>Japanese "destroyers"
>>32060408
Well, her task is to destroy submarines using her ASW helicopters
Hence, "Destroyers"
>>32060891
So then why don't other countries use this idea? Japan seems to be the only country that has "helicopter destroyer" as a distinct class of ship.
>>32060408
>>32061022
Oh boy, it's another "let's argue about exactly what a ship is called" thread
Do the Russians really have the most advanced tanks now?
Is the US really 30 years behind?
>>32058616
The only time the US was not 30 years behind is the 90s.
Why do so many assault rifles have the charging handle on the right, when a right handed shooter can cock the gun quicker with a left hand? I mean, Germans got it right with MP-40/StG-44 already!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=FM0yuZrNOm0
In some guns it's slightly less work to manufacture - mill the ejection port and charging handle at the same time. Other guns it's to keep the moving handle away from your face. In the AK ... I actually don't know, I'm guessing to keep the handle away from face since it wouldn't be any more difficult to stamp the receiver with a cutout on the left side for the handle and put the dustcover/selector on the left too
>>32058428
Mall ninjas and shot timers didn't exist in the 50s. It just wasn't considered at the time.
>>32058459
The bolt handle rides above the receiver on AKs, all that would need to change is the dust cover which is even easier.
Questions That Don't Deserve their own thread
Found out that my grandfather may have left behind an SKS in Argentina when he passed away.
Is there any legal way to take it from Argentina to America? Currently living in America
>>32051252
Unfortunately, I don't think so.
Anyone have a good long eye relief optic recommendation for a Moist Nugget?
>>32051252
Not without a fuck ton of import/export bullshit. I'm not saying you should smuggle it in but it would likely be easier than trying to import it. But you will get caught and ass fucked in federal prison.
>>32051275
NONE. STOP ASKING
Just bought a c9. Bully me.
>>32043746
You're gay
>>32043746
Anybody got that pic of the 1911 that was photoshopped to look like a hipoint?
>>32043746
It's a decent pistol for the money, just a bit of an uggo.
/k/ I am looking for a good solid EDC folding knife. Birthday is coming up and looking t get myself something nice.
What are your recommendations? Needs to be stainless steel, about 3-4'' blade. High quality. Cheaper the better. But interested in all recommendations.
>>32055234
I currently carry a Kershaw Skyline
>>32055234
Thoughts on this knife
I'm a fan of CRKT knives. I have an older model of this:
https://www.crkt.com/m16-01kz-spear-point-black.html
You can get them on amazon for cheaper and I like the assist.
So /k/,
What is the reason that you never served?
>>32054167
Scoliosis. They wouldn't take me.
>>32054167
Every male in my family has served for as long as records go.
I'm the first one not to do so because I wanted to become a scientist.
6 strokes, scoliosis, heart problems
Hay /k/ I'm innawoods right now posting on mobile, I have reason to believe someone has been poaching on my land but now absolute proof, I'm wondering if you have any advice on finding said proofs
>>32051583
Deer cameras and shit. Put decoy cameras in obvious spots with a camera watching them well hidden.
Hide in a bush until he happens to stroll by. When this happens, shoot him.
This could take weeks, mind you. Be prepared.
I many to say no absolute proof, fucking auto fill. I don't hunt what sort of places would a poacher set up?
Anyone else here really like the PDW concept? Sure its a bit obsolescent, but they're cool.
>>32049658
They aren't obsolete. There just isn't a round in existence that is best for this role.
Bottle neck pistol cartridges like 5.7x28 are a start but they are not good enough.
R&D for making new ammo and weapons is expensive but that is nothing compared to the risk of being a failure on the open market.
The criteria for a good PDW round would be.
>2000-3000 fps MV at 16" or less
>55-100gr bullets
>G7 type bullets
>Any caliber theoretically, but...
>...high sectional density for penetrating armor
>Total cartridge length possibly 2" or under
>Standard capacity magazines 15-30 rounds
The PDW concept is interesting however with advancements in service rifles especially in the US they become semi-irrelevant.
A p90 is about 5.7 pounds
while a loaded M4 comes in at about 7.5 pounds.
So instead of saving 1.8 pounds
You don't sacrifice combat efficacy
You don't need to procure expensive proprietary guns and ammunition
You don't need to add another layer of training to use the PDW's
You don't further complicate your logistics.
Make sense?
>>32050178
The whole point is size and portability. Vehicle crews, pilots etc etc. It's definitely a niche role, and not a very important one worth pouring millions into.
Bottom line, we're not likely to see any great strides in this area anytime soon.
>bongland police L I T E R A L L Y can't even afford proper 5.11 Tactical combat pants
Lol. Just fucking lol. :^)
How pathetic can a modern military force get?
on what fucking planet is pink camo actually practical. really that's a serious question which one?
>>32057143
A pink planet. Duh.
>>32057143
Breast cancer awareness to appease the grils.
Where were you for the past decade?
does anyone know what this means?
>>32065853
OP is a fag
>>32065870
fpbp
>>32065870
fuckin hell ive asked 2 other boards and they all reply with this
So what so special about this ammo?
absolutely nothing.
they're black talons that aren't black.
>>32065007
Nothing, it's just +P+. You can order it online for less.
>>32065007
It has "Law Enforcement" on the box.
Quick, I need every post, image and more about how a revolution in the USA would end with the govt. getting BTFO'd.
>>32064725
Bump.
>>32064725
Should have just made a bait thread.
>SHALL NOT BE-
>droned
>>32064725
>browning automatic rifle was obsolete by ww2
>mg34 was superior to it in every aspect
>lol 20 round magazine
>no belt fed action
>slow rate of fire because MUH ACCURACY in a fucking suppression weapon
why was the inter-war US military so hesitant to adopt new belt fed designs?
>>32064639
Same reason it didn't adopt a better cartridge
Already had shitloads of it, may as well put it to use
>>32064639
Because US infantry doctrine was based around individual marksmanship.
>>32064639
because you wont stop touching yourself
seriously, why dont we have bigger bayonets for modern rifles?
please make this a reality. how do i do this?
can i do this in real life?
Don't need the length anymore. A six inch blade on a 20 inch barrel is already going to be hard to maneuver in a house where you may actually need it. Actually even without the blade a full length rifle is cumbersome, hence shorter carbines