[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Extra juicy! | Home]

Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 6. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: mm3.jpg (860KB, 7360x4912px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
mm3.jpg
860KB, 7360x4912px
Stanislav Petrov, the man at the centre of the 1983 nuclear attack false alarm died quietly a few months ago. It seems only now people in the West are realising he died and are running stories on it. As usual, the media playing up the 1983 incident at "the closest we've ever been to nuclear war". Looking at it, I'm not convinced however particularly when Able Archer and the Cuban Missile Crisis exist.

I suspect a real out-of-the-blue attack would not start with a few ICBMs launched from the US but instead would start with attacks on radars and other c&c from SLBMs and possibly Pershing 2s. The USSR would not be so itching to commit national suicide and launch on warning, instead they would ride through the attack and retaliate counter value.

I'm certain if Petrov had handed the information off higher they would have made the same conclusion he did and (rightly) believe this "attack" was lacking all the hallmarks of an out-of-the-blue attack.

Maybe Oppenheimer can add to this.
33 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>35191583
Most likely they would have thought this was an attempted decapitation strike on Moscow, capitalizing (heh) on the assumption that a "true" strike would involve everything being launched. (See Pearl Harbor)
>>
Seems like Vasili Arkhipov is the more appropriate person for "dude who literally prevented WWIII", but nice to see that in Petrov's case they had multiple levels for that.
>>
>>35191640
Except a decapitation strike would be suicide without also expending thousands of weapons to destroy the USSR's ICBM arsenal.

If you're going to decapitate the enemy you may as well go all in and get the rest of your targets.

File: ets-42-12-2.jpg (152KB, 751x536px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ets-42-12-2.jpg
152KB, 751x536px
>Light and easily concealable

>pretty cheap compared to other models ($400)

>sexy, fits nice in hand

Is it worth it or should I look somewhere else? I want a compact in 380 or 9mm but if the price was right maybe a .45
24 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
File: IMG_5107.jpg (23KB, 236x314px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
IMG_5107.jpg
23KB, 236x314px
I'd recommend a g26 instead
>>
>>35191230
Can get a Shield in 9, .40, or .45. Should be sub $400 for 9/.40.
>>
File: faggot hat.jpg (62KB, 520x520px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
faggot hat.jpg
62KB, 520x520px
>>35191299
Not everyone eats as much as you do fatass, my hands are too small (they're normal size) to carry a double stack

ITT- Cartridges you wish existed. I'll start:
>.40 S&W necked to .30-.27 caliber with .22 saboted bullet
>5.56 performance in any common handgun/PDW
Sabots are underrated.
21 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
something like a 17. hmr or 22. but the casing is a thicker, but smaller than a 9mm and has a case thats as long as a 7.62x39 and a bullet that's as thick as the case so a thin but long round so you can stack them deep in a magazine without sacrificing powder but the round is still a lower power round but high velocity.
>>
>>35191062
9x39
/thread
>>
>>35191062
You probably wouldn't get the same velocity due to the barrel lengths of pistols. Might not be as effective as you'd hope.

File: sabaton pic.png (779KB, 1264x637px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
sabaton pic.png
779KB, 1264x637px
What could have been done differently in World War 1/The Great War that would have ended the conflict earlier and prevented so many lives from being lost? Specifically, what could have caused one side to succeed over the others much, much earlier, regardless of side.

I study this conflict a lot and it just seemed to me to be at the worst intersection of warfare technology and conscription.

Pic and video related.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nV-Gi8aKoBw
22 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
If Germany had built a bigger navy, they would have starved the UK into submission instead of the UK starving them.

Also, the Ottomans were severely lacking in having a navy as well. They owned 3 straits, they should have been able to prevent the Dardanelles campaign.
>>
>>35191040
If the Germans managed to close the weak point in their lines at the Battle of the Marne and prevented the British from cutting into them, they *might* have been able to force France into submission and take Paris. Everybody was exhausted at that point, and if the French had lost at the Marne there would have been nothing left for them to do.
>>
if the british had allowed the colonial troops to be under their own command that would have done wonders for the allies. if you do reading about what the australians and the canadians did at the end of the war it was insane. or even better, instead of putting general haig as overall commander, put Monash as commander. monash was a fucking mad man who under stood the war and the germans, two things that haig lacked.

seriously, the commonwealth forces were/are really under rated because of the failures of the british command.

File: ncstar-logo.png (329KB, 640x542px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ncstar-logo.png
329KB, 640x542px
Ok /k/ ├╝berpoorfag here. Whats the rundown with cheap optics? Are they any good or should they be completely avoided? Pic related is one brand that you can get in the cheap, but will they hold up to innawoods use?

I keep hearing Chinese optics have come a long way, but I really don't know if they're any good to spend my small amount of fun money
14 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>35190201
NcStar is fucking trash. Like, if I owned an airsoft gun I wouldn't put NcStar shit on it. I bought some BUIS from them once on a lark, and I swear I could hear them rattling when I moved the rifle around.
>>
>>35190201
Ok, Ncstar is a hard pass. don't waste your neetbux. Chinese products getting better means like. Primary arms and vortex products are actually pretty decent at the 150-200 dollar range. (for normal plink/mall ninja uses) But cheap shit will always be cheap shit. They might hold zero (woo) but you won't get any use out of their "high end features" like mil scopes and dial-able turrets. unfortunately you get what you pay for in most if not all instances.
>>
File: 593456.jpg (66KB, 880x660px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
593456.jpg
66KB, 880x660px
The TRS25 is the best bang-for-buck RDS I've encountered yet.

Got mine for $40

File: unpopularguns.jpg (99KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
unpopularguns.jpg
99KB, 1200x1200px
I'm trying to find a gun that is made from 1880-1960 and doesn't commonly come to mind quite like a Garand or Nugget. What does /k/ suggest?
40 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
>>35190192
Enfield. Swiss K31.
>>
File: 3.jpg (534KB, 2304x1728px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
3.jpg
534KB, 2304x1728px
1895
>>
>>35190192
RSC-1918/1917
MAS-36
MAS-49/56
SVT-40
Winchester 1895 lever nugget

File: 1471222314994.jpg (869KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1471222314994.jpg
869KB, 1920x1080px
Hey /k/
Sorry for the nooby question, but what is a good starter rifle for extended home defense?
Very, very, very tight budget. So things like "go to gun fair to buy" and the like is also helpful.

I just went through Irma and things almost got nasty in our neighborhood due to looting, and people trying to steal goods.
I have a ruger 10/22 but I want something actually damaging. Im also not convinced a 10/22 has any amount of scare factor to deter people.
It also jams consistently, so if anybody has a fix for that let me know. I use CCI ammo with it but still get jams. Maybe a new ejector?
17 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>35189942
AR-15s are as cheap as they are ever going to be right now. Cheap AR like an M&P-15 or PSA. Decent mag, flashlight. And that's it.
>>
A shotgun
>>
>>35189971
You're drunk again, Mr. Biden, go home.

File: 0916172116.jpg (3MB, 2976x2976px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
0916172116.jpg
3MB, 2976x2976px
So, /k/, how'd I do with my first firearm purchase?
Feels good to hasguns, imo.
24 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
>>35189745
You could have done a hell of a lot worse than a sp. Shoot it yet?
>>
File: 1504205916020.jpg (30KB, 600x422px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1504205916020.jpg
30KB, 600x422px
>>35189745
Good job buddy, revolvers are fucking great. now clean your desk, it is disgusting.
>>
>>35189745
Good choice. dont get the point of a small frame with a four inch

File: Stag-3g-3.jpg (51KB, 504x336px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Stag-3g-3.jpg
51KB, 504x336px
How do the angled sights work on 3-gun setups?
28 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
>>35189380
Probably pretty ok.
>>
>>35189434
no i mean like, how do they function properly
>>
>>35189466
"close enough"

Why were Jap tanks in WWII so bad? They were good at enginerring - their planes and ships were good. Pic related is the pinnacle of their tank design late war and only a handful were built. They obviously had limited resources, espeically fuel, but they knew the value of tanks from fighting the Red Army on the Mongolian border in the 1930s so you would think they would have taken them more seriously.
25 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
They had enough resources to make either their army or navy awesome and the other would be below average. Being a pacific island nation they chose to put their resources into their navy.
>>
They really had no enemy with good tanks. Nationalist China had a few FT-17's, but Khalkin Gol reminded them they had to at least vaguely try.

But they decided to go for fast and small which was good against T-26's and BT-5's but not so against M3 Stuarts and M4 Shermans. By the time they had modern armor and 75mm guns, it was '45 and they decided to keep it for homeland defense.
>>
File: OI_Model.jpg (42KB, 800x413px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
OI_Model.jpg
42KB, 800x413px
>>35189349
No money put into new designs. Tanks were not a major part of their doctrine by that point of the war as the major land battles in China had already been won with tankettes that were in essence refined version of the breadboxes you find in the Middle East. Had there been any major battles on the mainland, you can bet they would be cranking out Type 3s in mass.
And actually, they did try experimenting with the OI, trying to utilize the same philosophy that drove their naval design: single superior vehicles that were stronger than the mass-produced competition. But it was impractical for the obvious reason that it could not really be transported where they needed it.

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.