Which of these ammo bandoliers should I get get for my mossberg 88 12 gauge? Stepping up my home defense game now that WW3 is on the horizon...
>>33559149
Buy a surplus claymore mine bag.
>>33559188
no claymore
If you want to keep the shit on the gun, get a decent side-saddle. Loading from a sling is probably fucking stupid.
Bandolier my dood.
last thread
>>33555115
US launches attack on Syria:
https://www.rt.com/news/383782-us-strikes-syria-tomahawaks/
Hey atleast Drumpf can enjoy a day of praise from the nevertrump neocons. Tomorrow theyll bash his cock about how he emboldened Assad to use chem weapons by making the statement about how the Syrian people will decide Assad's future.
It's never happening. Pol is always wrong.
>>33559105
That many Tomahawks, mostly likely precision guided in by drones, means the base is very likely beyond repair.
>>33559114
No, the neocons will start crying about how we don't have boots on the ground yet.
Fucking CNN is already saying that we need to take it further and start putting troops on the ground in Syria
What does /k/ think of Japan's defense force?
And since this is an imageboard, does anyone have pics of said defense force to share?
>>33559103
I've never actually seen or heard anything about them outside of that picture. Curious myself.
>>33559103
Not bad and good equipment minus their inexperience.
>inb4 jap tank with thrown track pic.
Just wish they sold more shit to other countries and were less stuck up (specifically their right wing who make hilarious shit like GATE which somehow implies Americans wouldn't ass rape them all. Like in Okinawa all the time).
>>33559103
According to "gate" they are better than green berets
What's the oldest firearm that a /k/ommando owns?
>>33558903
I have a Turkish Mauser from 1894
Remington 1858 chambered in .44, SN dates it to roughly 1863.
However, grandmother has Kentucky Percussion Rifle hanging above fireplace. My best guess is circa 1840s?
it might be boof or another guy that owns something like a 17th century flintlock rifle
59 MOTHERFUCKING MISSILES MY GUY
90 million dollars my man
>>33558516
Here I was thinking Hilary was the war monger.
>>33558644
The fuck are you autists talking about?
Why do you guys spend money on guns when you could be investing it in a well diversified portfolio that can generate reasonably satisfactory returns that will help you reach your retirement goals sooner?
portfolio no make boom noise good
>>33558496
I maxed out my 401(k) and IRA year. I also manage a considerable number of rental homes. Get your weak shit off of /k/, you dickshit
>>33558496
I plan to retire as a custom gunsmith making fine rifles and repairing milsurps with 100% accurate reproduction parts.
Having a portfolio of guns will be a well diversified investment.
How will you defeat the ayy's, /k/? What if you woke up and your town was in the middle of being invaded?
You are getting ready for the ayys, right anon?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbWEHyB2XKk
>>33558479
I would grab my ayy-K74 and commence operations
>tfw you will never be XCOM: militia edition and tactically remove ayylmaos
why even live?
>>33558479
>How will you defeat the ayy's
Faith in the Emperor
Just as the title states this thread is dedicated to anti-gun arguments and its counter counter arguments. You can come up with your own arguments and counter them or an anon can post an argument and another anon counters it. I'll start off with the most basic argument:
"Why do you need a firearm when we have police?"
The second amendment makes most effective gun control illegal. Therefore, unless they want to repeal it they are wasting their time.
Pretty much everyone who wants to ban guns outright has no experience with them. Case in point, OP's pic with a fucking whole cartridge coming out of the barrel.
IMO, the most dangerous are the fudds who want heavy restrictions.
"Why does anyone need an AR-15?"
"Only the military needs assault rifles"
Tell that to the guy in Oklahoma last week.
Slaves are disarmed by masters; free citizens retain their right to be armed. Being a slave has always been low-risk, and though few people want to admit it, many crave the safety of slavery and are frightened by the risks inherent in freedom. Which is fine - I make no judgments; if you wish to be a slave, then be one and be happy. But do not attempt to make a slave of me, because I am, and wish to remain, a free man.
>need CCW
>MUST fit in pocket of tailored dress pants & smart shorts with minimal printing
Is the LCP my best choice? Alternatives?
pls help
>>33557946
I just got to fuck with a couple of pocket 1911s. Kimber if you care more about shiny. Mustang if you like aesthetic. Sig if you like aesthetics and ergonomics.
>>33558011
I eyed a few up but they are much heavier than I need.
It's not going to be in jeans, it's going to be in thin, tailored suit pants and I'll be moving.
Lightweight is a key priority. Should have put it in OP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS3kiRYcDAo
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/04/06/us-launches-missiles-into-syria-in-response-to-chemical-weapons-attack.html
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/06/politics/donald-trump-syria-military/index.html
>Someone somewhere does something to people nobody cares about
>Time to spend more taxpayer money!
Getting pretty sick of this meme.
>>33557972
Gotta protect those freedoms. As we all well know, there is no better way to defend our freedoms than blowing up shitskins half a world away.
Fucking radical. I knew Trump would keep things interesting when I voted for him.
Just got denied re-enlistment due to neck tattoos. I'm fucking bummed guys. Recruiter is gonna give me the name of a place that does removals but shit man I'm having trouble making fucking rent. They were fine in 2005. I guess shit is changing. MOS I was going for was 68whiskey. Goal was to get my PhD in medicine with the GI Bill.
Feels thread?
>>33557874
Get rid of that pubic hair on your head
They were fine in 05 because of the surge you dummy. You could look like beetlejuice then and still get in.
>>33557874
Only degenerates get tattoos anywhere that can't be covered by a shirt.
Unless you're a woman.
How effective are these?
>>33557791
Very if used correctly.
>>33557791
Assuming you use them properly to avoid breaking your own fingers, they can hit pretty hard.
>>33557801
So would you use these if you wanted to hurt someone badly but not kill them?
"When you kill innocent children, innocent babies — babies, little babies — with a chemical gas that is so lethal, people were shocked to hear what gas it was..."
reality:
"U.S. officials said the gas was likely chlorine, with TRACES of a nerve agent LIKE sarin," maybe.
https://apnews.com/ba4881c7d94b4eca8b5ec8021a96f7cc
>>33557711
Oy vey, we need another war in the Middle East. To protect our freedom, you see.
>>33557711
>Hear about gas attacks
>MFW
>get really happy
>realize you'll still probably never be involved with it
Such is life as a CBRN in the US Army
>>33557761
She's perfect
Post Jap weapons
>Anti aircraft sites
>>33557417
Anime is weaponized autism
>>33557417
Love my type 38, would like a Murata and Type 30
Bought a Type 38 not too long ago and now I've been reading more and more about the Imperial Japanese Army.
They certainly had their own way of doing things and even if it wasn't the best of the war, it's still extremely interesting.
If you lived in game of thrones, assuming you weren't going out into one of the battles, wouldn't it be advantageous to wear a rapier than the broad swords all the other characters seem to always carry?
>>33556636
no, but whats your logic here and why on /k/ of all places? this aint innawesteros
>>33556636
Probably because they were compensating for their tiny baby penises. RAPEiers should not be allowed. I can't wait until the dragon princess kills all these problematic a**holes.
>>33557200
>swords
>weapons
Really though, OP. Not sure your point. Why would a rapier provide any advantage?