/k/
What are the legal issues of driving a semi truck and possessing a valid cpl?
If i cross state lines with my weapon can i get into trouble if i get pulled over? What about if i have to use my weapon? I did some research, but all i found was a report from a few years ago that said the feds don't really have am opinion. I just want top make sure the rules are the same for me as they are for everyone else.
Pic related. Is my carry piece.
you'll need a ccw or equivalent in every state that you plan to carry in, if you want to do it legally.
>>28437418
Even with the reciprocate laws?
My cpl is from Michigan. The only state i go to that doesn't recognize it is Illinois. In that case i leave it home.
>>28437277
Keep it, carry it, use it when neccessary.
Regardless of how legal it is, you will end up incarcerated for a short amount of time after you defend yourself. That's our legal system, sucks but its better than being dead.
/K/ How do you stop the booty infiltrate?
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq0ztaCwb-A
I always wear a Rapex in my ass and throat.
>>28437226
IS his accent for real, or can he get away with t because he's asian.
>>28437226
>I don't wanna footlong inside the Phuc Long
Top kek
Pic related
the f2000 was a smooth sailor. This shit was a flop however
>>28437044
That shit was just a G36 in new plastic. Oh.........never mind.
>>28437044
>posts the fish gun
>not ironically hating it
woo boy memes abound
So here is my retarded idea /k/:
>Take a Ruger Blackhawk in .45 Colt (Bisley for ease of cocking)
>Have a gunsmith install a Nagant style cam to press the cylinder into the forcing cone
This would likely make cocking the hammer pretty heavy, but it should be easier in the Bisley style.
>thread the barrel
>used slightly recessed wadcutter .45 Colt to create the gas seal as well
Would this work? Why would it not? Is there any way it could work? Would a different revolver be more suitable? The point is to make a suppressed revolver in a somewhat decent caliber, and that is actually obtainable.
You're dumb and working off ideas from that QTDDTOT thread.
You do realize that revolver doesn't even have room behind the cylinder to put a camming arm, right?
>>28436941
Also cocking the hammer doesn't cam the cylinder forward, the trigger itself does
>>28436948
You know what to do /k/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/polls/2016/jan/4/obama-right-take-executive-action-guns/
>>28436900
>mfw he speeds up e-file for tax stamps and creates more 'loopholes' for selling
>mfw he thinks he is making it harder to get guns
>>28437060
Aikawa a cute
>>28437121
Yep
If you asked 100 women, would they give a blowjob to a Marine or Army?
This is important.
Surely you should be asking 100 women this question, and not 10,000 lonely gun-obsessed virgins?
Army maybe, as for the marine, you'd probably have to chase another marine away from his dick first.
>>28436849
False.
Army owes me. I'll let a 2 stars pass.
Title pretty much says it all.
I've been rolling with ironsights and traditional scopes for my entire life. However, I've now gotten interested in these fancier optics.
How'd you explain the differences between different models / types of these red dot / holographic sights?
What's the maximum range you can effectively use this kind of sights?
What type would you recommend for a 7.62x39 AK?
I'd be mounting it similarly as in the pic related, using a quick-mount that attach to the commie rail
only options to consider
>pa advanced micro
>aimpoint t1/t2
>combloc red dots (for the sake of clarity, consider the first two choices)
If you know what you're doing and really wanted to, you could hit up to 1,000 yards with a well built ak and decent ammo.
You can easily make 600 yard shots with ironsights and even easier with a red dot, especially something like an aimpoint with settings to holdover.
That being said, 7.62x39 does have a large drop at 550-600ish yards.
>>28436799
yuuuuup
>>28436749
You'd want to either get a low profile gas block rail for a micro dot scout mount or a railed dust cover. Anything higher like in pic you posted is going to make you have to put your fucking chin on the stock to even see through it, and they don't hold zeros very well.
For the majority of modern war (let's arbitrarily say 1914 and onward) what has been the smallest unit of men that could decide a battle, in the majority of battles?
The division? The regiment? The battalion is as far as I'm willing to go down.
>>28436515
One man. Especially if he is a machinegunner.
Okay, maybe two. The machinegunner and the feeder.
>>28436515
>what has been the smallest unit of men that could decide a battle, in the majority of battles?
Twenty.
>>28436515
I'll probably get shitted on for saying this.
My squad, marine infantry.
12 dedicated men ready to rip shit up.
We were untouchable.
Where can i get a Serb cutter glove knife like this?
I really want to own one.
>>28436441
Make one and have Serb killing competitions with your comrades
Are you aware of the Mexican sacatripe? Used for gutting sheep ..... and other warm blooded animals
>>28436441
It's a myth created by serbs
What /k/ think of Russian 'Bernardinos'?
Apparently it is their try at copying the original American MLRS but was found lacking, so they sold it to sand people.
After being used in Iraq and Syria, they found out it was not effective in small amounts, Iraq only has 10 so it is a very small number, so it means if you want battles you need a larger number which means more expensive, you can buy Tomahawks for the amount and get a good kill instead.
Second is it causes panic attacks to militia, which is bad because in a panic people disperse and is harder to hit and is bad.
Third is they found very expensive and not mobile and lighter enough. That is why they are changing tracks for wheels instead. So no Armata 'Bernardino'. HAHAHAHA
http://vestnik-rm.ru/news-4-14624.htm
This is true
Instead of putting tracks on wheels why not put on wheels all the same?
>>28436209
>Apparently it is their try at copying the original American MLRS but was found lacking, so they sold it to sand people.
Are you special?
>>28436209
>Apparently it is their try at copying the original American MLRS but was found lacking, so they sold it to sand people.
>Apparently it is their try at copying the original American MLRS
>the original American MLRS
I am not aware of a American Heavy Flamethrower system. Do enlighten me newfriend.
re: title.
just saw this, figured I'd pass it on.
>>28436113
sorry, here's a link
http://www.aimsurplus.com/product.aspx?item=MAK47P30
>>28436113
Fuck off shill.
Nah, just kidding. Thanks for sharing this.
>already have 150+ akm mags
>considering placing an order
Are MANPADS still effective against modern aircraft?
>tfw I have to wear those daily
They're so damn uncomfortable, but it's either wear them, or have blood and discharge seep through my pants constantly.
>>28436077
Holy shit man control yourself.
>>28436077
Damn, what disease is that?
Has anyone ordered from K-var recently or ever? Are they reliable? How is their customer service? I'm looking at ordering a few things from them, one of them being a model of SAM7 that doesn't seem to be in stock anywhere else. Are they just slow at updating their inventory? What can I expect?
Pic unrelated.
>>28435699
Pls halp. Obi-Wan /K/enobi, you're my only hope.
>>28435699
God you're a massive faggot.
OP sucks cocks.
>>28435786
>picking on a girl
Anyone keeping up with this? Its been almost a year since the bill passed in the SC house, I had expected to be able to go around without a permit and without worry by this time.
I have no idea how all this legal stuff works. All the info that comes up just says
>Currently residing in the House Committee on Judiciary
http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess121_2015-2016/bills/3716.htm
they'll probably just set on it :/
also does that mean i could carry without a permit legally ?
>>28435611
>also does that mean i could carry without a permit legally ?
If it becomes law, yes.
>>28435642
thank fuck
what does the law in places with 'no guns' like Britain and Australia say about EM projectile accelerating devices? i know in Australia a solder got arrested for training in public with a crude prop rifle
what does the AFT say about such devices?
a magnet can't be illegal
The ATF would likely classify it as a "destructive device."
>>28435562
Glad to see this generation of Scion owner taking their car out to a field to do /k/ shit.
>>28435562
In the UK a firearm is defined as "a lethal barrelled weapon capable of discharging a bullet, shot, missile or other projectile."