Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 4862. page

>suspects
Innocent until proven guilty
REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>27921688

>Daily news

The Enquirer has better journalism.

Not even kidding.

>>27921688
There's nothing on the 4473 that would prevent someone on a watch list from buying a gun.

And it probably wouldn't show up on a background check either.


But I'm curious, what law am I supposed to be against?

File: dUweRrI.jpg (243KB, 1074x1974px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1074x1974px

For China, it is the wish to create a base for power-projection. You have to start somewhere, and you will only have an useful carrier-capability with at least 3 carriers.

They wont be that militarily relevant in any great power war, but they could do some damage against smaller enemy states. And in support with ASBM and land-based assets, even their fewer and medium-sized carriers would add some badly needed firepower and ASW protection for their naval assets in confronting the USN, especially when keeping close to home waters.

>>27921623
>Why are so many countries building large aircraft carriers now?

For Brits it's because they're recognizing they need to get back in the game. China is trying to expand their influence while India is trying to counter-balance China.

>Whose carriers will be the best (after the US of course)?

We don't really know anything about the new China one yet. If it's just a Liaoning clone it'll be a bit of a disappointment, but not bad for an expanding nation.

The Vikrant looks good on paper but it's rather small. The Mig-29K looks good, but it's lacking some of the support aircraft that carriers should try and employ. Also lol-India.

The QE is probably the most ambitious. Whether or not you consider it the best probably depends on whether or not you're optimistic about the F-35B. I am so i'm behind it, if you don't, well, a carrier needs to be judged by it's aircraft.

>Why isn't Russia building them?

No money, and they've lost the expertise to do it.

>Aren't they increasingly vulnerable to submarines and missiles now?

This is why you build better escorts.

It's important to remember that none of these nations are aiming to tangle with an American CBG with their own CBG (especially Britain for obvious reasons). American carriers enjoy too many advantages, not just in terms of number of aircraft but also in terms of support aircraft like Growlers, Hawkeyes, and Greyhounds.

quick question, how do they get the carrier in the water once done? do they get rid of the platform surrounding it?

>>27921609
I don't think we are getting 7n6 back. Once it's gone we do t get it back

File: image.jpg (74KB, 562x600px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 562x600px

>>27921609
You must be new here.

Even though they're still good, there was a time when Arsenal was pretty much the top of e line for AKs. Back when they had the SGL series that were basically professionally converted SAIGA rifles. Which are manufactured in the same factory as military rifles in Russia.

So yes, as a base rifle, they are some of the best. How good of a converted AK it is depends on who's doing it. And ever since the sanctions were placed on Russia, they have not been imported. So the price has shot up.

>>27921609
Saiga's are good shit. 7N6 (hurr durr us ar fags will get it back after green dick ammo is saved) isn't coming back, but 5.45 is still cheap and good.
>>27921676
this
lurk more nüfag

>>27921319
L'OTAN va hocher la tete, dire que oui en effet la syrie c'est pas bien tout ça, et rien branler de plus du tout, parce que personne veut s’impliquer en dehors des USA qui ramènent (et je les en remercie) leur carrier battle group en avance. Donc pas la peine de les impliquer. Pareil pour l'UE et cette peuplade de couilles molles qui au delà des discours d'intention vont rien faire pour aider la France, mais au moins, demander aux seconds d'aider met la pression sur l'UE et sur l'absence de politique globale de défense et sécurité, ce qui permettra à l'avenir de réclamer des compensation (au hasard, la réévaluation de notre dette) et évite de chagriner les russes qui nous déroulent le tapis rouge en méditerranée orientale. Donc non, y'a pas d'article 4 ou 5 du code de l'OTAN au programme.

Pour ce qui est des guns, l'UE une fois encore, se decouvre des sentiments façon "resistants du 7 Juin 44" et vient de soumettre un projet de renforcement à l'échelle européenne des reglementation sur les armes, et c'est assez moche si ça passe comme ça.

>>27921673
Et pour ce qui est d'envoyer des troupes au sol, Hollande est loin d'être con et va pas réclamer quelque chose qu'il sait pertinemment qu'il n'obtiendra pas, ni ne peut faire tout seul.

>>27921319
>>27921673

J'avoue que le dernier discours de l'autre ministre souhaitant plus de contrôle sur les armes et une réduction de leur nombre en circulation est assez affligeant.
C'est pas comme si toutes les armes utilisées dans des attentats venaient de filières criminelles contre lesquelles on ne fait pas grand chose. Encore une fois, c'est de la poudre aux yeux et une façon de pousser en avant des lois liberticides.

Ah, tiens, d'ailleurs, ils ont chopé un type avec 176 armes et 1 tonne de munitions chez lui dans l'Est de la France (mais c'est parce que son fils a mis la main sur un de ses flingues et a accidentellement tué un de ses camarades de collège avec).

the only form of synthetic testosterone that guy looks like he is on is the semen that his boyfriend squirts into his anus

>>27921305
yes, while i was in a knew multiple people who roided. it doesnt show up on a piss test and getting big is thoroughly part of the culture.

unsure what this has to do with /k/ however.

>>27921305
yea 1/6 (marine infantry unit) was geared up throughout their entire MEU and in Djibouti and I know it gets around in small circles within the military. who cares m8

>>27921159
>ranian shills doing there usual shilling?
That.

>>27921159
It's based on North Korean technology, so I wouldn't be optimistic.

Of course! We'd be doomed!!

You know militaries keep secrets and true capabilities of submarines are almost always classified.

Look! It only has 6 sailors! It's obviously a highly advanced submarine with mostly automated systems.

>>27921147
Not until ammo costs come down.

Yeah, but she doesn't really like to shoot... I've gotten her to deprime brass for me a few times though...

>>27921142

The F-35B is a definite no because it is comparatively limited range, but the others would work just fine.

>>27921142
>>27921175
Isn't the 35C the carrier version anyway?

>>27921175

>F-35B has higher combat radius than F-18E

>I've never been in a gunfight, the thread

Police spent all their money on cool shit instead of training... Durkas spent all their time rolling around the desert shooting with a stick...

>>27921103
I haven't, have you?

10mm +P.

.44 magnum from a Ruger Redhawk. Strongest revolver frame there is, you can shoot loads as hot as you want, pretty much.

You can CC it, OC with style, home defense like a boss, and you can even hunt with it... AND put a scope on it.

Plus you can get a .44 magnum lever gun and have a rifle and pistol with matching calibers.


.45 Colt can do the same thing, though.... Plus you can get a Ruger chambered in .454, and shoot both from it while getting a .45 Colt lever gun.


Both of those can achieve amazing power levels from rifles and strong revolvers. You can literally hunt a grizzly with those revolvers, too.

>>27921042
10mm.
Takes down a bear or a man or a fishman from planet x. If it breathes it's likely not going to have a good time after it takes 135 grains at 1400 fps
It will tear anything that lives a brand new asshole to shit out it's internal organs through.
Check out the glock 20

>>27920982
Save your money and buy a Transferable UZI. These carbine versions of SMGs are not very practical, so you might as well go all out and get the real deal.

You need to bitch about the laws that force you to jump though hoops.

Bitch loudly.

If things keep going the way they are, we'll need to consult a lawyer every time we cross state lines.

I'm all for states rights but there's some things all Americans should be able to do.

>>27920982
if your concern is money just buy one
the only gun thats cost effective to build is the ar
everything else is a money pit unless youve got the tools already and intend to build multiple

>>27920980
if by shits on you mean is basically the same as
then yeah it shits on 9mm

>>27920980

> it shits on 9mm

lol

it's +P 9mm with less capacity

>>27921000
They make 40 +p as well smart ass

You're still gonna be in the carried by six camp with a baton, mate.

>>27920960
Just let Muhammad or Rashad have his way with you.

>>27920960
Carry pepper spray m8

Meta threads, definitely.

This means YOU, faggot.

>>27920912
>pepe

>>27920912

Here's a start

>frog posters

git out

>>27920736
Phantom

>>27920736
In what respect?

Fastest? Cheapest? Tightest turning? Capable of causing the most butthurt?

Because the Arrow would win the latter category.

>>27920736
Certainly not that one with it's lack of a gun and sub-par missiles.