Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 3154. page

Anonymous
2016-10-01 12:58:44 Post No.31520655
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: bd56ef80b34928c0106a586d28daffa7.jpg (35KB, 564x423px) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 12:58:44 Post No. 31520655 [Report] [View this topic]

So, I just picked up a wide handguard for my Cetme. It doesn't fit. It looks like the barrel thicker as the hand guard gets wedged on the barrel right behind the front sight post.

Can I get it to fit by removing a little material from the hand guard?

68 Posts / 24 Images View this topic

68 posts and 24 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 13:16:05 Post No.31520696
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 13:16:05 Post No.31520696 [Report]

File: 1474061646744.png (2MB, 1279x712px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1279x712px

>>31520655
pics? Put the handguard up to the underside and post pics of where it's not fitting.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 13:34:20 Post No.31520750
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 13:34:20 Post No.31520750 [Report]

>>31520655
How do you like your Cetme? Is it the 308 or 556 one?

Just started looking at them in 308, seem to be easier to find and cheaper than a FAL. Is your's century arms?

Anonymous 2016-10-01 13:40:30 Post No.31520772
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 13:40:30 Post No.31520772 [Report]

File: 1410586.jpg (35KB, 411x309px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 411x309px

>>31520750
Get a PTR, the welds on the Cetme are shitty. I didn't believe it until I compared the two at my local fun store. The PTR welds are much cleaner and the rear sight on the Cetme is cringe worthy.

Anonymous
2016-10-01 12:26:17 Post No.31520558
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 400px-MR-C1.jpg (13KB, 400x241px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 400x241px

Anonymous 2016-10-01 12:26:17 Post No. 31520558 [Report] [View this topic]

Could this stupid thing even work?

16 Posts / 4 Images View this topic

16 posts and 4 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 12:30:52 Post No.31520573
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 12:30:52 Post No.31520573 [Report]

Sure. Its basically a G11, but with the mag in a less shoot-your-fingers-off location. Even has the same cocking mechanism.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 12:48:02 Post No.31520624
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 12:48:02 Post No.31520624 [Report]

>>31520558
No, it only ever made it to the mock-up stage, no working prototypes.

Could it have worked in the future if it continued in development? Maybe, but probably not well enough to hit procurement, we still haven't overcome all of the problems with caseless ammo.

>>31520573
>basically a G11
Except it was never developed to a working state.
>less shoot-your-fingers-off
Especially since it couldn't shoot.
>has the same cocking mechanism.
Except it doesn't cock anything.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 12:55:03 Post No.31520644
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 12:55:03 Post No.31520644 [Report]

>>31520624
>Except it was never developed to a working state.
That doesn't prevent conclusions from being made based on what is known of what was intended. The Magpul PDW was only ever a piece of plastic, but we know that could have worked.

Anonymous
2016-10-01 11:18:23 Post No.31520433
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: Mini14GB.jpg (2MB, 2840x980px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2840x980px

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:18:23 Post No. 31520433 [Report] [View this topic]

Is there any reason to buy or use a mini-14 instead of an AR these days? Does the mini-14 even qualify as a 'weapon' in any real sense of the word?

19 Posts / 3 Images View this topic

19 posts and 3 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:24:54 Post No.31520444
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:24:54 Post No.31520444 [Report]

>Is there any reason to buy or use a mini-14 instead of an AR these days?
A-team fetish.
>Does the mini-14 even qualify as a 'weapon' in any real sense of the word?
Probably

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:34:17 Post No.31520465
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:34:17 Post No.31520465 [Report]

>>31520444
I dont get why people are obsessed with a 80s era cartoon

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:39:10 Post No.31520470
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:39:10 Post No.31520470 [Report]

File: 1475279672926.gif (2MB, 514x205px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 514x205px

>>31520465
>cartoon

Anonymous
2016-10-01 11:03:39 Post No.31520399
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 4RFewkz.jpg (3MB, 2500x1370px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2500x1370px

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:03:39 Post No. 31520399 [Report] [View this topic]

Post sexy revolvers ITT

I'll start with this amazing M1879 Reichsrevolver

15 Posts / 10 Images View this topic

15 posts and 10 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:05:57 Post No.31520402
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:05:57 Post No.31520402 [Report]

File: opulence.jpg (637KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 1600x1200px

>>31520399

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:07:10 Post No.31520406
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:07:10 Post No.31520406 [Report]

File: Unforgiven Sequoia.png (739KB, 850x1120px) Image search: [Google]

739KB, 850x1120px

>>31520402

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:08:18 Post No.31520408
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:08:18 Post No.31520408 [Report]

>>31520399
Just purchased a sexy SAA repro. Cannot fucking wait.

Anonymous
Quality sights for maverick 88 2016-10-01 10:39:57 Post No.31520359
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 20161001_063530.jpg (2MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x2340px

Quality sights for maverick 88 Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:39:57 Post No. 31520359 [Report] [View this topic]

Poorfag here, looking for some decent sights that won't break the bank. I already ordered a Hogue short stock for it. Spending limit is around $100.
Pic related. Its my scattergat.

38 Posts / 6 Images View this topic

38 posts and 6 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:44:44 Post No.31520371
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:44:44 Post No.31520371 [Report]

>>31520359
Doable, but that's gonna require some gunsmithing, how much are you comfortable doing?

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:49:49 Post No.31520383
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:49:49 Post No.31520383 [Report]

>>31520359
There's this
http://www.maverick88.com/shop/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=66
But it's out of stock and seems a bit shit, but dunno for sure.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:52:53 Post No.31520385
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:52:53 Post No.31520385 [Report]

>>31520371
Never really done much gunsmithing but I'm sure I can handle it with tutorials.

Anonymous
2016-10-01 10:18:06 Post No.31520291
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: CP0CwviWwAANZJC.jpg (27KB, 600x308px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x308px

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:18:06 Post No. 31520291 [Report] [View this topic]

So, Israel DLC is dropping soon.

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cILaMKFIg6s

How do you feel about the current balance of Wargame, particularly where verisimilitude is concerned?

With Jews you lose
With Finns you win
With Yugo you no-go
Maglav too OP

125 Posts / 18 Images View this topic

125 posts and 18 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:23:04 Post No.31520302
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:23:04 Post No.31520302 [Report]

Not sure if this thread really belongs on /k/. Regardless, I'm still trying to get a feel for which decks I work well with. I've been trying variations of Blue Dragon decks so far, and I've found their mech to be pretty good at most things. As for current balance overall, I don't have many grips other than the obviously broken naval system and how annoying aa choppers on both sides are.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:27:02 Post No.31520320
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:27:02 Post No.31520320 [Report]

File: 1475272905286.png (685KB, 539x720px) Image search: [Google]

685KB, 539x720px

>>31520302
/v/ is too toxic
/vg/ it dies
only /k/ gives a shit about this precisely enough for an occassional thread to be worthwhile
it's on topic so long as we sperg over the weapons innit

Blue Dragons is pretty underpowered right now. Never play naval, use SPAAGs.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:30:28 Post No.31520334
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:30:28 Post No.31520334 [Report]

>>31520291
Spikes and Lahats

that's literally it, Spikes and fucking Lahats

could be worse.

Anonymous
2016-10-01 08:30:45 Post No.31520001
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: _20161001_092910.jpg (176KB, 1080x1025px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1080x1025px

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:30:45 Post No. 31520001 [Report] [View this topic]

What are the plans for commercial aircraft in a WW3 scenario? Thousands of airworthy planes aren't just going to be grounded and left to rot, right?

18 Posts / 3 Images View this topic

18 posts and 3 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:32:01 Post No.31520009
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:32:01 Post No.31520009 [Report]

File: maxresdefault.jpg (33KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1280x720px

CRASHING THIS PLANE

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:34:01 Post No.31520014
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:34:01 Post No.31520014 [Report]

>>31520001
Fly them into sand ape cubes.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:36:51 Post No.31520027
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:36:51 Post No.31520027 [Report]

That's exactly what will happen, they will rot. Civilian Aircraft require extensive service, are expensive to operate, and have extremely little use in military application. Furthermore, most countries worth a damn have their own military transports for these kinds of things. If the civilian airports are shut down due to war, so will commercial aircraft.

Completely different is ships, every cruise ship, tanker, or cargo ship can be drafted for service and utilized for various military applications. It's just not that way with commercial aircraft.

Anonymous
2016-10-01 08:10:03 Post No.31519904
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 20161001_094800.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:10:03 Post No. 31519904 [Report] [View this topic]

Sup /k/
German /k/amerad here. Recently I acquired an old scope but didn't have any mounts. So since I have neither machining skills nor access to a mill, lathe or at least a drill I decided to click together something in the CAD software at university and print it out.

This first iteration is to find out if the PLS material will withstand 8mm Mauser recoil and if the parts measurements are at least remotely accurate. So far I am satisfied with some minor exceptions.

Two major weaknesses exist: the riser is too large. This is due to my decision to not include settings for elevation and windage, which is the second weakness. The idea was that if the mount fails under recoil with the riser just being a massive part it will also fail if the riser has moving parts for windage and elevation. Also I had no time left, hence just extrudes two rectangles without paying much attention to measurements.

Tomorrow I will give it a try at the range.

Feedback and suggestions for improvements are more than welcome. Especially easy ways to measure slopes and circles

Also diy gun improvements/parts thread

38 Posts / 10 Images View this topic

38 posts and 10 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:11:19 Post No.31519908
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:11:19 Post No.31519908 [Report]

>>31519904
fun project but can't you buy rings?

what company is the scope and what size?

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:11:28 Post No.31519910
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:11:28 Post No.31519910 [Report]

File: 20161001_094814.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:12:25 Post No.31519914
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:12:25 Post No.31519914 [Report]

That looks really, really gay.

Anonymous
2016-10-01 08:05:19 Post No.31519878
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1277067057317.jpg (296KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1600x1200px

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:05:19 Post No. 31519878 [Report] [View this topic]

sup?

93 Posts / 14 Images View this topic

93 posts and 14 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:06:17 Post No.31519883
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:06:17 Post No.31519883 [Report]

Too small.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:07:16 Post No.31519890
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:07:16 Post No.31519890 [Report]

>>31519878
Get that gyno checked out.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:08:10 Post No.31519896
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:08:10 Post No.31519896 [Report]

>>31519878
>old as fuck post
>no simettamp
You tried.

Anonymous
2016-10-01 07:56:42 Post No.31519839
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 14523184_1149355231814148_2178998559836155698_n.jpg (29KB, 480x409px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 480x409px

Anonymous 2016-10-01 07:56:42 Post No. 31519839 [Report] [View this topic]

What weapons should I own to protect my property and family when my land is invaded in year 2 of Queen Hillary's reign?

30 Posts / 2 Images View this topic

30 posts and 2 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 07:58:16 Post No.31519843
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 07:58:16 Post No.31519843 [Report]

>>31519839
You're too late. That ship sailed.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 07:59:50 Post No.31519847
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 07:59:50 Post No.31519847 [Report]

Vaseline

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:00:02 Post No.31519851
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 08:00:02 Post No.31519851 [Report]

Semi auto rifle in 7.62x51 real fucking NATO.

Install cameras outside your front door. When the entry team comes and stacks up, fire through the wall at chest level and fuck them up.

Anonymous
VSS Vintorez introduced to Russian civilian market 2016-10-01 06:32:03 Post No.31519421
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: Vss_vintorez_01.jpeg.jpg (144KB, 1920x658px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1920x658px

VSS Vintorez introduced to Russian civilian market Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:32:03 Post No. 31519421 [Report] [View this topic]

Soon in eastern european countries. Calibers 7.62x39 and .366TKM, Manufacturer Molot Arms

How jealous does this make the Americans or Canadians?

82 Posts / 20 Images View this topic

82 posts and 20 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:35:14 Post No.31519439
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:35:14 Post No.31519439 [Report]

If Veprs are making it here I believe these will make it here as well. Look at that stock, it's obviously for hunting... chechens

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:38:12 Post No.31519457
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:38:12 Post No.31519457 [Report]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mz2_8ZJWjo
Neat specs

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:38:14 Post No.31519459
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:38:14 Post No.31519459 [Report]

File: 1408110713950.jpg (307KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 1920x1080px

Very.

Do only the Russians make these?

Did the Ukies or the Pols ever produce any?

If so that would mean there is hope they will make it over somehow.

Anonymous
LRSO Is Under Fire, What Could Replace It? 2016-10-01 06:19:06 Post No.31519332
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: iu.jpg (24KB, 600x326px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x326px

LRSO Is Under Fire, What Could Replace It? Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:19:06 Post No. 31519332 [Report] [View this topic]

So Hillary Clinton has told donors that she opposes the LRSO, which would replace the current nuclear cruise, the ALCM. This would leave us without a nuclear cruise missile. How could the US Air Force deal with this major capability gap?

The B-21 Raider is meant to carry the LRSO, which the Air Force is insistent is necessary for the B-21 to threaten every inch of the globe through the 2050s or more. Does the Air Force push for the rumored 2037 Heavy Bomber to be hypersonic?

Not having a nuclear cruise missile is a big deal. That would limit the B-21 Raider to dropping conventional nuclear weapons. It is also not clear if Clinton opposes the entire LRSO program, which will produce a vitally needed conventional cruise missile too, or just the nuclear warhead armed cruise missiles.

I am very opposed to cancelling the LRSO. The US decreased its strategic arsenal in the 90s in the hope that Russia would follow suit and it has done the opposite. China is also without a doubt developing similar capabilities.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/clinton-privately-opposed-nuclear-upgrade/

30 Posts / 4 Images View this topic

30 posts and 4 images submitted.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:29:48 Post No.31519411
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:29:48 Post No.31519411 [Report]

>>31519332
i'm not unconvinced hillary isn't secretly funded by the chinese.

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:33:50 Post No.31519431
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-01 06:33:50 Post No.31519431 [Report]

File: Desire_to_know_morale_patch.png (98KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 500x500px

>>31519411

Pretty sure she got donations from party connected businessmen by way of the clinton foundation.... soooo.. that's not inaccurate.

>>31519332
honestly, not sure what the ultimate implication of this becomes especially considering the modernization of various arsenals around the world and the aging arsenal in the us....

PAGING OPPENHEIMER! ....I kinda want to know his opinion on this one.