half or less of what it was when I started. Then I milk it for 8-12 months before quitting for another job with a starting salary the same as my current. I'm on my third cycle of this now, just gave my employer a 6-month commitment for another $300/mo. Going to split Mar 1st. Feels good man.

>>35178513
You must have some nice rifles
care to post?

>>35175765
Jesus. This shit again. Even if you lose it forever, use your expensive guns. (You won't lose it forever).

>>35178513
>fuck references
What industry?

>>35178346
No, I just need an upper receiver. Nothing else.

>>35178563
Ytho

File: IMG_20170915_191926.jpg (3MB, 4048x3036px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4048x3036px

Good handguard for mid length .50 Beowulf upper?

>>35178563
ahhhhh, nm. their rail and receiver are one piece as you saw. idk if the sell the defender 2000 upper.

File: deeplydisturbed.jpg (8KB, 234x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 234x200px

>>35177109
>>35177120
yes, it does porn too...

>>35178596
>50 memewolf
Enjoy your 20 yard effective range

File: IMG_20170421_175357.jpg (4MB, 2340x4160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2340x4160px

>>35178543

Eh, sure. Here's true raifu.

I feel like this is a thinly veiled "noguns" post, but that's the cost of being anon I guess.

>>35178556
>fuck references

Not at all, although I don't actually list references by names on my resume. Just the company, what I did there, some fluff about how much more profitable I made them, and years of employment. Makes them ask me for references in the interview if they care that much. At any rate, I have letters of recommendation from my last few employers.

Anyway, sales and marketing. Started in the firearms industry, currently in insurance. Before marketing I was doing manual labor in the oil business and decided I wanted a desk job. Working my way back up to the same kind of pay I used to make, but with a 40 hour schedule, air conditioned office, and steelcase chair instead of 70 hours in fire resistant safety gear.

>>35178596
go kill something with it and wrap it's hide around the barrel

>>35178608
I will, thanks.

File: 13omxv.jpg (48KB, 259x221px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 259x221px

>>35175851

Just read the thread and the CS sounded pretty horrible, assuming the OP was telling the truth.
Everyone's got lemons, but at that price, if their mount shits the bed and mangles my upper, I'd expect them not to tell me to fuck off.
What QD cantilever mount does one even buy, then, since apparently ADM, Bobro and Larue are all shit, just in different ways?

>>35178513
>_>
Hmm

File: 20170722_100856 (2017x1135).jpg (1MB, 2017x1135px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2017x1135px

>>35178463
>>35178469
>>35178470
2 weeks

also, the other job got approved so i might just quit this one after the agreed 2-months and just do the other job(same boss).

i may actual be able to pay off my CC within a year

>>35178629

Get yourself a GDI mount my man.

I've got a LaRue ACOG mount on my AR and haven't had any issues with it, but picked up a GDI on sale for the SCAR. I think it's a better mount. If they have a product that will work for my application, they'll be my first choice for any future mount needs.

>>35178579
Because I'm going to have a KAC rail. No need for an MRP

>>35178597
Probably just go with a Rainier or Vltor

>>35175851
At least that guy can get a new rail, I'd be in a rage if that happened to my rifle.

>>35178683
2 weeks is too soon, but if you want to ask go for it.

>>35178692
The only forged uppers worth getting minutely autistic for is Diemaco and KAC. Just get a MUR like the rest of the cool kids

File: DSC04382 (2).jpg (1MB, 3802x2904px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3802x2904px

>>35178629
Heeeeeey you're here.

>>35178689 is right, GDI is pretty cool for the ACOG.

>>35178705
Just get a better built mount than bobro.
Fucking phillips screw recoil lug

File: 20170915_164305.jpg (2MB, 2268x2519px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2268x2519px

>>35178705
i was half joking about the raise, i agreed to work for a minimum of 1 month at 15/hr to learn how to do the job and he said after that if i like it i can stay long term, so all talk to him about wages and work in 2 weeks but we also have the other job that pays more and is easier.

i just need to learn how to weld so i can start making good money.

>>35178689
>>35178732
>$570 for the cantilever
>probably weighs ~500g

Yeah, I think I'll just take my chances with the Bobro.

>>35178746
I am but that pic hurts the eyes tho.

File: 21744891_10155502233041421_1241283097_o.jpg (66KB, 1184x720px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1184x720px

>>35178782
What optic are you looking a mount for my fellow eurofag ?

File: welds-by-scott-raabe-12.jpg (97KB, 640x628px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 640x628px

Did someone say welding porn?

File: bad-weld-01a08.gif (58KB, 300x271px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 300x271px

Or was i mistaken?

File: IMG_7190.jpg (2MB, 1868x2317px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1868x2317px

>>35177988
I was pretty disappointed when I bought my last flip front from them. First one came in a cool KAC box, this one was just in a clear plastic bag

>>35178720
That's what I've new leaning towards. Just not sure how it will match. I guess I can oil it to maybe make it closer

File: durr1.jpg (2MB, 2289x1345px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2289x1345px

>>35178800

Already have it mounted, I'm done pissing away money for guns. Mostly, anyway.

>>35178683
>>35178779
>that weld

Like I said, anyone can pull the trigger and lay a bead. Be glad you're getting paid for what is essentially an apprenticeship.

>>35178834
How's that muzzle device?

>>35178815
whats the left muzzle break??

>Gf was cheating on me for 2 months
This city was a mistake, it's women are whores

Anyone selling an M952v?

>>35178844
you want sum dik, bby.

>>35178863

Great at stabilization and recoil+flash mitigation, but still just as loud and obnoxious as traditional brakes.

>>35178891
shid

>>35175456
>putting together ar lower
>just lost rear retaining pin spring
>ill never complete this build

>>35178891
>trusting women
>ever
Your mistake

File: Tay.jpg (93KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 640x960px

>>35178891
That sucks

>>35178601
Link? Full name?

>>35178891
>the juxtaposition of shitty blog news and asking about parts for your project

Couldn't help but laugh, you'll be fine I think

>>35178951

Come on retard, you're giving anons a bad name. Literally just follow the post chain up.

Tacticool Taryn.

Fucking apply yourself next time.

File: IMG_7055.jpg (1MB, 2398x3027px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2398x3027px

>>35178876
Whatever comes stock on the DD M4A1. Just a DD extended flash hider I think. It's going to be getting changed out to either pic related or a 4p

>>35178951
Her youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh8gVW1fiiU-PFyLLO5i0Eg/videos
Her Insta: https://www.instagram.com/tacticool_taryn/
Find the porn yourself.

File: 1500656398802.png (437KB, 654x473px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 654x473px

>>35178986
>her

>>35178972
>>35178986
I can't find the porn is my problem. I found the YouTube and insta already

>>35178891
I've got one I might sell. Has a cracked lens though. Works fine.

What do they go for?