Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 235. page

>>34940537
infantry support vehicle doesnt exist
and a tank is something that can hold liquid

>>34940537
Comes down to the role I suppose.
A tank would be I'll suited for blowing a room in a house to smithereens without taking a large part of the house with it. An IFV can do that but can't match some of the threats a tank is built for

A CV90 is an IFV.

>>34940457
The gun I want doesn't exist either.
I'm designing it right now.

>357 suc

You can end your search right there. It dosent exsist unless its a glock

>>34940457

isn't there an fnp in 40 that you can drop a 357 sig barrel into?

File: Vector Cannon.jpg (25KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 640x640px

>>34940426
>HAND OF JEHUTY
did they finally up and make ZoE canon to MGS again after they said MGS:PoOps is non-canon as-is?

Jesus christ MGS turned to trash after 3. In 2005 a bipedal tank with a railgun on it that could be taken out with a couple of Stinger missiles was the apex of warfightin' technology, but then all of a sudden Kojima gets his hands on the franchise and people are running around with robot arms in 1969 and the level of technology is literally higher than in their actual dedicated sci-fi high speed mech franchise.

also reported for /v/ shit

File: nofunallowed.jpg (84KB, 488x516px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 488x516px

>>34940463

An additional allude to video games is not a violation of the rules. Half this board would be out by similar logic.

Announcing that one has reported a post however is against the global rules.

>>34940254
that written knowledge comes from people who invented it, geniuses are the ones who come up with that stuff in the first place.

Genghis Khan's success was pretty simple

>1. he was really pissed off at a lot of people, for some pretty good reasons
eg. Mongols killing his father, selling him into Chink slavery, foreigners killing his friends, etc.

>2. he was practical
eg. promoting based on ability in a time when that wasn't common, choosing Turkic as the language of the army instead of Mongolian, recruiting from the people he conquered, adopting customs from the cultures he conquered

The second is what gave him success, the first is what drove him.

Hannibal, I think he took a lot from that second point too. Plus, war was the family business for him.

Join the army when you're eight. If you're not dead by the time you're 20, you might be a decent leader.

Not much, as long as the gas port is .062 and you at least have an h-buffer.
You might experience more parts wear.

>>34940237
It's not horrible. But it is overgassed

It's alright, but a bayonet won't fit right and it will look weird. Carbine gas in general is a bit tough on the action

>>34940228
>is this the equivalent or a 22lr?

Idk, but this is the equivalent of blatant stupidity, blank guns barrels aren't rated anywhere near the pressure developed during the firing of modern ammunition, be it a crudely fitted buckshot.

> Source

I tried.

>>34940241
>> Source
>I tried.
you didnt try hard enough, apparently

>americans in charge of engineering

>>34940228
A single buckshot pellet?
No that is in no way comparable to a .22lr.
The single pellet is not big enough to engage the rifling, helping it stabilize after it leaves the barrel.
Plus depending on the barrel size most of the gas will vent around the pellet, decreasing it's velocity.
The only way I can see this killing, let alone injuring someone, is if you shot them point blank.

File: 1382814464635.gif (2MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x225px

>That pic

kek

USN BTFO

Probably a management/training/culture problem in the 7th fleet brought to light by the extremely busy waters around east Asia.

>>34940101
Laughed so hard vomit came out

Cheers

Do it. At that price they're a phenomenal rifle. Easy change barrels for cheap that are stupidly accurate. A small thing that could be wrong but fixable are the hand guard not being square to the upper receiver. At $1400 I'd say only if you want, but at $800 you're getting a great deal, even if used.

>>34940057
Yeah that's what I figured, they retail for like $1600 so $800 seems like a steal for a rifle that seemingly has never been fired. Thanks!

>>34940108
no quite that high, but even if you were to just turn around and dump it on arms list for 1100 its a no brainer.