Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 2106. page

>>32832607
>If you want a consistent combat trigger why not just carry a DA/SA cocked and unlocked?

Because that's unsafe as fuck. Also people blow the inconsistent trigger thing way out of proportion when talking about DA/SA.

>inb4 "a 4lb SA trigger is the same as a 4lb striker trigger!"

>>32832607
That new CZ fixed a lot of striker fired trigger problems. The P10C I think it's called?

>>32832667
>That new CZ fixed a lot of striker fired trigger problems.

Still has that stupid ass trigger safety every not-a-glock has barring the P320.

>>32832350
Besides the glock, your arsenal is aesthetic as fuck.

>>32832732
That's wrong though. The GLOCK is second only to the BCM.

>>32831594
It's a more expensive 1100.
Also
>buying new production remshit

>>32831607
but m-muh benelli gas system

Is this essentially an 1100 with a modern gas system?

Most of the 1100's I ran into worked okay as long as the o-ring hadn't turned to leather.

>>32831319
Do NOT fuck the magazine of a Garand.

File: Giveherthestick.jpg (185KB, 1000x707px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1000x707px

>>32831319
dogmen, goatmen, bigfoot, etc are for fug, not kill

no put bullet in but

Seen this, OP? http://taskandpurpose.com/surviving-pararescue-training-simpler-think/

I wasn't even in the Air Force, let alone a PJ, so I can't say how genuine it is, but he gives a pretty detailed account of his time, and specifically mentions that the main thing that drove most of his class to quit was essentially mental exhaustion or a break in willpower, rather than anything physical.

>>32831148
>Interested in being a PJ

You might as well tell the recruiter that you want to be a General.

How do you sign up for things like this? Do you have to already be in some kind of combat arms for a number of years before you can try out?

>>32831071
It is a weapon, it can be concealed, if it is not explicitly banned in your state it is covered as a concealed weapon. Georgia, Tennessee, Arizona, all examples of this.

>>32831071
For context, I was telling a story about how the wannabe gangsta in my home town got popped with illegal carry because he used a set of knuckledusters to break a window during a burglary and me and my buddy got curious about their legality.

>>32831071
>CC permit
I seriously doubt this covers knuckle dusters

>would you get fucked?
Yeah, probably.

>>32830897
A real thread had to die so you godbotherers could wank

File: 1481599415114.jpg (1MB, 1156x1694px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1156x1694px

>>32830912
It was a worthy sacrifice.

File: IMG_0496.jpg (28KB, 209x242px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 209x242px

>>32830897
For the sake of the chances of it being actually somewhat achievable, let's say Pope Francis and the Vatican declares the Crusade, unrealistic as it may be. This way, there might be some actual support for it.

>Objective
Seeing as Israel is already a state, the Holy Land is rather secure under the Israeli Military and the Iron Dome. Rather, this Crusade would aim the cleanse the area of fundamental Islam. Maybe instead replace it with a more West-friendly version. This means our main enemies would be countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, as well as the many terrorist groups.

>Factions
There are somewhere about 8-9 million Coptic Christians in the Middle East as we speak. There are many groups fighting as we speak against ISIS.

The Kurds could be a viable ally seeing as they do control some territory in the region already. They already aim to establish and Western-friendly state, so they're probably the best bet for a Crusader hub.

Russia would be on the fence about this. They aren't exactly keen on helping Westerners conquer the ME, but it would further their goals of wiping out terror groups. It would serve nicely to have more ground control without risking their men. They would provide air support, but I doubt Vlad would even send a Vodka care package our way.

The Liberal Globalist EU would probably lose their shit and travel ban the area.

The US population would also freak, but the government might throw some support. Maybe some actual ground troops. Again, I doubt supplies.

Assad would be glad for support, but the crusaders wouldn't want to deal with him most likely.

Sounds shiggy diggy my fellow boogaloo, let's commence operation of this american firearm, designation 16, at your earliest convenience

File: HAHRE.jpg (5KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 259x194px

AY YO JEROME, WAS POPPIN BOI WE GON GET SOMA DEM CRAKAS SOON OR WAT NIGGUHHHHHHHHHH YOU KNOWS MY TRIGA FANGUS JUST AYNCHING TO GAT DET NEYN MELYOMAYTORH IN DAT WITE BOI ASSH YA MANNN

>>32830881
>>32830919

Africans don't speak Ebonics, nice try

>>32830677
>That pic

Only Two of those Russian ships actually have offensive capabilities and decent defensive capabilities.

>>32830677
In the long term Russia would not be able to maintain it's forces in Syria. They would have no resupply or reinforcements. Anything they had there would get destroyed by cruise missiles and airstrikes. Russia could try to minimalism their weapons by moving their weapons into the country side and spreading them out but Syria is still not secure enough where that could be taken to full advantage. The Russian navy in the Mediterranean would be fucked. The Black Sea fleet would be confined to Crimea. They could do some damage with their new generation of anti ship missiles and S-400 but those aren't some kind of unstoppable wonder weapon. Their land based aircraft in Syria would be fighting a loosing battle because of numbers. Most of their aircraft are ground attack and only have a handful of fighters.

>>32830677
>Russians go support and uphold Syrian government.
>Lets go attack them!
Nobody is going to get on that train.

File: 6. jebateja hawk 208.jpg (331KB, 1200x812px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1200x812px

>>32830595

>>32829947
that feel when I've always wanted one since they were introduced in Battlefield 2

>>32829969
Lols

File: kate-beckinsale-underworld-image-4.jpg (433KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 2000x1333px

I was issued one as a Police Patrol Rifle. We had the K models with short barrels and iron sights. We bought them cheap from a SWAT team out west who had them and switched away from the gun, to something else. It was a decent gun. It's gas piston, and does not get vey dirty, as fast as a AR. The Stocks were side folding, at a fixed length that never seemed to fit anyone just right. They were too long for most guys wearing Body Armor. The sights weren't that great either. They would get hot and the groups would open up. We Ditched them for Colt Ar-15s. Everyone is happier. Groups at the range are much better, during qualifying. We have 20 of them sitting in a safe. No one wants to buy them.

>>32829898
No.

>>32829898
No, they didn't have boats for them so they used them to fill gaps in the front line. THey did the same in WW1.

>>32829924
They were cool looking though

File: 1911TC-L.jpg (2MB, 2607x1983px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2607x1983px

>>32829871

>>32829871
Colt's an American classic and you can't go wrong with them. But if the Ruger suits you better, get it. I'm certain if you're just looking for a range toy, it'll fit that role.

>>32829948

I respectfully disagree.

I want to like Colt, but I just can't. They completely neglect their consumer base because they are content with their fat government contracts. The products they do make for consumers are good, but overpriced since you pay the "Pony Tax" on them.

In my opinion you can get a 1911 that is as good or better than a Colt for much cheaper. I have a Springfield Mil-Spec myself and am very pleased with it.

>>32829797
>retarded operator setups
What does that mean?

>>32829809
Scopes mounted on handguards, goosenecking over the upper.

File: 1235241245.jpg (716KB, 2016x983px) Image search: [Google]

716KB, 2016x983px

>>32829797
I avoid buying anything issued to "operators".

>>32829759

>Implying I have any one except 4chan to share this with.

Sucks only having Normie friends.

>>32829793
We can still try my friend. We can still try.

Weapons of war belong on battle fields, not our city streets.