He doesn't own a lever action for dinosaurs
>He doesn't know how to greentext
Im prepared dont worry.
.308 > .45-70
Post aircraft that are doing something.
>No stationary ground shots.
>No flying in straight lines.
Lets make this thread like a Michael Bay movie.
I know that you should be secretive about firearms ownership, but at what point have you completly revealed your powerlevel?
>be hasguns
>at work
>talking about orlando shooting with boss
>my boss says there should have been an assault weapons ban
>Tommy_lee_jones_reading_newspaper.jpg
>tell my boss that I have the same rife orlando shooter used (thought it was an AR at the time, not the sig sauer mcx(
>tell him i use my rifle to shoot paper and steel with like the millions of people who own those rifles
>'but it's an assault rifle"
>no its not, I have never assaulted any body with it and don't plan to. Orlando shooter was hell bent on killing on those people, he would have done it with a musket if he had to
>boss tells me there should be a background check
>tell him there is one but he got delayed on the nics and the ffl had no reason to not sell it to him
>next day I bring in a 4473 and let my boss read it
>>31625746
Keep it vague, but make sure they know you completely dominate them in firepower and could kill everyone in the building if you wish.
>>31625746
I wouldn't get in a political argument about guns with a guy who can fire me at-will, personally
save that for the proletarian revolution comrade
>>31625746
when i do, i dont tell them how many guns i own. I usually say 4-5 depending on the person. But im the guy who makes a debate out of someones off hand remark about gun control or a salt rifles.
>http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2016/10/indo-russian-fifth-generation-fighter-r.html
>The negotiations for the Research and Development design contract with Russia for the Indian "perspective multi-role fighter", a variant of the Russian single-seat FGFA called Sukhoi T-50 or PAK-FA has been resolved, Indian Air Force (IAF) chief Air Chief Marshal Arup Raha said.
>“The tortuous negotiations holding up the Indo-Russian Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) have been resolved,” Raha was quoted as saying by Business Standard Wednesday.
>Earlier reports had said New Delhi had proposed that instead of commencing the detailed project report (DPR), India would pay for three prototypes and transfer of technology (TOT) instead of US$6 billion for the DPR and joint production.
>“The two sides are believed to have agreed on a $4-billion “R&D Contract” that could see HAL and Sukhoi co-develop and build up to 250 FGFAs for the IAF,” he added. “[Earlier, the IAF] found gaps in information on transfer of technology; how they (Sukhoi) have achieved these 5th generation technologies, and in visibility of the total cost. So these issues were flagged… and now a lot of clarity has come on these issues.,” Raha said.
PakFA almost confirmed for India, straight from their Air Chief, not some 'unnamed source' or other BS from Janes or Sputnik. Contract will be signed either 2016 Q4 or 2017 Q1. At least 3 Prototypes will be delivered.
Rafale and PakFA will make up the bulk of their airforce until at least 2040. Maybe another single-engine Light Weight Fighter, either Tejas, Gripen, or F-16.
>>31625587
Doesn't matter.
Russia can't afford to finish it with the economic size of Spain.
>>31625587
>part of the program since the start
>they're STILL 'considering' picking it up
Says a lot that they haven't put in these orders yet and are still getting massive concessions from the Russians due to the quality of the airframe
>>31625837
PakFA isn't finished yet.
You can't order something that is still in prototype phase, that is asking for trouble. See: F-35.
>are still getting massive concessions from the Russians due to the quality of the airframe
Concession is due to temporary devaluation of ruble, and Indian preference for ToT over joint-production. New deal suggests they will buy more off-the-shelf and get more ToT instead. IAF has more strategic freedom than nearly any other air-force. They can buy from anyone, yet they chose PakFA, obviously it has lot of potential.
Just curious?
both pistol and rifle.
and for giggle how much ammo does one carry for patrol?
>>31625356
about treefiddy
>>31625356
However much it take to level a village.
>>31625356
7 magazines for an M4. Pistols are rarely used but 3 mags if issued.
>>31625360
Epic meme bro. Not really go fuck off to 9gag, faggot.
first line edition. belt rigs and shit.
>>31625175
Happy Monday, fellas
>>31625175
>that mag load
I see what you did there
looking for a sling
cant decide over THE MAMBA or something along the lines. dont necessarily want a 3 point sling but needs to be somewhat "tacticool" that wont get all tied up with my kit and the vehicle, being relatively easy to transition walking around in kit all day to slinging without kit on
any suggestions?
/k/ In am in an intense argument with some a leppo about nuclear energy and development. If WW2 never would have happened, would we still have nuclear technology as it is today or not? Key points:
Germany, America, and Japan all had nuclear research Divisions.
Nuclear Fission was theorized in 1938
Nuclear Fission Theory was refined to a practical level in 1939
The soviets developed a bomb in 4 years
Also Nuke Thread
The biggest argument is that nuclear technology was only developed because of the Manhattan project.
>>31624992
I would expect that without the huge cash injection that was the Manhattan Project nuclear power is delayed by about 20 years.
If there's no Cold War and fear of nuclear weapons i would expect nuclear to have replaced a large chunk of coal on a health basis by now and with the threat of climate change I would expect nuclear to continue making inroads.
>>31624992
> posting this hippie bullshit in /k/
May the ghost of Edward Teller rape you for eternity in hell.
What should the Germans have created to fight the T-34? Obviously the Panzer III and IV were too lightly armored, and while the Tiger had a big gun (for you), it wasn't efficient and often broke down. What could they have made that would be efficient, easy to manufacture, and well equipped like the T-34?
>>31624501
A T-34
Maybe add some improvements to the optics/crew comfort
>>31624501
Probably something like a late panzer iv with the long 75mm, but with more armour. Or a smaller panther without the autistic reliability issues. Take your pick.
>>31624501
A reliable Panther. The tank would have been great had it not broken down at every single point possible.
What do you use to kill this fucker?
Modern "horror" is so fucking bad. Do you millennials honestly like this garbage?
At best this trash is jump scares.
>>31624298
immigrate to europe and open a kebab restaurant
>>31624298
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/09/us-navy-ship-uss-mason-targeted-in-failed-missile-attack-from-yemen.html
Shitty missiles or badass EW? you be the judge.
Probably a RPG or something. Doubt it was an anti-ship missile.
>>31623983
>A destroyer having any reason to be within range of an RPG
>mfw when Praying Mantis II
And why is it the Benelli M4 Tacticool?
Seriously, what else holds a candle to this thing that a civilian can get their hands on?
It's the best period. Even considering options not available in America it's still better.
The biggest con is the 922r shit/price.
Sega 12
>>31623834
It is a bit pricey, though what sort of shit can you put on this thing not made in the US? It's damn near perfect straight out of the box. Though, I have seen LE variants in cases that are only to be sold to the police, makes me wonder what the difference between them is.
And the Indians are back in search of a new fighter to replace the bulk of their MiG-21s. To be precise a single engine fighter with production to take place in India.
Saab and Lockheed Martin are all over it, who will take it between the Gripen and F-16?
To sum things up for those confused with the recent purchase of 36 Rafales
>India puts out the Medium multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MRCA) tender out in 2011 for 126 aircraft with 74 options.
>MiG-35, F-16, F-18, Typhoon, Gripen and Rafale compete
>Only Typhoon and Rafale make the specification criteria and subsequent down select, Rafale wins in 2012
>Negotiations drag for on years with Dassault with the Indians asking for production in India, okay, transfer of technology, okay, and Dassault to be responsible for HAL making the planes, Dassault goes fuck off
>Eventually India needing planes bad just goes for a foreign sale of COTS planes of 36 planes from France, which costs more per plane
>Still needing to replace the bulk of MiG-21s, Saab and LM vulture over India ready to throw production lines and ToT for the contract
The bulk of the Indian air force is to provided by hundreds of 'heavy' Su-30s, and they've upgraded the MiG-29s and Mirage-2000s left in service. Also, the Russians managed to renegotiate for the Indians to buy 100 PAKFAs under the FGFA program finally.
That leaves hundreds of MiG-21s, MiG-27s and Jaguars needing replacing that the 36 Rafales can't cover, dictating a new cheaper fighter purchase along with the indigenous Tejas.
www.thehindu.com/news/national/finally-search-begins-for-a-fighter-to-replace-mig21s/article9202548.ece
http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/iaf-kicks-off-contest-to-make-single-engine-fighters-116100800638_1.html
The Gripen E/F would be best for India, unless Lockheed can deliver a serious cost reduction via a bulk order.
>>31622602
F16s are already way cheaper than a Gripen.
>>31622602
Possible, though the F-16 may have the advantage in that the Indians may want to take the lowest-risk option possible right now after all the shit that's happened. The Gripen E doesn't have any history behind it. I don't really expect it to have a problematic development, but the Indians may be wary.
This would require them to learn from their mistakes though, which may be asking a little much.
Posting tasteful pictures
>>31622435
Taste of iron, brother
>>31622435
anyone an ass man?
>yes, I'm trying to shit up your thread
>>31622435
Poop in your mouth edition
Old>>31619841
>>31622319
>>31622319
In for anon totally copied my gun
>>31622259
Together we shall rule /arg/
Or something. Maybe we can just vote or something
Okay, how the hell do people STILL prefer 9 over 5.7?
I'm not even gonna touch .45.
But there is no reason to own a 9 handgun over a Five seveN, except for personal preference in terms of ergonomics or something.
>>31622134
price and selection (or rather lack of) of civilian market ammo.
also, there are a tremendous amount of both pistols and rifles in 9mm. how many are in 5.7?
>10mm
Poor bait