is there any kind of folding knife that is gold standard for self defense and just to keep in your backpack. help would be excellent as i've got no idea where to start. i'm guessing i need folding because it's easier to conceal. but i'm not sure about brands etc. in return if you have any med questions, ask away, med fag here.
>and just to keep in your backpack
If you consider a folder here, then you shouldn't be left alone with sharp objects.
>>31729190
>folding knife
>self-defense
slash your wrists with it, autist.
>>31729190
Spyderco waved Civilian.
Done.
Find a flaw, /k/.
Their satallite phones failed during Operation Red Wings. Also it's apparently a really grueling place to work.
>>31729353
how so? just the pace?
>>31729177
I cant own anything they make as a civilian.
Would love to have a couple javelins around. No more worries about tanks or helicopters.
How would you organise battlemechs /k/?
What do you mean?
"Organize" as in chain of command?
>>31729151
Descending order based on autism level.
>>31729151
if we are talking about the strategy board game I never played, I cant really answer.
But id choose one fast lightly armed scout, one heavy armored SOB to tank enemy fire and another big mech, this one lightly armored but carrying the heavy guns to deal the damage, and would. any additional mech would be a tank or a big gun, depending on how many are available to play, and considering MW2 the only game I played, id use the line astern formation, with scout far ahead , tank in second and guns last
You're spending some quality alone time with you're nugget at a nice lake when suddenly these fuckers come up.
What do?
Get into a real boating accident and drop the nugget into the lake
rape them
what do those nets even do besides lower visibility
>yfw you realized the ATF is on our side and bans stupid shit like can cannons on purpose to make it look like they're actually doing something
2/10
>>31729032
Get outta here, ATF
>>31729032
You seem to be under the impression that it's the ATF's job to restrict our access to guns as much as possible.
They may believe it is, but their actual job is to enforce existing laws, and nothing else.
Name our band, /k/.
Daykare
>>31729017
Why are the Irish Army Rangers the best SpecOps?
Just fucking look at them.
>>31729017
>>31729017
>Cheeki and the Breekis
>The Rolling Smoke
>Rush B
>The Rainbow 6 (looking for new member)
There's more for sure.
I'm getting out of the military and need to send my shit home for a bit before I can move it out of state. My question is, is it legal to transport non Cali legal funs through Cali to Oregon? Or will I be a winner of a waterboarding vacation at Guantanamo bay as soon as I land?
>>31728926
Make them featureless and you might be ok.
>>31728928
Knights armament is banned by name along with my RPK and golani
>>31728935
there is a federal safe passage law, if your starting and ending destinations have the guns you own as being legal, you can transport them through less friendly states without issue
The Zastava M88.
Is it a great gun or it sucky?
>>31728884
just like most pistols it has its faults and its merits.
ive always wanted two so i can pretend im in a chinese action movie.
>>31728900
So it's gud then?
My buddy has one, it's not very reliable but it's built decently.
I'm willing to bet that if he gave it anything more powerful than a target load, it'd cycle fine.
Though I don't think there's any reason to buying one over a Makarov aside from pure aesthetics; especially since they weigh less and 9x18 isn't too expensive.
Not to mention the Baikals in 380.
Is it good?
>>31728846
.454 Casull
10mm
44 mag
>>31728846
Yes.
>Inb4 glass-wrists get here
It's been proven time and time again that the main handgun calibers have very little difference in terms of practical performance and what really makes the difference is shot placement.
Get to the range and practice.
>*yawn* Daddy, it's 3am. Why are you firing Mosins at the rats again? This is why mommy left us before I was born.
>>31728750
>mommy left us
>before I was born
holy fuck are you some sort of teleporter
>>31728758
>My wife's child.
>>31728750
>firing entire mosins
because daddy built this mosin catapult so he could do nothing but fire his mosins at rats. Be a good little androgynous child and go get us more moonshine.
Daddy gave me 500 dollars on my 21st birthday and I already spent 30% of it on booze, food, and a few books.
Should I invest the rest of it in a good gun?
If so, I was thinking about buying a handgun. What are some reliable handguns for 300?
I got u senpai
Sure I'll take the bait.
No.
>>31728541
Smith and Wesson SDVE9 or TP9SF
There is nothing else of value in that price range so dont ask.
Why are fal's so expensive. I would've figured with over 2million produced from 1954 to now, it would be the same as any semi auto mil-surp rifle. Maybe I'm just bitching because I'm poor as shit
complex machining to finish receiver
>>31728456
The law man does want anyone to have fun. That is why they are so expensive.
Machined receiver and import faggotry.
If you look at a PTR91, it's a stamped receiver which is made domestically and thus cuts out a lot of middlemen and expense when it comes to getting you a battle rifle.
Then there's all the cheap-ass aluminum mags that litter the world.
I know Coonan machines some FAL receivers for people, but not on any large scale, and not complete rifles.
SO our glorious leader Ian McCollum stated, during his review and breakdown of a British EM-2 rifle (link below) that in his opinion, the .280 British was a better cartridge than the .308, and its evident in us drifting back in that direction via the Remington 6.8 and what I can only assume would also be ammo like 6mm PPC and Norma. The idea being, I would assume, shorter fatter cartridges, with inherently better burn patterns/rates, also, allowing for a longer/heavier projectile, while still maintaining a relatively small size, and weight.
Leading me to questions which would be,
A. If they really are better, why are these ammo styles forsaken by the manufacturing community, and still generally considered a meme ammo?
B. If they aren't better, what makes the .308 superior then?
C. If the .308 really is better, how could Ian be wrong, I mean it's Ian for christ's sake. Also, what is it that makes Ian believe it is a better cartridge, and why?
If any of the assumptions I've made are incorrect, please correct me, I'm sure /k/ will proceed to tear my metaphorical asshole assunder.
Pic for reference, ammo as follows: 4.32x45mm US Experimental, 5.56x38mm FABRL, 6.35x48mm Winchester pre-SAW Ballistic Test, .280/30 British Type C, 6mm SAW, 7mm High Velocity, 7.62x51mm NATO, and that funky weird shit on the end is 5.2x68mm Mondragon.
Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wdhN5_RpX4
Bludgeon me with information, oh glorious hive-mind.
The .280 didn't catch on because the Americans were insisting on a .30 caliber cartridge. Not too different than the .276 Pedersen.
>>31728406
legitimately ashamed i wrote so much for such a simple answer.
So, whats with the 5.56 then? Why not use something with more punch, did we have some obsession with a .22 caliber projectile too?
>>31728452
If the US had not gone down the 7.62x51mm rout it would have been at a severe disadvantage in small arms for most of the cold war.
.280 British is boring and really not that good as a military round in the modern context.
Im quite saddened to hear that the Gunny passed today. can we get an appreciation thread going? :'(
>pretending that Gunny died
WHAT IS YOUR MAJOR MALFUNCTION NUMBNUTS?
good thing he's never gonna die
He kissed a dude...
The mouse face is gone from the Mi-28NM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cazyAj4V21I
This is why you have to stop bully other wise poor hilcopters get surgery D:
>>31728277
>>31728283
Did the Japanese or Iranians buy it or something that they gave it a nose job just out of reflex?
>>31728316
This anon is well acquainted with his cultural stereotypes.