Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 986. page

>>34227771
I think that it is a rifle

>>34227771
A rifle I'm going to have to smuggle in from Canada inside my anus.

Neat rifles. Kind of expensive though

Throws mud at it.

>>34227653
Get out of here Glock, you aren't relevant anymore. Even the Hi Point is better than you.

>>34227659
It's Super Effective!

File: IMG_0403.png (1MB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1242x2208px

This what that nigger Nicholas wrote a year ago. I do t have Facebook so I can't post a better quality

>>34227402
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>34227402
Not to defend them because I don't care either way but delays will turn out better in the long run than releasing a shitty initial product.

Nice try Russia

File: 1485688684977.jpg (186KB, 669x1000px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 669x1000px

Why would you want to be a spook? Being white is so much better.

File: 1487514417998.jpg (377KB, 1264x1885px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 1264x1885px

>>34227228
>Hey /k/. I wanna be a spook

Try Chicago

>>34227148
the nascent iodine not working for you?

>>34227186
Iodine does not stop bleeding...

I'd prefer Woundseal, only $8.50 for 4 packs. I've used it before and works pretty good.

File: varg.png (528KB, 1480x1074px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 1480x1074px

>>34227109
*Charges while yelling incoherently*

File: my eyes, my eyes.gif (3MB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x320px

>>34227109
Psssh nothing personal, ted.

File: hqdefault.jpg (40KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 480x360px

>>34227109
>laughter stops

>>34227108
Why not use a pistol?

>>34227169
wet powder

>>34227183
Keep your powder dry then, getting it wet is a flogging offense.

>>34227075
>not sure if breddy gud or absolutely disgusting

>>34227075

NYET carbine is fine.

>pronouncing it "car-bean"

It's "car-bean"

Like carbide or combine

Learn to read you fucks.

>>34227048
I'm rocking a 62" 55# Recurve. What weight is your bow and do you have anywhere to use it?

>>34227048
like any other projectile really...go out with it and start practicing. I need to go out with mine again my self lol

>>34227086
It's a 50lb draw. I can shoot it in my yard.

It's still pretty good, since it also vents and expands enough gas to turn supersonic ammo into subsonic before leaving the suppressor.

>>34226856
The MP5SD is designed to work with standard super-sonic 9mm. the barrel is ventilated to slow the round down to sub sonic before it even reaches the suppressor. I don't know the data on it, but let's just say they are quiet.

An integral suppressor is going to be better than a detachable one and an automatic or semi-automatic action is always going to be noisier than a manual action.

File: 20170526_175606-1.jpg (2MB, 2421x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2421x1836px

>>34226787
yaaasssssss

Because the marines weren't fighting the Germans. The jews prioritized the Germans as the top threat, so everyone fighting the top threat needed the best and most.

>>34226686
Because they preferred them as simple, reliable, proven weapons. They tested Garands and found they did not work when immersed in sand and sea water.

>>34226740
But they had mediocre stuff like BARs and Shermans, few SMGs until the cheap Grease Gun, had to haul a Browning MG and tripod around etc.

Well, attack helicopters have infrared cameras and conceivably out-range MANPADS.

Is there an actual number for AH-64's lost to MANPADS?

>>34226676
Hard if the ground shooter is concealed.

>>34226702
Waiting in concealment until point blank against helicopters has been a successful technique for various kinds of irregular anti-air attacks. The downside is that the shooter is dead if there are more helicopters near that aren't shot down, or if the shooter can't relocate before reenforcement (more helicopters/infantry/missiles) hit their slocation.

Scho ka kola never had amphetamines.

>>34226684

I see that claim everywhere though.

>>34227769
I see claims that airliners spew magical chemtrails and that nazis live in the hollow earth, that doesn't make them true.

I think there's two entirely separate issues here. Or maybe three.

First is the usefulness of the super-carrier in general. I haven't got a clue.

Then there's the issue of having all these new systems introduced all at once. I'm not sure it's such a bad idea really, at the moment at least. Sure, that one ship is most likely going to be delayed, expensive, and with a lot of Gremlins running around. But assuming you do want a future carrier force you'll need to update your tech at some point, so since WW3 isn't in full swing at the moment, maybe you may as well get it all out through the door in one go?

And finally regardless of how good or bad idea the ship is, the development and building can of course have been horribly mismanaged.

>>34226576
Jesus fucking christ, what an ignorant post.

> warisboring
Oh I see, you're a retarded chimp. Do us a favor and kill yourself.

>>34226576
>There are major problems and fuck-ups with the EMALS system, the arrestor system and electrical power systems.

A natural thing with all new tech, but there's no comparison between steam and EMALS.

>Thay are hugely expensive and highly vulnerable to weapons which America's potential adversaries have in abundance.

Same as every other warship.

>They look impressive and are used to fly the flag around the world but in reality are only good for bombing Third World countries. In any serious war they will be kept well out of range of the enemies, aircraft, missiles, mines and subs and will therefore be effectively useless along with their vastly expensive escort fleets.

Personal assertion.

>https://warisboring.com/how-not-to-build-an-aircraft-carrier/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark
>Warisboring

Link disregarded.