Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 272. page

You can anticipate a shot
The whole "be surprised by it" is how you break your arm on high recoiling guns

Don't flinch
Relax
Don't hold your breath fully inhaled when you shoot
Exhale half of it then hold

>>34890602
I'm not huge on recommending little girl 22lr guns for first time owners but 7.62x54r is a bit much, man

>>34890602
You picked one hell of a rifle to start off with. You're probably flinching in anticipation. The only way to get over it is to shoot more and build up your shoulder. Also do strength exercises to be able to hold up control your rifle better. Arms outstretched hold your rifle parallel to the ground for a minute, rest, another minute, rest, minute, keep going until you cant do it anymore. Then add 15 sec to your next set and do this process as part of your daily routine from now on. Also pushups, pullups, forearms, and all that jazz.

That's not a 226 though

File: 1502453983167.jpg (1MB, 900x3327px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 900x3327px

>>34890544
You had one job OP

Cool 226 lool

File: U3vgQ3D-2-660x458.jpg (74KB, 660x458px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 660x458px

Nice 4 cell russian,still in use.

File: russian-troops-ground-crimea.jpg (135KB, 1200x914px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1200x914px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpCQYn7hfoc

No I already shot my loadout onto your moms face.

File: Instasize_0817124645.jpg (2MB, 1512x1512px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1512x1512px

>>34890329
Top zozzle

What gun is that guy holding?

>>34889606
dont go cheaper than aero, PSA, etc. you shouldnt be spending all that much more than $50 on a lower parts kit, match triggers are $100-$300 and stock from $50-$200

>>34889617
Stocks don't really affect the performance of the gun at all so i'd suggest the cheapest option available.

Alg defense milspec trigger is like 50$ if you want a good but cheaper trigger above average milspec. Besides that you can get most of the lower parts including average trigger for 50-70$ from dpms i think, i forget but i saw it at a local academy sports. I think an average basic stock is good from about 50-70 as well, doesn't really matter what you get if you like it and the buffer tube isn't fucked up which i think isn't too common for what you'd find. I got a utg A2 stock and it works just fine despite what people might say. Sites like Joeboboutfitters and Palmetto state armory are your friend.

>>34888675

Hold on, let me just go to Excite and enter "classified missile stuff" and when I get there I'll download "Top Secret missile specs" and then i'll put it in my server.
>searching
>searching
>searching
>seeking
Weird, I can't find it.

>>34888704
Lol use Altavista, they can search more sites.

Mossberg MvP

>>34888545
But, next time, use the QTDDTOT

>>34888486
Watch sales. We're coming into hunting season with goose and waterfowl ready to start, plus a lot of bow seasons will be starting in october so hunting rifles will be getting pushed.

Are you looking for a combo rifle scope or just a rifle?

the war ended before the mk.viii could see battle, there was no money or effort for tank development between the wars, the m6 was a piece of shit, the sherman was among the best medium tanks when it debuted, they had to ship tanks to europe and the pacific, the war ended before heavy tanks designed to counter the king tiger could be fielded, the m103 was a piece of shit that was rectified by the marines, then the heavy tank was obsolete because of the mbt

>>34888475
'Cause there was no need for them. A M26 was more expensive than a M4 for roughly the same combat capabilities.

>>34888475
A war in which transporting Heavy vehicles across the Atlantic is more expensive than they're worth.

>>34888360
>hasn't really translated into better prices for the average customer
They might be trying to pay off their new laser cutting machine and will lower prices when they've done that.

>>34888369
If it works and people are buying it, why the fuck would they lower the prices? the way i see it, if it really is worse and if they get their way pushing this trend, manufacturers would only be cutting down costs while keeping the same profit

>>34888377
If someone else realizes they have a laser cutter and buys their own laser cutter and accepts paying it off over a longer time period, they can offer a substitute product at a lower price.

>>34888253
I just find it so funny that Multicam, originally supposed to be the "jack of all trades" camo, ended up splintering into countless variations for specific areas. Self defeating marketing much?

>>34888465
Pieces of different variants look okay together though. New looks okay with faded. Try that with other patterns and all the kids will point and laugh.

>>34888465
Never should have gotten rid of woodland and choco chip. Worked 1000 times better

>>34888097
Sure, lets go to Europe and shop around for one. They have like 5 "frigate" variants over there.

Why not buy Chinese?

The put weapons inside containers so they can change weapons anywhere that has a port.

>>34888097

You are literally describing the SSC version of the Freedom class, so I'm not sure what the fuck your point is.

Freedom class has AESA radar and SeaRAM now. SSC adds baby-Aegis and could add as much as a 32 cell VLS if they use the whole mission module, though at that point a person would be free to question why you don't just use a Burke.

Because the US government was riddled with the communists that Joe McCarthy tried and failed to get rid of. They made sure that the military never ended up being able to fight a left-wing enemy (Korea and Vietnam) with the force it brought to bear on right-wing enemies (Germany and Japan). The plan worked, and the military ended up being hamstrung, which made the war drag on until the population got tired of losing sons and having no gains to show for it, and demanded an end to the war.

>>34887993
>Joseph McCarthy was a good guy
>We lost because of the hidden communist conspiracy

I should have specified I was looking for real-life answers not conspiracy theorist delusions.

>>34888013
>I should have specified I was looking for real-life answers not conspiracy theorist delusions.
That's not an argument.

But this is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wljpYZ8wejA

The people who complain about that also say the Iraq war was an indictment of the T-72

File: DEjf5QyXoAMandn.jpg (53KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1200x675px

What happens when the missiles run dry on both sides, ECM and hard kills being largely effective?

Does it reach a point where defenses are sufficient for combatants to close to gun range?

Do we need, dare I say it, big gun cruisers? Or...battleships?

>>34887735

If not that battle then look at the Falklands War in which the Argentine Navy got shut down due to fear of submarine attacks and the Royal Navy got hit by air attacks.

>>34888055
If I recall, Egyptian Russian ships emptied their missiles and has no guns so the Israelis were able to close in and fire their guns on them.

That's why newer Soviet fast attack crafts has a big gun.