Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1731. page

>>33296592
let us know how that goes

>>33296592
You will be fine. post results.

>>33296592
Take pics in the ER when one of you inevitably cocks up and shoots the other in the face/dick

>>33296175
>>politely ask him if I can shoot a couple mags
Sorry to tell you OP but you are the autist.

>>33296175
who is that girl. she's sexy

>>33296217
>this passes for a 10/10 in America

File: stargate world building in a nutshell.png (412KB, 800x1745px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 800x1745px

You already have an AR and a G19 for boring, practical guns. If you want to SG-1 cosplay with the PS90 go for it.

>>33295626
mp5, kriss vector

Too bad the market has fucked these. They used to go for 800$, now you're lucky to get them for 1,400.
Ammo prices are kinda fucked compared to 9mm and 45

My dude everyone needs a "just because" fun gun. Do it if you have the money.

"play stupid games win stupid prizes"
"stupid people do stupid things"
"dumb people buy dumber things"

>>33295461
>Universal handcuff key
>Kevlar shoelaces
Brought to you by Sig and Microtech!

File: unknown.png (222KB, 766x651px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 766x651px

You should also tape a razor blade to your back, right against your skin. You know, so it can cut your back while you move around.

>muh stopping power meme
If you really want to take something down in one shot just conceal carry a .500 S&W magnum. Or hell just carry your own artillery strike team in your back pocket.

What kind of a dumb question is that, of course the bigger round is going to have much more recoil.

Unless you plan on taking on SWAT teams in the back alleys of Detroit or doing federal bank heists you don't need a .44 magnum for conceal carry. That shit is for bears and moose and charging animals that's 500 pounds of fury and death. A .44 magnum won't penetrate bulletproof vests anyway. Neither will a .357 magnum.

Why are you planning on shooting cops anyway?

A .357 magnum has higher rates of putting down a person with one shot center mass than a .44 magnum. In any case enjoy your eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee if you do use it for personal defense.

Just get a J frame .38 special or something.

>>33295387
I'm not going to be shooting cops, I just want something that could stop someone faster than a 9mm, which I already have.
I said it should at least crush the ribs of someone in a vest, which I'm fairly certain a .44 would do.

>>33295387
It's not specifically for cc either. Just a gun to have.

>P-38 a shit plane.
Sprey can go lick a dick.

>>33294654
Even a broken clock can be right twice a day. The P-38 did have issues in the ETO, but at the time, it was the only fighter that had the endurance to escort bombers into Germany. And versus other 2-engine heavy fighters, the P-38 was the most maneuverable.

>>33294784
I was mostly talking about that last line. The P-51 was far from the best fighter of WWII in any capacity.

File: eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee2.jpg (25KB, 504x387px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 504x387px

>>33294484
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>33294484
What?

Woah, wtf. Explain?

It increases your sex appeal if that counts for something

>>33294363
Get it faggot.

Is it worrth it? Not really. If you are willing to go with .380 there are smaller lighter options that are more modern AND cheaper. If you want 9mm luger then this isnt your gun. If you want to carry a cool gun then get this gun.

TL;DR
Not really worth it. Spend the money on something modern

>>33294023
I own both.

Yessum.
Several of each, for every occasion!

>>33294023
Both. What kind of question is that? You don't do your own garden work?

>>33293367
>How would you defend an island in the 1920s-1940s?

With ships.

Coastal submarines to deter ships and merchant submarines to bring in at least a trickle of supplies through a blockade

>>33293461
>Coastal submarines

And where exactly are these subs supposed to dock and replenish?

File: oneshot_shotgun[1].jpg (227KB, 800x650px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 800x650px

>>33291750
>What is your opinion about 3D printed guns and gun accessories?
Poor.
Maybe for some rando little plastic bits that aren't easy to replicate by hand and aren't subject to much wear and tear?

If you want a bare-bones gun to kill someone with at close range, hardware store will give you better results.

If you want a receiver, you can cast a better one from epoxy, or have a machinist cut you a real one in a few hours.

It's just shitty quality and the printing equipment is MUCH more expensive than most alternatives, and some simple guns could be made even faster than a 3D printer could print them. Your only advantage is that it does complex things quickly.

pic related. Far more lethal, reliable, inexpensive and probably faster to make than any 3D printed gun.

>>33291946
What if your aim is to make one for more than a single shot?

You can use other materials than plastic. The whole weapon could be made lighter, easier to modify. Replacement of parts would be much easier.

The technology now is uite expensive, but in a few years time it could become the leading manufacturing process.

https://all3dp.c om/3d-printed-grenade-launcher-rambo/

>>33292217
I realize your goal here is just to jerk off about 3D printing. It will never be fast or cost effective enough to be used in any real production scenario, of which there are very few that cannot be filled with EDM instead. The idea of 3D printing as a dangerous form of weapons proliferation is an even bigger meme than "muh glock is invisible to metal detectors".

>>33291678
>it can't be an MDR

;^)

File: mastype625.jpg (83KB, 752x969px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 752x969px

Hard to find decent modeen designs since bullpups and battle rifles are both outdated.
So I choose the 7.62 NATO FAMAS prototype.

File: 1_scar_bullpup_399259939673.jpg (104KB, 1280x601px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1280x601px

>>33291678
SCAR 17s

Because we started giving medals for just partaking instead of winning

>>33291175
The good guys aren't always the winners.

>>33291175

muh aesthetics, muh ideology, muh plenty of reasons...

>>33291189

In this case they mostly are though

DON'T HURT HIM YOU FUCK

name him Hitler the Kike Killer

name hime KeK

>>33290233
Kubby
Vining
Schwarzkopf
Pershing
Slim