Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 909. page

>>34230251
Won't work for the same reason mosquitoes don't carry the AIDS. They're body temp is too low, and the virus dies within a few hours

>>34230301
thats ok, the squitos can transmit plenty of other blood-borne diseases

a lot of fantasy scifi things end up being precursors to possible future prototypes, not just gun related. except this idea is kinda retarded outside of a vydia

File: Dale.jpg (20KB, 307x352px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 307x352px

>>34229883
Are there two chambers?

How does the gun in the back shoot through the chamber of the gun in the front when they're combined into a rifle?

If the mag is fed in through the back, where is the gun in the front getting ammo from when it's detached?

If there are two triggers, what happens if you pull them both at once when the guns are combined?

When detached, the front gun no longer has a stock and the back gun does not have a sight, so why are they being held in the same position?

It's not completely impossible if it's like a pair of railguns or something, so when the things are put together, you have a gun that takes a projectile from the back section's magazine and sends it down the barrels of two guns so it goes faster.

It's also not impossible with chemical propellants, provided you're using caseless ammo and you have separate feeding mechanisms for the propellant block and the projectile. You could also make it so that a propellant block from the front section magazine can be fired at just the right time to accelerate the projectile some more, but I don't think the muzzle energy gains would be worth the weight and complexity and the massive pain in the ass reloading becomes.

However, unless it is a railgun and/or you're fighting a zillion small animals AND a few man-sized ones in confined spaces, I can't imagine why you would want to carry that thing as your main gun. Way heavier than a gun that's basically just the back section with a longer barrel.

The sights on that gun, however, are shit.

better than nothing

>>34229181
Pretty much the bare minimum for CC honestly.
Not bad, but far from ideal in almost every respect.

Its fine.

nevermind, i found it! It sort of strays into /pol/ territory, but if you want to read it here it is

http://lonelymachines.org/2016/12/29/it-looks-like-private-ffls-are-a-thing-again/

>>34228972

dog perfection

File: 19050502_108792436395672_144366563921756160_n.jpg (98KB, 1080x835px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1080x835px

>>34229003
Dog Perfection

File: image.jpg (36KB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 854x480px

>>34228972
Hello.

They're P51 designed for use as ATG attack planes to stop heavy ground vehicles like Tanks, APCs and your mom

>>34228920
>fpbp

>>34228920
>P51s used for ground attack
Oh. You mean the A-36?

For the exact same reasons as when you posted the exact same question three days ago.

>>34228583
They started out as kindof a gimmicky cheapo company that people dindt take seriously

But today theyre generally just selling overpriced factory made stuff that is targetted at people who really dont understand what theyre looking for. Other companies make the same products with better steel and better mechanical parts for less, cold steel mass produces all the wonky obsolete designs that other companies dont but thats about it.

You cant buy a bechmade chinese war sword, but benchmade working knife folders are probably the better money spent

>>34228630
thread/

>>34228409
Yes

I was thinking about one day(sometime in the far future) being able to easily build full-size accurate replicas of WW2 aircraft once such manufacturing tech becomes available and cheap enough to make it feasible.

>>34228471
Good luck, but the market is tiny.
Most people looking to buy millitary aircraft want the real thing.
They are also few and far between.
But, there are two WWII planes still in quasi production. The piper cub and the storch.
The storch (besides a small production run in the 70s) is only built at a 3/4 scale

>>34228338
It's a Mk.III Doorstop.

>>34228367
Mk. III? What's that, all I can find is airsoft shit when I look it up

File: aleks.png (379KB, 528x439px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 528x439px

>>34228388

File: 1492551908663.jpg (13KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 320x320px

Do you want to blast bigger holes in shit, or poke lil' holes in shit?

Home defense?
Hunting?
Plinking?
Range gun?

And remember, a thread died for this.

Marlin model 60. Can't go wrong.

>>34228305
I want to blast stuff way more than plink but the small caliber would be cheaper. I want the one that would be way more fun which I think would be the 12 gauge.

>>34227834
kys

>>34227834
This was low effort man, even for shitposting.