Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 2705. page

>last ever /arg/

Get fucked anon scum

>>32098778
First for last

>>32098801
Are you hitting the drinks for the last night we'll be together?

>>32098292
Pretty much the gun the Glock should have been.

>>32098292
They are garbage. The most hilarious train wreck in decades of a launch and relaunch.

>>32098292
Just get an original Remington 51.

>>32097995
>>>/adv/

Riding a motorcycle has been the most life altering experience for me, as long as your okay with risk and getting out of your comfort zone a bit.

>>32097995

>Nigger can't greentext.

Lol.

>>32097945
You never listen to k. Which means you should listen. That means you shouldn't listen.

>>32097945
WASRs aren't worth 500 nor are they worth 600. They are trash.

>>32097945
Don't worry, some other shitty AK will come to fill the gap. When the wasr first came people talked so much shit about them, before them it was other Romy kit builds.

Hell yeah. Not bad price. I absolutely love my SBL. The 45-70 is an awesome round, I suggest you get HSM cowboy ammo to build up a stock of Starline brass to reload with. You might not like the buckhorn sights that the GBL comes with, but there's tons of aftermarket sights that work awesome (like Skinner sights)

>>32097642
Sorry OP, im only going to derail slightly.
I really want to get a lever action, since I haven't had one since I was a kid. Any suggestions on caliber/model? I was thinking 45-70 or .444 marlin, but im not too picky. I'd like to get rifle for under $1000 and not pay out the nose for ammo.

>>32097779
I have a couple friends that swear by the 30-30
A bunch of my dad's friends say that it was the first gun they learned to shoot on

File: 1153811971350.jpg (244KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 640x480px

I would say it takes more skill to cut up vegetables with an AR-15 than it does a knife.

>>32096639
Wow.

>>32096639
Barrel, buttstock, bolt...rails?

File: U7AkN.jpg (614KB, 1840x3264px) Image search: [Google]

614KB, 1840x3264px

lol no

>>32096613
won't work as snapcaps with the primer hole empty, they are probably just a freebie meant to be keychains.

File: DSC09487.jpg (29KB, 560x433px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 560x433px

>>32096640
I should rephrase, not SnapCaps™, but rather dummy/practice rounds.

Lots of the non SnapCap™ practice rounds, do not include a primer to strike on.

>>32096243
AR-15 of your choice.

M16A4

>>32096489
Add a free float and a telescoping stock and your spot on.

>the sky is blue

>>32095971
wtf, I want my glock at a discount, some faggot police who has nothing to do than harass civilians by writing tickets doesn't deserve it.

File: Glock Blue Label.jpg (235KB, 1201x970px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1201x970px

For $398 you are able to buy a gun from an authorized blue label dealer. At that price, you get a Gen 4 with an extra magazine. The program is open to those who meet one of the following categories.

Sworn Law Enforcement officers, including Federal, State, County & City also includes retired L.E. officers with "retired" credentials (LE Department Picture ID front & back)

EMT's, Fire Fighters, Volunteer Fire Fighters, and Paramedics (with Picture ID from department front & back) Certifications alone are not authorized and do not qualify

Military personnel including Reservists and National Guard with I.D also includes retired Military with "retired" credentials (Military picture ID front & back) DD214/discharge papers do not qualify - If you cannot submit your ID please use our dealer locator to find a dealer in your area

Corrections Officers, including Parole and Probation Officers (LE Department Picture ID front & back)

State Licensed Security Companies (Loomis, RAM, etc.) Also includes State Licensed Armed Security Officers Employed by State Licensed Security Companies (with Employment Picture ID from company front & back) Certifications alone are not authorized and do not qualify

Court Judges, District Attorneys and Deputy District Attorneys

LE Academy Cadets with enrollment documentation from the Academy

GSSF Coupon Recipients should contact GSSF for more information

>>32094990
I went into the Army in 1980. I left in 1988. I was never issued anything other than the standard 1-quart, plastic canteen, not even for Grenada. I saw a few of those 2-quart canteens, but never cared enough to inquire about them. If we needed more water, we carried 2 canteens.

>>32094990
There were two types. The first type was a plastic sheeting, clear plastic bladder canteen type.

The second type is the pic you posted anon.

>>32094990
>2 quart canteen, best canteen. most premium, high fives.

just git one, and quit cryin'

How does a person like this even become an NCO in an American infantry regiment, let alone a senior NCO. I mean I've met plenty who are terrible people, and dickbags, but I don't think I've ever met any that have the wrong personality, character, mindset and temperament to be a good soldier. This guy seemed to be lacking all of that. How did he ever make it beyond private?

File: image.jpg (41KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x375px

>>32094566
Apparently it was a retroactive promotion for time served while being a POW.

>I'd like to go AWOL for a few years and get promoted...

>>32094566
>implying incompetence prohibits one from thriving in the US Army

>>32091876
Is it possible to blind someone with non-visible lasers? That might actually be useful.

>>32091876
>laser
>with a beam
Does he even into lasers? All that wasted power, diffraction is a cruel mistress

File: IMG_4583.jpg (63KB, 750x477px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 750x477px

How can 9mm even compete?

>>32091706
Corvettes are better

Frigates are smaller and cheaper than destroyers and have much less missiles
They exists to escort carriers after the navy runs low on money from building carriers.
Destroyers are all around vessels that carry a good amount of missiles and can do anything
Cruisers were meant to carry a shit ton of missiles and do everything else a destroyer does

Cruisers and frigates are being phased out because they don't serve a role that destroyers can't do just as well. We've never needed more missiles than a destroyer can carry.

Used to be that they would have different anti-sub capabilities but then they were all refitted with tow behind sonar systems.

File: 1031350541.jpg (147KB, 1000x541px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1000x541px

>>32091706

>Is there still any difference in the roles of Cruisers, Destroyers, and Frigates nowadays?

>Cruisers

Nowadays, the term "Cruiser" is rarely used except when talking about abnormally large surface combatants like the Kirov battlecruisers. The Ticonderoga-class cruisers were planned as a class of destroyer, but were re-designated as cruisers purely for political reasons. In terms of function, they are essentially identical to the Arleigh Burkes class destroyers, except that they hold more missiles and have large command facilities.

Frigates are smaller warships design to supplement destroyers/cruiser in particular roles. Whereas larger warships are general-purpose vessels usually, Frigates tended to be more heavily optimized towards a particular task. This is a natural result of having a smaller vessel with less room to carry extra equipment. For example, the Oliver Perry Hazard frigate-class was created specifically to act as escorts for auxiliary vessels. In particular, their design was optimized towards anti-submarine warfare because the Soviet fleet was very submarine-focused and so auxiliary ships would need to be protected during a war.

However, for some navies, "frigate" is actually their largest surface combatant, and in those cases, the Frigates tended to look a lot like scaled down multi-purpose destroyers rather than specialized vessels. Sad but true.

File: is3.jpg (389KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 1280x960px

>>32089429
This mothahumpa was introduced a few weeks after Hitler An Hero'd.

>>32089429
I'm still amazed they managed to lose 1 of those for 40 years. How the fuck do you lose 1 of 2 prototypes?

>>32090334
Forget that it was a prototype.

How the fuck do you lose a super heavy tank that never left the country in the first place?

>>32088402

These*

>>32088402
I tried out the amend 2 mag that came with a lower receiver I purchased. It works. Not sure what else to say about it. I like my lancers and pmags better, but the amend 2 worked fine.

>>32088402

I had the Series 1 for a while and it hasn't worn out but i've seen that some people have had problems with them. Then again they're made of plastic i don't think they're meant for things like mag dumping.