Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 4887. page

>>27800539
Thats a bit too good a piece of work for Bubba.

Woulduse/10
Now the CBRPS products are truly ghastly.

Does this have any benefits / drawbacks or is it primarily an aesthetic change?

that is a british flag m8

>>27800536
It looks Australian to me.

File: Pattern_1907_cleaned_&_affixed.jpg (564KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

564KB, 768x1024px

>>27800525
>hacked-off flash hider
>cut-down magazine
>Williams rear sight
How appropriately keked.

France has a big boy carrier, so France

>most plausible war scenario on /k/ ever
I'd go with the frogs. Because there is no way in hell i'd ever work with the maccaronis. I also think they would win the ground war, though the Italian surface fleet would effectively control the mediterranean sea.

Since this scenario is laughably one-sided in favor of France, I'm gonna tweak it a bit.

Switzerland has decided that what the cheese-eating surrender monkeys produce is an affront to all cheesemakers and break their centuries long neutrality to join in on Italy's side.

Oh, and Liechtenstein sends their 3 dudes, too.

>>27800459
If you love two women, pick the second one.
If you truly loved the first one, there wouldn't be a second one.

>>27801026
I'll eventually get both. I have a Sig P239 and want a P226 to go along with it. But I also have a S&W 442 and want a nice S&W .357 magnum to go along with that as well.

I just can't decide what to get first because the other might be a while before I pick it up.

A P226 is the more prwctocalt weapon. If you're looking for a practical handgun for defensive or training use, buying a Model 27 over a modern autoloader would be silly.

If you're looking to make the purchase about collectibility, 'soul,' casual range fun, or class, then I can't convince you to not to get an M27.

There are fewer fun things than spending an afternoon at the range with a revolver.

The fact the spoon and pin are missing is a pretty good indication that it's used.

If it's been used already then it's not dangerous at all. It's just an empty shell.

>let's play with uxo the thread

>>27800284

based on what?

We don't need to be superior, we need everyone to think we are superior

>>27800357
Nobody does

>>27800097
this isnt call of duty

My dick

>>27800097
Slingshot

>Condo
>On the top floor of a 80 story building.
>pretty big, only one on floor 80
>nothing will bring the building down
In case of emergency
>get cement mixer from closet
>get concrete
>block elevator shaft
>weld steel beams over staircase exit
>no entrances
>only exit is out window or cutting through steel beams
>keep an emergency chute just incase
>invaders/zombies/whatever come for me
>sit comfortably, enjoying my food supplies.
>water purifier so I can turn my piss into water
>rooftop greenhouse where I plant stuff in my shit
>rain barrels on roof to collect water
>my supply of food will never run out
>keep weapons and ample ammo for all scenarios stocked
>whenever I'm bored, pick off enemies from the rooftop of the building
>the entire floor is set up with C4 so if I bail by parachute the floor goes out too
>exercise machines to stay fit
>2 .50 BMGs mounted on roof to deal with pesky helicopters
>if for some reason my food supply diminishes, raid floor 79, 78, etc.
>I'm ready

Go to Fort Knox, live inside the vault, as it is empty.

>>27800092
little guns tucked away around many easy to get to but hidden areas of the house

>>27800007
The SS-18 Satan loaded with a 25mt warhead

A single project pluto

>>27800007
Kirov class maybe?

>>27799885
Because the treaty that saw the North stop fighting required the US to leave.

The war wasn't lost militarily, rather politically. It was dumb-fuck hippies who thought the Soviets were peace-nicks like themselves that told the Soviets that if they held out the US would eventually have to pack up and leave.

File: RT.jpg (239KB, 316x833px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 316x833px

'Battle' is an outdated concept

Rolling Thunder was a complete and utter failure

>>27799885
Because the democrats wouldn't let us. It would have screwed up their anti war stance if we had won.

>>27799848
You and your thread again, like a week ago.

As a former Grammaton Cleric , I support this thread.

File: 1366325611341.jpg (181KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1000x667px

>>27799848
No, but learning to fight with a gun is.

They're obsolete desu, they only thing they do better than an F-35 is have a slighter lower RCS

>booby trap every jet with a nuclear bomb

Here's your reply.

>>27799836
>They're obsolete desu, they only thing they do better than an F-35 is have a slighter lower RCS

An order of magnitude less, in fact. Much faster and much more maneuverable, too. Too bad the entire avionics suite needs to be re-engineered since all of the key contractors either no longer make the parts used in the F-22, or went out of business completely.

No, it was made from cardboard and a gutted Cessna

>>27799713
Nah they did use fiberglass, gotta give them credit for at least being decent hobbyest modelists.

>>27799713
I did forget to mention it only allows double amputee pilots to fit in it.

>>27799666
I don' think it's destabilising.

Either it works which means ICBMs and SLBMs are ineffectual which makes attacking impossible, or it doesn't work and we still have the status quo.

I agreed with the ABM treaty however in the 70s. Not because I thought the concept was a good idea but rather the technology wasn't mature enough at the time preventing an enormous amount of money being dumped into it. I'm all for it now.

>>27799677
It's not destabilizing at all. Like with any system, there's no such thing as a 100% success rate. MAD, or at least extreme damage, is still a threat since some warheads may still get through, and then for any high value targets there would be enough warheads coming in to overwhelm any ABM system in place.

>>27799702
The term you're looking for is counter-value.

Even a ABM system with a 99% success rate would still be ineffectual against counter-value attacks.

>Every single IJN battleship was sunk in one way or another
Such a waste

>>27799652
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_battleship_Mikasa#Preservation

I'm surprised she wasn't recycled into structural steel for the war effort.

File: 1446673364118.jpg (153KB, 1280x1377px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1280x1377px

>>27799636

>Is it really unbelieveable that Japan hoped for sucess in Pacific?

It's not unbelievable that they believed they could win, it's unbelievable that the German high command never told them they'd get #rekt if they attacked us and never made any great effort to give the Japs advice on logistics/A well-coordinated and officer corps