Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 2747. page

>>32043067
because Ivan of better at computer cyber attack

>>32043067
Because they're poor

File: 1368936087782.jpg (597KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 1920x1200px

>>32043067
>have shit tones of T-80 and T-72
>entire country collapses
>have no money to buy or develop newer tanks
Gee I wonder why.

>>32039893
Magdump into chest (heart lungs). If you only carry +1 magazies inna woods that's your own damn fault.

No. 44mag, 10meme, 45-70, 12g slugs

>>32039893
My mom's friend knows him.

>>32037753
Time stamp first

>>32036601
>Walther

Out of those three?
Hk
Sig
Glock

HK is top. Sig is probably #2, but when they have problems, the guns totally fail. When Glocks have problems, you just get a sprinkler pattern ejection of brass. A problematic Glock doesn't fall into pieces while you are shooting it.

Why the fuck is anyone buying those ancient 70s airplanes when the F35 sales are just around the corner.

>>32034767
So are these upgraded airframes or does Boeing have the capabilities to produce new ones?

>>32034815
iirc the gulf countries aren't being offered the F-35. The only country in the region offered F-35 sales is Israel for beyond obvious reasons.

>>32033232
Peace.

>>32033232
Counter insurgency.

Armenian genocide was successful. Nobody did anything about it and there's no Armenian state today.

We literally haven't lost ground troops to enemy air forces since the 1950s. If things are that bad our response is most likely going to be strategic nuclear rather than battalion level.

US doctrine is to establish immediate air superiority even before ground troops go in, so the chances of them being accosted by enemy air support is almost nil

We don't need AA when we have air dominance.
Oops, scratch that, "air supremacy".
Uh, did I say "supremacy"? I meant "superiority".

Why would you make a navy that's as big as the rest of the word's combined fleets even bigger? Just a waste of money

>>32023718
Current fleet size is completely inadequate. The ships we have are being pushed too hard. No other nation has the number of maritime commitments the US has.

That said you don't need 350 (I think the report Trump is using as the basis for this plan put required ship numbers in the 320-340 range), but it's not an obscenely large amount either, considering.

Trump will no doubt seek aggressive cost reduction in naval procurement, which is currently a fucking disaster

>>32047676
Gay bar.

>>32047686
but how do you keep them from leaving or reproducing amongst themselves?

>>32047676
It's called /b/

>>32047665

If I was you I would shoot myself

>>32047701
All my guns are ones I inherited from my grandfather

>>32047665
A semi auto rifle in 308 or less

>>32047519
>Is it a bad idea to cast some janky ass shit into something I want to rotate at high speeds with stability

Just buy lead. Better yet, just buy bullets. Casting isn't as simple as
>Pour into mold
>receive desired result

>>32047530
well, i'm aware that you need to remove impurities, and you need to lubricate the bullets, but my question mainly lies with the idea that fishing weights may be too soft for bullets. thoughts?

File: 1350647646078.png (8KB, 493x402px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 493x402px

>>32047530
>"I'm interested in learning things!"
>"You're stupid. Stop trying to learn things!"

>>32047344
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jif4Wo0LDX8

Could throw a gat trigger on it, a shitty way to do it but it works

>>32047344
Yes, but if your robot can be activated with a single button press then you're back to square one.

Maybe let the robot take any number of button presses with any timing, then queue them up and read them in at a rate that matches the gun's ROF. Then you're still doing one round per trigger pull

File: US_soldiers_with_captured_German_Kar98k_G41_StG44.jpg (226KB, 998x1442px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 998x1442px

>>32047257
>Did the technology required to manufacture assault rifles exist during WW2?

No.

>>32047257
refer to the guide mate, its the sticky

The technology to create Assault Rifles existed since WWI, if not before. The reason why they weren't widely adopted is because of doctrine that demanded long range precision from every rifleman. Once Germany finally realized that Fritz and Jerry don't really shoot past 300 yards all that often the Assault Rifle was born. The Soviets caught on to this rather quickly while NATO (read: 'Murrika) thought that intermediate cartridges were fake and gay, which is why they didn't adopt them for another generation.

there's also the chance of you having a blood clot in your system that you dont know about, and the force of the recoil could dislodge it and immediately kill you

guess you shouldn't get a gun bro

also marines are retarded

>>32047218
Revolvers are great in their own right, but a semi-auto pistol is superior in most regards, especially for new shooters. Just get something decent and take care of it and you will likely never have a moment of trouble. And by decent I don't mean expensive. I mean a good gun.

Good luck.

>>32047218
You sound like a retard and retards shouldn't own guns

>>32047057
Replace all your beer with Smirnoff Ice.

File: notsure.gif (3MB, 432x227px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 432x227px

>>32047066

File: image.jpg (286KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1000x1000px

>>32047057