Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 3008. page

>>31743954
How big are your mom's tits?

>>31744038
Yeh figured I should've waited for night /k/

>>31744051
I am a member of night /k/.

You're question is stupid. So I'm toying with you. At best this is qtddtot.

Also, how big are your mom's tits?

File: IMG_20160922_155323262.jpg (3MB, 2432x4320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2432x4320px

>>31743840
I have a Del-Ton as well, but with an Anderson lower. Cheapie special, but it works fantastically and fits nice and solid.

>>31743868
Mine is an Anderson lower too. We are one and the same, friend.

File: IMG_20160922_133529608.jpg (2MB, 2432x4320px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2432x4320px

>>31743879
Nice. I've gotten shit so far for only having a buis on mine rather than a carry handle, but the sight is nice, and I do plan on getting an optic at some point..so I didn't want extra parts when the intention is to remove it anyway.

That's life when you have a lot of bills: one project at a time.

most people agree its a pretty decent gun, and they're finally in stock so you aren't paying 800 bucks for them.

get one that takes glock mags in 9mm

>>31743791
>What do you guys think of the sub2k?
It's fucking awesome
>Would it be good for home defense or to keep in your car?
Yes.
>Are carbines with the magwell in the pistol grip stupid?
No, it's comfy
>Would it be better in 9mm or .40?
9mm, specifically the Glock 19 compatible model. You can use 33rd happy sticks and Glock 19 or 17 mags.

Yep, you're done kiddo. They'll crash into your living room in a few seconds. No survivors.

Where do you live? I'm in Charlottesville, VA and I see Osprey's like every other week.

Always surprised by how big those fucking things are

>>31743548

This machine kills mehreens

>>31743339
Large steel plates at 90 degree angles.

>>31743339
PVC works.
Steel is recommendable as long as you can angle it right, but PVC works just fine.

File: IMG_6116.png (969KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

969KB, 750x1334px

I made one very similar to this. The legs were closer together. Worked well until my buddy missed a couple of times and ripped a leg apart.

File: 20161020_125757.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

Image of the reticle. The pointers are closer together than the x39 reticles that I've seen.

File: 20160915_115857.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

The scope shows up during online searches but the reticle doesn't match anything I've found

>>31743136
Thats the 400m simonov reticle, designed for 7,62x39 rifles. Also your scope is not calibrated for 7,62x54r, it has 1/2mil clicks at least on elevation.

File: 1472522674528.jpg (672KB, 1333x2000px) Image search: [Google]

672KB, 1333x2000px

Bump

Did you hammer the bolt itself open? That may have damaged the locking lugs. Honestly, hard to say without seeing pictures.

>>31743100
My locking lugs look good. I've examined them already months ago. When I use brass or good quality steel case she goes like a champ.

>>31743021
Don´t buy Cro-Shit.
Get a compact USP variant or something

>>31743021
garbage. get a glock or an m+p

FNX 45
USP

>>31742930
if you want the feel of an m1 carbine but want the best bang for your buck just get a chiappa citadel
>not paying out the ass for a real m1 carbine
>not paying out the ass for .30

>>31742951
Yea, no. I don't want the .22. I can reload .30, I'm not really worried about price of the rounds as they are fairly cheap around me anyways and there is always online.

So not one of you guys on here owns this rifle to make any recommendations for me?

From what I can tell all the repros are pretty shitty. Auto-Ordanance, and Inland are the main repros it seems, and so far the reviews aren't that great. The Chiappa M1-9 is also an option, but it's also terrible.

File: typical_k.jpg (59KB, 640x436px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 640x436px

>gun owner while still a minor
>no 4473

pretty good, actually

>>31742899
A bubba Arisaka with no bolt is not worth $90. Maybe, just maybe, it would be worth it if the bore was immaculate, the bluing was pristine, and the mum was intact.

File: image.jpg (54KB, 624x409px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 624x409px

>>31743236
Dont care. Its a good rifle, and I like it.
Bought that thing 6 years ago and I see arisakas for 270+ in the local shops. 90$ is chump change, especially in the gun world. Sadly the chrisanthemum is damaged. Fuckin gooks.

File: Royal Navy 2020.jpg (329KB, 1600x980px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1600x980px

>>31742867
The Royal Navy has two roles, firstly to facilitate the projection of UK power to anywhere on earth. Secondly to guard GUIK from Russian submarines. The second role has taken a back seat since the cold war.

The UK has no interest in making a fleet to fight other surface fleets, because the only other blue water navy in the world is on our side.

>>31742867
You ever wonder why the russian navy has so many ocean going tugs? and why thier ships are stuck in port even once the ice thaws.
> Not considered a blue water navy.
> Crap training

British navy is not even a shadow of its former self.
https://soundcloud.com/war_college/what-the-hell-happened-to

Not being able to eclipse decrepit Kuznetsov with a carrier of their own must be embarrassing, but more importantly they wouldn't be able to provide a carrier with an air group and escort order even if they had one.
UK has no cruisers. Russia has 4 of them, carrying ridiculous amount of long-range firepower.
UK has 13 frigates but their purpose is anti-sub warfare whereas the Russians are focused on surface engagements.
Russians have 12 blue water corvettes with cruise missiles capability and can easily overwhelm Type45's with saturation attack.
Russians have more attack submarines and modern Yasen/Akula 2/3 are roughly on par with Astute class.

If these two navies were to engage each other in the middle of the Atlantic right now, Russia is very likely to come on top.
Should it come to defending Britsh Isles, the Royal navy is likely to pull it out. Not without heavy losses and through the help of RAF.
The Royal navy attacking Russia in its home waters is suicidal to say the least. The Russians have a retarded number of stand-off defenses and cruise missiles able to target each British ship with 50 to 1.

All of this being purely theoretical since UK is part of NATO and would never go into war alone.

>dont buy unreliable piece of shit
>buy used glock

r u memin me sun

File: IMAG0752.jpg (757KB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

757KB, 3264x1836px

Realistically, people like to save money. Myself included. Any day I would rather but any Glock over $2000 dollar 1911. That being said, I also buy budget guns that I know perform well. Like my ATI 1911. For me it's balance of value, quality and price. I just don't think that paying for a gun that I could 3 or 4 guns for the same price is a good idea, especially if the only benefits are finish and smoothness.

However that being said there are garbage guns that are cheap and a lot of people buy. The fact is that a new shooter doesn't really know what to buy, and will probably get something cheap to try and get into shooting. Realistically, however, of the person refuses to listen to others and still buys the garbage, he/she probably won't really get into shooting.

>>31743025
Sorry for my shit grammar, my phone skipped some words and corrected others

>>31742761
>melty melty

why would you want one

Google is your friend

>>31742801
They're aesthetic as fuck and I've wanted a G36C for as long as I've known about them.

>>31742745
I only own a Colt Hunstman that I inherited from my WWII veteran grandfather.

>>31742745
I've signed that I am a /k/ubist on many government forms that ask for religion

>>31742745
Forgive me Kube for I have sinned, I have not fired any of my firearms since may,