>Russia's Ministry of Defense (MoD) is planning to bring back into service some of its mothballed T-80BV main battle tanks (MBTs) and to update them, according to a source in the country's defence industry.
>The upgraded T-80BV MBTs will feature the Sosna-U fire-control system also used by the T-72B3 and T-90, an updated energy generator and engine starter, and advanced explosive reactive armour (ERA) plates. The modified T-80BV tanks will be suitable for the climatic conditions of the Arctic, the Far East, and Siberia, the source said.
>A programme to upgrade about 3,000 T-80 MBTs dates back to 2002; however, it was not implemented.
http://www.janes.com/article/65580/russia-may-upgrade-and-return-t-80bv-tanks-to-service
Why does Russia need so many tanks? Are they planning on invading hell?
>>32093864
This does not seem very plausible. I think they're even trying to phase out the few hundred T-80Us which are more capable then BVs, simply to move away from the T-80 chassis. The T-72B3M is a much more cost effective upgrade that has better automotive qualities and is sufficient for killing Polish Leopard 2A4s or any Ukrainian crap.
If true however, that means their Armata system is a few years late in development.
>>32094285
T-72B3 still have the same 40 year old armor with Relikt on top, giving T-80's the same upgrades will result in a better tank and give them a larger fleet of competetive vehicles.
>>32094339
You have to wait 8 years before saying it have the same 40 year old armor.
The very same thing can be said about the T-80BV or not since there are T-80B's that were upgraded to the T-80BV so you only have to wait 2 years before you could say that some T-80BV are infact using the 40 year old base armor.
Pic related, an ongoing thing of mine.
>>32087931
Is this a sign? I was legitimately looking into buying a galil parts kit today. But im not sure i should rn.
>>32088075
It's expensive, but there's no better AK made.
I'm doing a S. African R-series build, hence the stock, larger front sight ring, pistol grip.
Lacking some other SA parts, but will get them at some point.
>>32088327
What the fuck is that magazine
Seriously.
>>32091924
So go find one and suck his cock. Was this really thread worthy?
>>32091924
>Estonians can't have a flag with subdued colors because it would look like 50% of the world's flags
So much for originality
>>32091943
What's wrong with blue, black and white? Those are fine colors.
hey /k/ which camo should i invest in polish wz.93 or flecktarn?
>>32087928
flecktarn
>>32087956
forgot to mention I live on the us east coast
>>32087992
upstate sc to be exact
What effect would bombs with yields comparable to thermonuclear bombs with no harmful/long-lasting radioactive fallout do to MAD doctrine?
Nothing. Dumb people may treat radiation like black magic but it's the least of a nuke's primary effects.
Honestly it would be worth living in Tokyo-3 just for the chance to get in positions like that with Misato.
>>32087866
I would rather slowly burn to death that die from radiation poisoning and thermal injury is one of the few types of pain the the brain can do little to nothing to turn off.
Healthcare anon here with clinical time in a level 1 Burn ICU. I won't say which but it won't take long to look up the Burn formula named after it.
Is DayZ the most innawoods game out there?
>can make primitive bow/arrows and spear
>can make hide clothes out of durr and pig skins
>weapons need to be cleaned
>must manually reload mags and weapons
>must manually cycle bolt and pump action weapons
>can hide in the woods and chill out
>military gear for the motivationally-inclined
And as of 0.61 Experimental
>hostile wolves
>zombies that aren't entirely broken
Post DayZ stories from modern to days long by.
>>32087726
>>>/v/
here you go, friendo
>>32087726
Clunky shitty vaporware that the "creator" used to steal your shekels so he could climb Everest.
It's a mod of a game that was made nearly ten years ago AND IT ISN'T FUCKING DONE
Fuck.
>>32087754
You are a cunt.
Also, The Long Dark is pretty fucking cool.
Does /k/ actually bother zeroing their pistols?
>>32090943
Yes, I own a universal sight tool and prefer adjustable target sights.
But I shoot pistols at 100-200yds so I need my guns dead on.
>>32090943
same reason you polish your shoes mate.
don't want to give someone a dirty face.
>>32090968
What kind of universal sight tool? I recently got an MGW Sight Pro to zero some of my guns.
What would /k/ during wartimes be like? I can imagine it being a lot of /k/ members shit talking other companies or divisions.
It'd be a bunch of sissy faggots who like to big talk online but as soon a a bullet whizzes past them their macho mall ninja bullshit goes out the window and they curl up and shit themselves. I'd love to see a battle between /k/ommandos and actual tough people.
I'd probably be fucking around with night vision all night long.
You ever play the battlefield bad company games? It'd be like that. A bunch of fuckups fucking around.
Though I'd like to think in the event of a civil war with this california shit, a lot of /k/ would enlist just to remove commie
What's the coolest CCW I could buy for under $1,000?
>>32087647
hi power
swag is for boys, class is for men.
>>32087647
A P7M13
oh under $1000
This depends on what flavor of cool you're going for.
big swinging dick who's kicking ass and taking names, dripping masculinity, alpha male-tier cool? that's going to be a fucking Series 70 colt 1911, a ghost 92FS, MAYBE a really slick CZ 75 but it'd have to be an Omega Convertible or a Shadow Tac II but I don't think you can even get those for under $1,000. it's going to be a classic full size, that's for sure. desu maybe even a fucking delta 1911 for that 10mm.
james bond, understated, calm and collected-tier cool? It's obviously going to be a PPK/S. They're just too slick. I don't know any smaller gun that looks as sweet as a PPK/S.
Never forget that you're supposed to be the prize. Don't let THINGS define you. You're the cake everyone wants a piece of, not some slick gun you carry or nice watch you wear. Don't forget that. Too many weak guys thinking they need some shit to define them instead of working on themselves.
So what the fuck is the difference between a P320 compact, and the carry?
>>32087534
P320s are all essential the same. It's a modular pistol. Kits aren't too expensive and allows you to swap barrels, grips, triggers, etc. Great if you're, for some reason, only allowed one registered gun.
>>32087534
Fuck dont quote me
But I think the Carry has the full sized grip with the Compact length barrel
>>32087534
The height of the grip.
tfw you will never carry your M70B into battle for glorious Serbia in the Bosnian war.
>>32087259
Didnt a literal crap ton of Serbs, you know, die?
>>32087259
dying with cause is better than dying without one
>>32087259
>Glorious Serbia
Got ass kicked but every little slav neighbour
For the British MIV program, looks like the government is debating between a sole source government to government contract for the Boxer or an open tender.
From what I gather MIV is basically a program to replace the FV432 series with an 8x8 platform in APC, C&C, ambulance, repair and recovery variants.
What should they do?
Likely contenders if they go for a competition.
ARTEC (Rheinmetall/KMW) - Boxer
General Dynamics - no confirmation, but could be the LAV 6.0/Piranha 5/Stryker/LAV 700 (Piranha was the incumbent winner of the prior effort before negotiations fell through)
Nexter - VBCI 2
Patria/LM - AMV
ST Kinetics - Terrex 3
http://www.defensenews.com/articles/boxer-spars-with-rivals-over-miv-requirement
Neat little presentation by GDLS on their options.
http://www.generaldynamics.uk.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/GDUK-MIV-1.pdf
No love.
>>32086976
Didn't the Brits help develop the VBCI 2?
I bet they go for that
How exactly do you beat a Roman Legion in the field? I ask because, according to their written histories, the Romans not only seem to lose battles alarmingly often, but often with the total annihilation of an entire legion or more. This despite an often considerable technology gap between the Romans and their enemies, their foes in the East not withstanding.
The pattern is this
1. The Romans encounter a new enemy. That enemy slaughters them on an epic scale
2. A new commander arrives and institutes some new tactics or employs new equipment
3. The Romans win in a subsequent battle, this time lopsidedly slaughtering the enemy on a massive scale
I don't know if this just a characteristic of ancient historians who felt the need to embellish to make the wars they were writing about to make them seem more epic, but it is curious.
Oh, and Rome thread general
>>32088489
When in doubt zergrush the fuck out of them. The Romans can not have a proper shield wall when there are lots of bodies piled on top of them.
The M1 Garand is a jam-o-matic piece of trash. Why didn't the US just stick with the bolt action rifles like all the other countries in WW2 did. Are burgers really this stupid.
>"American weapons in WWII were stupid"
>>32086910
>Picture of an M1 Carbine
>Talking about M1 Garand
Try harder, britbong.
>>32086925
You clearly have no clue what you're talking about, false pic or not, the garand is still shit-town USA
I'm going to Make a mixture of water hemlock,rat poison and kerosene and dip them in it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z6x-Xpw_Vs [Remove]
>>32086440
Fuck off.
>>32086440
ricin
>>32086440