https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANllOmgJH9Y
Everything that has been said before has came to light.
>Libtards thinking adding technology will fix everything.
>Fucking magnets unlocks the gun.
Would it have been a better base than the Bf 109?
Wasn't it even more expensive for not a lot of gain?
The bubble cockpit was a plus though.
>>34746448
The He-100 was a diamond in the rough that none of the German aerospace giants were willing to polish. Later variants of the He-112 were simply modernizations of a design that would've been structurally and aerodynamically obsolete by the early forties, much like the Bf-109.
>>34746448
>>34746909
In short, no.
Does this guy speak the truth? He's an American who fought in Vietnam.
https://fredoneverything.org/
Why do those inadequate little men in Washington and New York dream of new wars? Because the empire is near a tipping point.
Washington must either either start a war in Korea, or gets faced down by the North, its carriers ignored, its bombers “sending signals” and making “shows of force” without result. For the empire this is a loss of face and credibility, and an example to others that America can be challenged.
Iran has not caved to Washington’s threats and sanctions and clearly isn’t going to. Another strategic loss, a big one, unless–the hawks seem to think–remedied by a war. Iran wants to trade with Europe and Europe likes the idea. Worse, Iran is becoming a vital part of China’s aim to integrate Europe and Asia economically. To the empire this smelñls of death. The frightened grow desperate.
China shows no signs of backing down in the South China Sea. For Washington, it is either war now, when thinks it might win, or be overshadowed as China grows.
Russia has irrevocably gotten the Crimea, is quietly absorbing part of the Ukraine, and looks as if its side is going to win in Syria. Three humiliating setbacks for the empire. Loss of control of the Mideast would be a strategic disaster for Washington.
Continued control of Europe is absolutely vital. European governments have groveled but now even they grow restless with Washington’s sanction against Russia, and European businessmen want more trade eastward. Growing trade with Asia threatens to loosen Europe’s shackles. Washington cannot allow this.
When you have militarily stupid politicians listening to pathologically confident soldiers, trouble is likely. All of these people mightreflect how seldom wars turn out as those starting them expect. Wars are always going to be quick and easy. Generals not infrequently advise against a war but, once it begins, they bark in unison.
>>34746122
wtf I want to fight a war with China now
This is so interesting, but honestly belongs more on /pol/.
>>34746122
The author writes like a man who lives in a shack in the woods and murders hookers at a professional level.
Question, is this snake oil?
>>34745965
No it's a gun.
>>34745965
You're snake oil
>>34745965
mostly. i don't buy into the barrel finish.
Are Aircraft the top of the military food chain?
It seems they're capable of destroying everything (including the dedicated AA units meant to destroy aircraft)
>>34745956
cruise missiles are top of the food chain
>>34745956
ICBMs are the top of the food chain
>>34745956
muh dick is at the top of your mom's food chain
alright milfags and leofags
What do your qualification shoots look like? And/or how has it changed since you started? What are you shooting at, from how far, for how many rounds, with what as a passing grade?
Or put more simply, what does your agency expect you to be able to do with your weapon?
Even though pic related is iconic for my dept range, we mostly shoot a bowling pin type silhouette, about equivalent to the FBI Q target.
50 round course of fire, timed with a buzzer, 5 rounds at 25, 15 at 15, 20 at 7.
>On the buzzer, two rounds, reload, one round and holster
Minimum score 40/50 in the silhouette
Overall it's pretty similar to FBI's standard.
>>34745713
I don't have an agency, although I just applied to a bunch of PDs.
From what I can tell the standards are laughable and accessible to all but seriously mentally or physically disabled people, women tend to squeak by.
>>34750346
The qualifications really amount to a bare minimum. Don't forget that every house mouse and desk jockey has to pass them too, even if they push pencils instead of sector cars.
How would /k/ fight Rakka?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjQ2t_yNHQs
>>34773157
Damn that boy ugly 0.0
>>34773157
Napalm.
>>34773157
>they create metane in those towers
it would be a shame if something catch fire in there right ?
How can a plane be so perfect, /k/ ?
>>34745440
>Has never fixed an a fighter jet and is blinded by love
>>34745440
>only 25° AOA or it falls out of the sky
>>34745440
By completely ignoring every point of Sprey's retard manifesto
The US 3rd Armored Division arrived in Cologne that day. Two medium Sherman Tanks supported the infantry as they advanced toward the river and the cathedral. There was too much debris on the streets, so they stopped just a little ways from the cathedral.
The lead Sherman was hit by a German tank, destroying the Sherman and killing three of the crew of five. The GIs quickly learned that the enemy tank was a medium Panther tank, an older model with a command hatch above the gun turret that could easily destroy a Sherman tank.
The other Sherman realized it was no match for the Nazi tank and retreated. They called a nearby T26 (Pershing) for help and waited. The US T26 was an extraordinary tank, and very rare. It was the masterpiece of World War II tank development by the US.
That there was a T26 in Cologne, much less only a few streets over was an extraordinary piece of luck for the advancing Americans. The Pershing was much better than the Sherman and was pretty much an equal to any tank in the world.
>Strong M4
>Calling for help
For me it is T44 the best tank of the war
Looked it up on google, most of the threads from gun forums sound like mallninja circle jerks regarding this topic.
>stainless will glare and give away your position when operating stealthly within enemy territory only gays like flashy guns
>nitride is black and very cool you can drop criminals from dark I like black very cool
>>34745027
My understanding is that stainless alloys are usually heavier
>>34745027
Stainless tends to be less corrosion and wear resistant.
Some people like the aesthetic though.
>nitride
better corrosion and wear resistance than stainless (or chrome)
far higher rockwell
>stainless
usually cheaper
>Update: PLARF drill against a THAAD battery mockup on 7/29 involved 4 x DF-26C IRBMs, 10 x DF16A MRBMs, and 6 x CJ-10 LACMs. (20 total.)
As Sunzi writes, there's nothing an overwhelming ballistic missile salvo can't overcome. Very wow. Much ancient Chinese wisdom.
The NOTAMs of the drill.
>This is not about neutralizing one THAAD battery, this is about neutralizing the whole US base + 1 to 2 aircraft carriers coming to support.
>launching massed ballistic missiles of unknown composition against a nuclear armed adversary
>how to get radioactive command bunkers and smoldering fuel depots and power plants with one easy trick!
>>34744820
>hey ring rong
>lets launch multiple ballistic missiles at pig americans
what could go wrong ?
just to remind that chinese where but mad when usa were looking into sm-3 land attack version with reasoning that ballistic missiles from nuclear nations will be taken as nulear attack by default whatever warhead those missiles has
I've come to wonder, are all Mosins with bent bolt handles the product of inbred Bubbas and Fudds with no regard for the weapon? Or were some manufactured that way? Is it an inherently bad thing for the bolt handle to be bent?
original PUs had bent handles i think
>>34744751
It's just so the bolt handle will have enough clearance to work with a scope. Of all the bubba modifications to be offended by, this one is the most innocuous. I'm not 100% sure, but I believe the sniper mosins were manufactured that way.
>>34744751
Any one that isn't an authentic PU or something like an m27rv are bubba
Well /k/, my uncle was diagnosed with pancreatic and liver cancer on Monday. He passed away in my arms tonight. I just inherited all of his land, his jeep, and his guns. What I want to know is, how do y'all cope with the loss of your hunting and shooting buddy? I can't imagine not picking on each other over who killed the biggest deer, debating which caliber is best, telling fisherman tales, and all that. How do you deal with loss /k/? I had to call his hospice nurse, call 911, all of my family and his friends, and all of that. I'm gonna be uploading some pictures from a local museum that I went to because I showed him these neat guns earlier today.
>>34772761
>>34772766
Here's a better pic of that pepper box
>>34772761
Losing someone you care about fucking sucks. There's no way around that. Take some time to just grieve. Go out and honor his memory. Shoot those guns. Go fishing. Find a new buddy to bullshit and go to the range with. His memory lives on with you. This is what he would want.
Anyone still watching the tank Biathlon?
Russia's on. They're slower than their first tank that was cheating.
No, fag.
>>34772717
Is today still individual race or team relay?
>>34772717
How was their first tank cheating?
Hello /k
Op is looking at revolvers, specifically model 29 44 magnums and 357s, all 4 inch.
What does everyone think about these?
Which round is a better man stopper with better damage/cavitation?
>>34744655
If you find a 357 model 29 you best buy it. Considering they are all 44 you no guns peckerwood
>>34744886
Read again faggot.
I don't care who makes the 357, if I did, I would have specified. Im talking ANY 357
Im only wanting a m29 44 mag
Ffs youre the peckerwood trying to be retardedly specific
>>34744924
Then buy a cheapshit Brazilian 357 and stuff it in your mouth.