What do you think about gun owners with glasses? Would you trust one? Does it even matter? My eyesight is shit without my glasses but I feel unsafe without in certain neighborhoods I have to go down for work. I swear in the span of 5 years my vision has decreased rapidly though so I can't just freeball anything anymore.
I think that they are worthless sub-human pieces of garbage for not having perfect senses. They should most definitely not be able to exercise constitutional rights or defend themselves.
>>32666205
>According to the Vision Council of America, approximately 75% of adults use some sort of vision correction.
Of course /k/ is in the 25% master race and will look down upon you.
what the fuck are you even talking about
thats like asking if someone is uncomfortable with people wearing shoes
Why can't our special soldiers have a similar suit like this?
>>32666064
/pol/ Nice try though.
>>32666090
I am not saying it needs a Swastika, but power armour like this, it's 2017!
>>32666064
In what way would that enhance a soldier current capability?
>https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2622179/spanish-cops-seize-9million-illegal-weapons-terror-attack-fears/
Jesus Christ.
Look at all those rare guns which will go straight into the shredder.
>>32666044
>all those thompsons
OMG SEND THEM HERE, HAVE YOU NO DECENCY
>>32666044
Clearly the federal government should not have their hands on guns
Meanwhile...in New York City.
OC thread
>post no matter how shit your skills are
>>32665977
You should at least get GIMP if you're going to try and photoshop something.
>>32665977
Hi guys, I've some small arms designs and a lot of concepts including tactical thingys,
a little ergonomic and functional improvements of something and, of cource, as yet just original idea's for all this.
Never mind amout my enlglish, I'm foreigner.
Also, my reason have grand possibilities for a inventive engineering.
Also(x2), do someone wants to help me in connecting with appropriate companies (arms manufacturers) subject to long-term partnership conditions?
Yes, it's seems like I'm another the psychically abnormal with own shitcreative, but all the same it may be interesting, isn't?
aaaeeemmm... 'nd what else I want to say, you must have good material knowledge to to have soil for proper criticism and assessment.
-
Proofs is possible in personal correspondence.
>ideas
>about
fix
>>32665898
it's 4:23 AM in the USA
>>32665904
Is it bad?
Apparently some crazy fuck is coming to my house.
Waiting in my truck with Sheila. I have ~20 minutes. I've always wanted a rainy night shootout.
Wut
>>32665793
Pizza delivery drivers aren't ALL crazy, and usually they just want a tip, not a gunfight.
>>32665798
It's a oh boy 3am thread
But it's actually 4am here
Will we ever see a nuclear surface combatant again, /k/?
Carriers
>>32665765
That of which the respective primary mission isn't aerial warfare support I didn't thing I needed to add.
>>32665741
Privyet.
What is the best value for a drop-in Glock trigger kit? There are so fucking many of them and they all far from cheap. Whats the best on for the money?
an M&P
>>32665655
M&P out of the box trigger is much worse than stock Glock's.
up
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/japan-and-uk-further-discussions-around-joint-missil-420683/
A meeting of British and Japanese ministers on 8 January resulted in the two nations pledging to enter a second phase of discussions regarding the co-development of a new air-to-air missile.
UK defence secretary Michael Fallon and foreign secretary Philip Hammond visited Japanese counterparts – Gen Nakatani and Fumio Kishida, respectively – in early January, which resulted in an agreement for deeper defence equipment and technology co-operation, plus further development of the Joint New Air-to-Air Missile (JNAAM).
-Mach 4, Range: 320km
I'm a bit excited for this. High-end Japanese sensors on high-end UK missile.
>>32665735
The other reason to be excited is the Rafale-fag tears as they shake with envy, tightly clutching onto their one-way data link Meteors
>>32665637
Will this project go through tho? The brits are pretty much in too deep with China (more than 100 billion dollars annual trade relation and significant nuke deal with China company). The chinks did played an indirect role in Australia submarine deal
Prolly it's better if Japan choose Germany or Sweden instead. Even Israel would be a better choice
Is a rifle that shoots 2-2.5 moa good enough for a all around rifle on 10 inch targets up to 400 yards or so?
What optics to use for such a thing?
And yes I mean an AR
GOOD LUCK TRYING TO HIT A 10 INCH TARGET WITH 2.5 MOA AT 400 YARDS.
>>32665621
What AR shoots 2.5 MOA that you paid more than $400 for?
>>32665674
I have read that PSA freedom line gets about 2 and a half or 2 moa with reasonably priced ammo.
>He fell for the "it ain't me" meme
Well, now what? Anyone have any suggestions for optics on a scout?
>>32665530
I own a m14 pattern rifle and desu optics make a heavy rifle heavier. If you're 9n the bench then go from it- fuck carrying that bitch around innawoods all day.
>>32665530
Vortex.
I hope to god you didn't get a Springfield.
>>32665530
>didn't build an M16A1
You get memed hard lad
Does the UK have any specific "jobs" to do in the event of war with Russia/China? I imagine America would take the lead, what would British nukes be used for?
>>32665440
irish lands
spain
poland
>>32665440
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIUK_gap
Among other things.
>>32665440
>get their shit pushed in
>donate everything to keep the queen alive
>surrender their arms to make the muslims feel better
>somehow survive the war
>claim the other allies did nothing
>bitch at the US for not helping them rebuild
What weapons do delta force operatives use?
>>32665299
last time i read something about it probably early 10s was
>glock 35s
>shorty ars precursor mk18?
this was before 9mm HP tech was found to be mature so author of article probably had old info.
>>32665299
All
>>32665310
Wrong.
Their issued is the Hk416, with Geissele SMR rails sent straight from the factory. See the pictures from burkina faso.
Sidearms are in the glock family. Typically the 22. The one in this picture seems to have the 6 second mount base plate on here.
what are some K approved boots?
pic semi related
>>32665132
fuck rhodesia
>>32665132
What are those boots? They look Bretty good
Would a nuclear attack that doesn't involve America or Russia lead to WWIII?
An American/Russian exchange is obviously going to create armageddon but is the same true for any of the following:
>India/Pakistan exchange
>Chinese use on Taiwan/Vietnam/etc.
>North Korean nuclear attack on only South Korea
>>32665034
>two of the three of those conflicts involve US allies
>>32665067
You think America would EVER authorize a nuclear response against anything that didn't involve American soil?
I don't think any nation would side with the nuclear aggressor. Whoever launches nukes first would be in the shitter, politically. It would be more like "The World vs This Guy" instead of World War