Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 971. page

File: 14955512912930.jpg (190KB, 1024x400px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1024x400px

>>34244069
shameless self bump

File: TFB-AK-107-Animation.gif (19KB, 475x143px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 475x143px

Sorry but Russia already destroyed west in arms race with this

File: 14955512912981.jpg (174KB, 1024x365px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1024x365px

>>34244191
balance system was invented by an American though

my point is Russian gun after ww2 always lack ergonomic compare to the West

File: dreamdoubles_beretta_F.jpg (67KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x400px

I'll start

Beretta
>luxury shotguns for waterfowl hunting
>92 series

In my opinion Beretta is known for making pretty guns, on old designs. They only just recently made a striker pistol and its pretty unremarkable. Even their popular polymer pistol before that was a classic S/DA hammer fired. They don't even make ARs because they arn't non proprietary non pretty guns.

File: heckler-and-koch.jpg (40KB, 800x550px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 800x550px

Heckler & Koch

>mp5
>USP

HK seams to be the go too manufacturer for sub machine guns and high end pistols that would be appropriate for special forces and paramilitary organizations. From what I see they only just recently started getting government contracts for plain service weapons, mostly it seams they contract out production to smaller organizations that need more specialized weapons.

File: fnwin_by_venomemf-d6lha0f.png (1MB, 1186x673px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1186x673px

FN Herstal

>FN Scar
>FN 5.7
>makes M16s and machine guns for US military
>Muh FN hammer forged AR barrel

Seams like FN makes great ARs that arn't overpriced. Their pistols are all completely unremarkable, they seam to stick to service rifles and machine guns. Focusing on military sales means you sort of get military grade manufacturing standards on your AR. They've also invented and designed a lot of weapons from the ground up. 5.7, f2000 ect.

File: DSC_0148.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

All ingravings are removed

>>34243871
>>34243879
>German
>Numbers are in English

Ok so british Tank?
Airplane?

mines are still a thing?

>>34243791
My layman's guess would be a combination of sonar and depth charges.

>>34243791
>PING
>PING
>PING
that's how

*hardcore feelings intensifies*

Stop being criminals and/or faggits.

>>34243782
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYwd0Wus5Ik

>>34243723
THE SON OF A AUTISTIC MANCHILD, AND A AMERICAN WHITE TAIL DEER. HE IS DEERMAN!

Bill Ruger.

A multmillionaire gun company owner who lobbies the government for gun control that gives him a total monopoly. Just like he did in real life with the CA pistol market.

>>34243723
Mud.

Also, the harder you pull the trigger the stronger the bullet is fired

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDnEkFSMRik

>INB4 painful elbow
not even 1 m/s increase

>>34243611
Was no one posting something you could post your sooper original shitpost to as a response so you decided to make a thread specifically for it?

>>34243572
Your rounds should be ejecting in the same direction at a consistent distance away every time if your shooting stance and how you hold the gun is consistent. As your springs wear they will eject further and if you notice that, thats when you change your springs.

>>34243726
Is that an all or nothing thing? Wouldn't the spent casings eject further and further as the spring gradually wears over time?

>>34243767
Yes thats what i said. As the springs wear they will become weaker, your slude will move faster making your riubds eject farther. A new recoil spring with a new hammer spring or striker spring should work together in to slow slide movement enough the eject round at about 5-8 feet away in a handgun. Anything more means your springs are weak and is enough to get new springs since your slide is moving too fast and will be battering the frame. Anything less and your gun may not cycle properly because the springs are too strong.

The pic has a caption in the top left that answers your question

>>34243501
I think they wanted to be as radical a change as FO1 to FO 2, or 2 to 3

>>34243513

>Knows nothing about guns
>Creates a reliable drum-fed magazine

A resourceful wastelander with no knowledge of guns would barely go bast a slamfire weapon.

A resourceful wastelander who does have knowledge of guns would just start producing Greaseguns or Stens.

Why the hell would I want a gun that is nothing like the original at all? It doesnt use the same action, it doesnt have the same proportions, and the stampings on it dont even come close to replicating the original.
All it has going for it, is the fact that it looks vaguely like an StG from 30ft away.
If the HMG people cared about that project at all they could and should have done so much better.

File: download.jpg (5KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 200x200px

>>34243489
most the parts are interchangeable with the original STG-44, however obviously because of the limitation of full auto, and them making it available in different cartridges, the receiver is much different. And because of this, their CEO even said, "this is not an STG-44, its an HMG STG". If you get it kurz chambered, full auto, and a darker wood for its furniture, there would be minute differences.

>>34243508
He stated it was the "HMG StG" only after receiving a shit ton of flak over how stupid it looks.
Face it, they promised a new StG clone that looked historically accurate and after they got enough pre orders said "fuck it" and thru this piece of shit out.

/pol/* sorry on a mobile

>>34243328
We got raped.

>>34243
gulf state national servicemen no joke saw three guys sharing one shower plus a guy got gang raped in a watch tower by three other dudes

Just lie like the rest of them do.

To be honest, the market is so saturated with ex-mil looking for work in PMCs you'd be unlikely to get in. You might be more switched on than many ex mil but these companies are fairly poorly run and cut costs at every corner. A big cost cut is training, hence why they go for people who already have basic and maybe advanced skillets trained to military standards.

I've got a few mates in a firm in Iraq after they left (Britfag army) and you're not missing much. Also, the money has fallen through the floor after the peaks in 2009 when guys were getting paid £400 a day to man a radio for a PMC.

File: Atlas_troops1.jpg (289KB, 1441x960px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1441x960px

>>34243307
Join atlas and get a free exoskeleton

>>34243307
Hard. Why would a PMC hire you over literally thousands of applicants with military and combat experience? The US and other forces have been at war for literally over a decade. There are dudes applying with 5-10 years of combat experience, and all kinds of high dollar military training. Saying "I'm in shape and motivated!" isn't much competition against a guy with 6 deployments and a Ranger Tab.

The only modern time people without experience were getting hired in decent amounts was at the veeeeerrrrry beginning of the Iraq war, when merely having LEO or some other experience made you stand out.

>>34243258
You could see a therapist and lose access to funs, or you can kill yourself.

>>34243274
Bullshit, I've have an extensive history of mental illness but have learned to successfully manage it through therapy and medication. My access to firearms has never come into question because I've sought treatment.

>>34243258

Stop playing ArmA.

File: bfb71f65ly1feukxxztg1j20dy0cemz4.jpg (71KB, 502x446px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 502x446px

Prototype hypersonic missile testbed testing the scramjet engine.

File: 800px-Standard_Missile-3_launch.jpg (112KB, 800x1244px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 800x1244px

nice

So who'd they steal it from this time?