What's better, USGI or pmag?
>>33689539
Depends on your POU.
Lancer
>>33689599
Shooting paper at the indoor range and muh home defense
DO NOT RAPID FIRE AT GUN RANGE
>http://nypost.com/2017/04/18/facebook-murder-suspect-was-warned-not-to-rapid-fire-at-gun-range/
All NE-OH anons should go rapid fire there.
https://www.google.com/maps/uv?hl=en&pb=!1s0x8831abb4d93ea6b7:0x2b95ee661ea73fb0!2m19!2m2!1i80!2i80!3m1!2i20!16m13!1b1!2m2!1m1!1e1!2m2!1m1!1e3!2m2!1m1!1e5!2m2!1m1!1e4!3m1!7e115!4s/maps/place/Sherwin%2BShooting%2BSports/@41.6425285,-81.4528575,3a,75y,180.21h,90t/data%3D*213m4*211e1*213m2*211s7HzlpevG-_q-HmPyAm380Q*212e0*214m2*213m1*211s0x0:0x2b95ee661ea73fb0!5sSherwin+Shooting+Sports+-+Google+Search&imagekey=!1e2!2s7HzlpevG-_q-HmPyAm380Q&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiMvO_Tka_TAhXr34MKHcilCQsQpx8IeDAN
>>33689222
Checked.
>range says no more than one shot per two seconds
>fire every 1.9 seconds
>have a camera on each stall
Fucking hell.
This is a reminder to never trust niggers. No matter how normal they may seem do NOT relax around blacks.
First, look at this launcher that has clearly been manufactured in a factory.
.
.
Next, look at how quickly a bunch of posters will jump in and derail this thread with these negative points-
- obviously plastic tube and fittings from local hardware store
- ignore injection molded fittings and trigger unit
- OK then maybe they manufacture parts out in desert
- surely they can make this, what about the shadetree gunsmiths in the Khyber?
- anyway, they weld hillbilly armor on Toyotas, don't they, and this is the same level of technology?
- sweetie/darling posting
- HAMAS ISIS false comparison
- Israel can do no wrong
- anyone against the idea of this being homemade is a /pol/tard
- go back to your containment board divide-and-conquer tactics
- capitalizing the word "Workshop" in an attempt to make it a more serious sounding threat
- continuously calling the launchers "home made" without evidence
- continuously stating the many pictures of the launchers are of different models when they are quite clearly the same.
.
.
TLDR: stinks like there is some money behind the shills trying to stop us looking closely at these launchers, and I want to know why.
Did I miss any of your required talking points? C'mon shills, help me out here.
Could be made in an illegal factory somewhere, like someone has studied some rocketlaunchers and figured out a design that they're capable of with their tooling and resources.
Because it looks kind of shitty to be properly manuactured, but it also looks kind of too good to be made in someone's shed somewhere.
Whether or not Israel is involved, I can't really say anything about.
Go ask the Middle East Thread, those guys are knowledgeable enough to give your hypothesis the ass-fucking it deserves
Legit Luftwaffe thread; no 1946 shitposting allowed.
>=/
Why they didn't put airbreaks in them?
>>33690374
>No Kreuz
it's neutered
So, what does /k/ think about these? Are they any good? Should they be used?
Gimicky waste of money.
>>33689026
Bump yourself off a subway platform
>>33689026
They can be fun.
The only really practical application I see if you're building one of those "bump-SAW"s.
I Told You It Would Be Gotes You Whiny Bitches Edition
Old; >>33686603
>>33688873
If he said the geiselle mk8, then he obviously didn't read the "looks good" part
>>>33688853
>>>33688855
>>>33688858
>>>33688868
I'm thinking rail system and maybe bolt.
Bolt I understand why it's so expensive; they did all sorts of cool shit to it.
But what's the difference in the rail system?
Guaranteed profits.
Suppose you guys would be best to ask; Can we get a general prep thread without weapons?
>>33688538
>/k/ - Weapons
>>33688544
>Implying we don't have armor and clothing threads
>>33688538
Weapons board. No weapons.
Fuck the fuck off and never return.
AK General /akg/
Plum Variety Edition
>Thread #278
Old thread here >>33678901
>AK Buyer's Guide
http://pastebin.com/YdEkhdva
>>33688396
? I don't understand. was it a website or a gun show? I know kalinkaoptics.com and money isnt really a problem at all. They look nice though.
>F-22 program cost: 66 billion
>F-35 program cost: 1.5 trillion
Chairforce fags will defend this
>tfw no F/B-22
Why even have an air force?
>In March 2013, USAF test pilots, flying with pre-operational software that did not utilize the all-aspect infrared AAQ-37 DAS sensor, noted a lack of visibility from the F-35 cockpit during evaluation flights, which would get them consistently shot down in combat. Defense spending analyst Winslow Wheeler concluded from flight evaluation reports that the F-35A "is flawed beyond redemption";[196] in response, program manager Bogdan suggested that pilots worried about being shot down should fly cargo aircraft instead.[197]
>>33688058
>F-22 program: 197 show ponies
>F-35 program: 2,443 workhorses
Why arent combination guns more common? I could see it having very practical use
>>33687931
One factor could be that getting two barrels to point in the exact same direction is actually pretty difficult. Also no semiauto.
Like I imagine a 3006 12ga o u would be super useful for deer or hog hunting
>>33687931
Because in America there isn't a limit on the number of guns you can own, and it's generally cheap to do. So we just buy multiple guns if we want to have multiple uses. In Europe, such things are more difficult and expensive (generally speaking), so combination guns and drillings and such make more sense.
Daily reminder if you carry a glock you are probably a young thug or a wannabe cop. Real patriots carry a .45 commander 1911.
>>33687805
Why would I want to be a patriot?
>>33687805
what if I cc a ria 10mm?
>am I patriotic now?
>>33687814
This tbhfam
Fuck America and Fuck trump
What pistol should I get? I'd like semi auto reliability
>>33687625
well if you are a burger. the S&W M&P Shield 9mm is available for $240-$270 dollars after rebate.
>>33687625
get a hi-point. They're super reliable.
>>33687769
Sad but true.
What do you guys think about Finnish M05 camo? I've been considering something to replace my woodland and the M05 looks like a good choice for my environment.
I also just discovered these guys yesterday and they have a ton of cool shit. Some neat patches too, even though most of them aren't morale.
Is it worth buying from the Finns and getting a cool new scheme to use or should I stick to the standard camos you find within more NATO-centered countries?
If anyone goes on their site, let me know if you find anything cool.
>>33687180
Finn here.
Varusteleka are based as fuck, and were my gateway to post-army /k/ommando life. M05 is also sexy as fuck, and works damn well in its intended environments (nordic pinewood-filled forests). It's very similar to CADPAT, so if you dig that & think it works in your area, M05 is a safe bet.
The legit military M05 gear was a bit hit or miss back in my days, but the stuff Leka sells is their own, improved versions. As in, high quality stuff, not made in some far-east shithole with child labor.
Pic related is the "Pakkaspuku", which translates into cold-weather suit. Perfect for late-Fall / Spring environments, and as upper bodywear with snow-suit's pants for that eye-tricking 50-50 camo combo.
>>33687281
I'm actually Canadian so there's probably a decent overlap with the environments, and I like M05 partially because of the similarities to CADPAT (which is a camo scheme I will hopefully be issued soon once my applications go through).
I've always wanted to visit Finland, but money is tight. And the language is beyond me. Eh, one day.
Thanks for the info based Finbro
>>33687327
>I'm actually Canadian so there's probably a decent overlap with the environments
More like we're exactly the same most of the time. Hockey, cracking open bears, cold and dark half the year... ring any bells?
But yeah, I still recall some ye olde /k/ threads confusing M05 with CADPAT (and vise versa) when it started being wielded more widely.
>I've always wanted to visit Finland, but money is tight.
Unless you got good buds, you better have some cash. Our country's not Norway-tier expensive (damn oil slurpers), but the overall prices tend to follow the simple formula of :
"take the USD cost, switch the currency symbol to €, add VAT of 24%".
>And the language is beyond me.
trust me, everyone and our mothers already speak decent English. Thank the subtitles-centric import of all media + the rise of the internet.
If ya ever end up lost in our neighborhood, you're welcome you to come and blast some paper with my AK.
Have some more M05 porn. This time the Winter variant.
What type of gun did the Facebook Killer use?
>>33687150
a gat
>>33687150
It's a glock of some kind
>>33687150
That's a problem solver if I'm not mistaken
Are belts even all that much lighter way to carry ammunition than 30 round usgi aluminum magazines?Especially when you factor in the weight of the mechanism necessary for feeding the belt into the gun?
How about gunners just having a beefed up version of that country's armed forces' rifle? What about actually removing the gunner role completely, atleast for when it comes to intermediate calibers? Just have everyone carry two or three more magazines and beef up the service rifle slightly with a bit thicker barrel and so on, i'm not sure if the ar-15 could be all that easily adapted to this role but i know that many piston guns atleast could easily perform sufficiently.
>>33687117
Not really. You have to keep in mind that belts are just for machine guns, which need large magazine capacities more than your average rifle. So unless you have one of those, you don't need belts at all.
>>33687117
Colt canada solved this a while ago. Brits have the L86 LSW. AUG HBAR for Austria. Automatic riflemen have had what you're talking about for a good while. Hell the soviet bloc had the RPK since forever. Also why the USMC just adopted the M27 IAR to replace the M249
>>33687166
Man what's up with that silly handguard.