[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 4019. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: images.jpg (11KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
11KB, 300x168px
Who would win in an all out war? USA or China
>in reality, no spam nukes
>present day
153 posts and 12 images submitted.
>>
America has no single point of failure, infrastructurally speaking. You blow the three gorges dam and half of China drowns, the other half starves because all the rice is now ruined by the flooding.
>>
>>30007473
depends, if China was invading the US, the US would have an easy victory no doubt.
>>
>>30007473
China doesn't even have a single aircraft carrier, correct? The US can't be defeated by anyone, if it's war to the death as you say, and not a limited engagement.

File: hqdefault.jpg (30KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault.jpg
30KB, 480x360px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T42-FIphKM

Neat
39 posts and 9 images submitted.
>>
>>30007458
>Swecuck knowing how to operate an AR, down to forward assisting the bolt home
Well I never
>>
>cucked lands now knowing how to use firearms without owning them
we just need to do the liberator thing and air drop firearms to revolt against the moslem hordes
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwg6RTjCH7g

Also here's a whiny faggot that's scared of guns.

Warning: May make you upset.

File: KSUB2K40GLK22.jpg (28KB, 500x178px) Image search: [Google]
KSUB2K40GLK22.jpg
28KB, 500x178px
Thoughts on the kel tec sub 2000? I just got my PAL (Canadian gun licence) in the mail and im looking for a plinker/defense gun. I personally like it because it's one of the only rifles that uses pistol mags and can therefore legally hold ten rounds and mag capacity is important to me. If you have experience with them give me some input.
31 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
>>30007281
Manipulations are a pain in the ass
The charging handel is on the wrong place and hard as fuck. reloading on a short time is possible but difficult.
everything beside of this is good up to top
>>
File: cx9a.jpg_thumbnail1.jpg (10KB, 533x236px) Image search: [Google]
cx9a.jpg_thumbnail1.jpg
10KB, 533x236px
>>30007311
Ahh I could totally see how charging it would be a pain.

Anyone with opinions on the Beretta cx 9 storm?
>>
>>30007356
looks ugly as hell

Should I /k/?
17 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
>>30007272
Yes
>>
>>30007272
No

Those IO imports are junk.

If you have a lathe and a welder you can make one for cheap. Ezpz.

Go and buy the centerfiresystems parts kit and the millitarygunsupply parts kit. $270.

Then get a 16" 9mm barrel blank. $40.


Then weld in a denial bar, weld the reciever back together, drill out the firing pin, mill off the original sear, and install a striker system / hammer fcg
>>
>>30007320

But I have neither nor do I have the skills to use them....

File: 1413666150826.gif (1MB, 384x288px) Image search: [Google]
1413666150826.gif
1MB, 384x288px
>Funstore has * ammo on shelves.
>Does not have any in * for sale.
12 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>30007267
>Gun store only has fudd calibers
>>
>>30007267

u wot?
>>
>>30007267
>limited to one brick of .22 per person

File: bJnQMag[1].jpg (74KB, 960x646px) Image search: [Google]
bJnQMag[1].jpg
74KB, 960x646px
What animals would be most weaponizable?
131 posts and 40 images submitted.
>>
>>30007081
Humans
>>
>>30007081
>Inb4 ants
>>
File: nnXVSeP.webm (153KB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]
nnXVSeP.webm
153KB, 720x404px
Haven't you seen movies? Fucking dinosaurs bitch.

File: cutaway.jpg (81KB, 1728x675px) Image search: [Google]
cutaway.jpg
81KB, 1728x675px
What if you replaced the ICBMs with railgun turrets that extend out of the submarine while surfaced. You would make it so the Railgun module fits into the existing tubes.

They already have the SSGNs with a longer range but the railguns can do a lot more. A railgun sub could surface and engage almost any target within 200km. The rail guns can target aircraft, missiles, surface ships and ground targets. You could surface and fire at 24 different targets or saturate a single target with hundreds of rounds.

By having them on a nuclear sub most of the downsides are eliminated, barrel wear is reduced as it's spread over a 24 railguns, you don't have to worry about wasting fuel to power the railguns, railgun reliability isn't an issue, you can fire them for a while then submerge while the crew replaces barrels and restocks magazines. Due to the small size of railgun ammunition much more ammunition could be carried than a SSGN
63 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
This shitty navy threads all happen within sprees.
>>
Wtf?

A rail gun just fires a metal slug undergoing projectile motion. Firing it at something 200km away is pretty much just going to be the slug whacking it with whatever energy it has from its terminal velocity.
>>
File: Outer Haven.jpg (173KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]
Outer Haven.jpg
173KB, 1600x900px
>[LIQUID OCELOT INTENSIFIES]

File: HMS-Queen-Elizabeth-528700[1].jpg (43KB, 620x368px) Image search: [Google]
HMS-Queen-Elizabeth-528700[1].jpg
43KB, 620x368px
Lack of Catobar and nuclear power isn't even the problem.

QE has zero anti ship,air or subsurface weapons and only has a couple of CIWS to defend it.
Every other carrier out there, from Admiral Kuznetsov and Liaoning to Indias Vikrant and Italy's Cavour if met 1-1 would be able to chase of Queen Elizabeth.
> But anon, carriers travel in battle groups!
yes they do, but the Royal Navy has only 6 Daring Destroyers to escort the ill equipped carrier, of which only 3 have access to harpoons.
These harpoons were only added after the ship was complete as they were stripped from retiring type 22 frigates, which in itself is hilariously embarassing for the Royal Navy.
The Royal Navy's only anti ship weaponry comes in the form of the helicopters she will carry at launch and any astutes that get attached.

Good luck trying to show the flag to any of the countries that have now joined America in humiliating the once rulers of the waves.

Don't worry, I hear she has a cinema built in onboard, that'll keep the crew busy while they sit in ports.
45 posts and 9 images submitted.
>>
File: putin-medvedev-laughing[1].jpg (38KB, 798x500px) Image search: [Google]
putin-medvedev-laughing[1].jpg
38KB, 798x500px
>>30006864
> Largest ever Royal Navy warships unveiled to 'scare off Putin'
Lol
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516953/warships-unveiled-to-scare-off-Putin-hms-queen-elizabeth-prince-of-wales-carrier
>>
Honest no troll here

What worries me about England's new carrier is that it's so limited.

It's a port queen that's just there to remind the world that England STILL has a capable Navy

If England was smart and honest they wouldn't build this boat. They focus their money on top of the line defensive weapons.
England would have this insane air defense mega-project that was top of the line better than the Americans. It was limited sure,but it was a beast of a weapon and it made England pretty much impossible to invade.

But instead we get this "Carrier" that's going to help fight in NATO wars or anti-terrorism fights. Its not a blue water weapon,its a show of force and its anemic

The Royal Navy is dying
>>
>>30006893
>But instead we get this "Carrier"

Carriers, plural.

> Its not a blue water weapon,its a show of force and its anemic


You're just fucking trolling at this point.

File: image.jpg (248KB, 1001x1334px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
248KB, 1001x1334px
Hey /k/,

A few weeks ago I bought a couple of 1917 Enflieds on the cheap but they're both sporterized. Kinda new to the hasguns club, any tips on where/how to find original wood furniture? Thanks in advance.
11 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
pls
>>
File: M1917 (2).jpg (73KB, 1500x280px) Image search: [Google]
M1917 (2).jpg
73KB, 1500x280px
>>30006758
>>30006815
They are both Fucked beyond saving, Sad. You could take the one on the left to a gun smith so he can take that front sight off and you can sell it to someone who needs one. Enjoy them for what they are now. Hope you didnt pay much for both
>>
>>30006845
Paid a little less than $300 for the pair.

Maybe I'll just get an SKS.

File: 1463726124804.webm (3MB, 484x360px) Image search: [Google]
1463726124804.webm
3MB, 484x360px
Could the military really not find use for this tech?
This is decades old surely they could have something even better by now?
46 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
Putting a single vulnerable exposed defenceless soldier in full view of an enemy frontline?

Not much use.
>>
>>30006749
This plus satellite photography becoming a thing.
>>
>>30006747
These cunts were so fucking obnoxious

FUCK OFF LET ME SNEAK PAST IN PEACE

File: peaceful religious man.jpg (141KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]
peaceful religious man.jpg
141KB, 680x650px
Give me some good ones.
19 posts and 10 images submitted.
>>
File: 635989871428606901.jpg (304KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]
635989871428606901.jpg
304KB, 680x650px
>>
Crazy how all the innawoods threads start popping up again when summer hits.
>>
File: innawoods:practical.jpg (182KB, 680x650px) Image search: [Google]
innawoods:practical.jpg
182KB, 680x650px

File: WaltherP-38.jpg (155KB, 547x732px) Image search: [Google]
WaltherP-38.jpg
155KB, 547x732px
The stuff I've found indicates a bunch of contradicting conclusions. If interest I will bump with more pics
22 posts and 9 images submitted.
>>
Sure, where do you want me to take it? Olive Garden?
>>
File: image.jpg (51KB, 501x497px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
51KB, 501x497px
>>30006460
Clearer pic of slide plz
>>
File: walther_Closeup.jpg (152KB, 547x732px) Image search: [Google]
walther_Closeup.jpg
152KB, 547x732px
>>30006473
Applebees
>>30006476

File: owwie.jpg (167KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]
owwie.jpg
167KB, 1280x853px
Hey guise,

Whats the fastest ways to get a pistol as an immigrant in a country.

Lets start with UK, Japan, and China
17 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
>>30006110
Muhammad pls
>>
Attack a policeman who has a pistol and take it. Good luck, faggot!
>>
>>30006184

ukucks cops don't have guns though

File: galilace.jpg (36KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]
galilace.jpg
36KB, 800x533px
Why does /k/ hate this gun? Its honestly the one rifle I want bad enough to get rid of 2 or 3 rifles I have to have one. Everytime I see it mentioned I see responses like

>polymer shit
>IWI shill
>overpriced

I'm no good-goy and I hate the fucking kikery from here and Israel, but damn if the Galil and Tavor aren't nice. I have a Tavor and it's great (got it for a steal too). But I have a suspicion that the same people who cry about polymer have no problems with a SOCOMII or a fucking SCAR, which also makes use of polymer components. Who the fuck cries about polymer nowadays except fuds anyhow? Price is expensive as fuck though... I hope the get these out there in a few months, I really want a 308 version.
52 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
File: 1442638679343.jpg (18KB, 633x348px) Image search: [Google]
1442638679343.jpg
18KB, 633x348px
>>30005611
>what kind of sig do you want famm??
>the 550
>say no more
>>
File: 1448196853273.jpg (31KB, 650x532px) Image search: [Google]
1448196853273.jpg
31KB, 650x532px
>what kind of galil do you want famm?
>the arm or sar
>say no more

See a pattern?
>>
File: 1462773084587.jpg (574KB, 1000x650px) Image search: [Google]
1462773084587.jpg
574KB, 1000x650px
>>30005635
Saw one of these at a gun show not long ago and it felt badass when shouldering it, and seemed really light. I wouldn't mind having one, but not as much as a Galil or another AK.

File: R92-68011lg.jpg (17KB, 850x219px) Image search: [Google]
R92-68011lg.jpg
17KB, 850x219px
What does /k/ think about lever rifles?
11 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>30005556

they're cool, I prefer them to bolt actions
>>
They make great suppressor hosts.
>>
>>30005580
What are the best ones for the price?

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [4009] [4010] [4011] [4012] [4013] [4014] [4015] [4016] [4017] [4018] [4019] [4020] [4021] [4022] [4023] [4024] [4025] [4026] [4027] [4028] [4029] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.