What can the right do that the left can't?
>>33806128
>What can the right do that the left can't?
Trigger autists who have an incurable case of magnumitis.
>>33806128
pew pew!!
>>33806128
Expand to .51 inches?
Making a purchase thru CMP, M1 Garand ("special field grade") or 1903a3 via creedmoor?
Or wait for Phillipines to send more Garands and get a cheaper one?
>>33806105
That almost looks like a Fulton?
>>33806140
dlet that rn
service grade from cmp
Everyone and their mother loves to shit on the Generals of the Western Front in WWI for wasting lives and not knowing that their assaults wouldn't work.
No one seems to have a good answer for what should have been done instead.
Note, you can't just say "End the War" or "Invent Tanks Early"
Realistically, what should the Generals have been doing in 1914 and 1915 that they weren't doing?
>>33805953
who else would you blame for the huge butchers bill, OP?
the view is justified in this case.
>>33805953
Smaller scale, limited objective offensives. You're not gonna break through and force a 20 mile retreat.
>>33806980
If a gigantic operation across a miles long front can only get a couple yards advance, can you really expect smaller scale attacks to do anything?
Post police officers that knew how to kick some fucking ass
He died fighting
>>33805879
>Last straight person in 2020 trying to escape gay gangbang
>>33805879
>>33806579
You mean /k/'s wet dream?
The AEK-971 and the AK-107 share the same recoil system that eliminates recoil. Though, recently the Russian government said they were going to adopt the AEK-971. But I was thinking, hasn't the AEK-971 always considered to be more expensive and a bit more complicated than the regular AK design? Why not adopt the cheaper and simpler to produce AK-107 since it is more basal? Is it ergonomics they're looking for? Because they could just do an ergonomics upgrade to the AK-107 if they really wanted to. So what makes the AEK-971 different and better than the AK-107? Is the reliability the same?
Edit:
The AK-12 has good ergonomics and the AK-107 could have had a similar upgrade.
AEK is good looking
>>33807516
It does win over the 107 with the aesthetics.
Was this the most successful military occupation in the history of warfare besides the Mongols occupying Eastern Europe and the Middle East?
>>33805516
The 2003 invasion? Certainly ranks there being one of the best invasions of all times.
The occupation/aftermath of the invasion? One of the worst and most humiliating for America off all time. Not only did 1.5 million Iraqi people die, it killed around 5000 americans and the utter incompetence and total failure of establishing a WORKING government that REPRESENTS ALL IRAQI'S and NOT JUST SHIITES has directly led to the creation of IS and its horrors.
I just hope that many of the Americans who were old enough to vote for George Bush here on /k/ know what blood they have on their hands.
>>33805680
>waaa we killed each other after our government couldn't stop us from killing each other.
you're one to lecture us on taking responsibility for our actions, abdool.
>>33805698
1: I am a white caucasian Christian from the Netherlands.
2: 1.5 million died under your watch. Sounds to me you did one hell of a bad job of an occupation. Your country occupied and policed another country and 1,500,000 people died. That is criminal negligence in my book.
Prove that the SA80 is not the worst looking gun ever.
>>33805319
the Luger exists
>>33805326
delet this
>>33805319
>>33805326
I am sorry but you both are wrong. Pic related, the Insas, the ugliest and worst gun there is.
If war actually happened with the Norks, what kind of weapons could /k/ expect to bring back? Would there be anything of real value or just sentimental cheap nork stuff that reminds you of goodtimes?
>>33804839
they'll just be shitty AKs and other slavshit
best thing to bring back from the war would be a qt nork waifu
>>33804839
You are not allowed to bring them back, it was near impossible in Iraq and Afghanistan and I cannot see NK being different.
>>33804839
Fucking nothing good. The army strictly forbids bring-backs of enemy weapons now. It's ridiculous.
Burger here. Not sure about other countries though likely the same.
What kind of shape is the most conductive to high speed operators operating the fastest?
Endurance. If your ass can take a beating and keep going you got the best body type.
>>33804278
And why is it skinny manlets?
Ottermode is best.
English teacher here.
I teach 12th Grade English literature at a rural school, however, years of liberal propaganda have rendered my students martially ignorant and fearful of firearms. What /k/ books/films could I expose my students to without getting fired?
Book: Mein Kampf
Film: The Greatest Story Never Told
>>33803717
>without getting fired
A degree of subtlety is necessary.
>>33803717
I used to know that kid when I was in school.
fun targets edition
old thread >>33800943
>>33803498
To keep anon angry
When will people learn that if a person is under 5'8" then they will never operate?
>>33802760
Audie Murphy.
Mike Vining? Go back to /fit9k/ you sperg.
>>33802760
>implying you can't operate in a tank
Springfield Armory's facebook BTFO. The chan won't let me post the link apparently. It keeps telling me it's spam. Go look at their growing number of 1 star reviews. The hate is flowing!
If this post goes through I'll try to add the link in another post.
https://www.BOOK OF FACES.com/SpringfieldArmoryUSA/reviews/?_fb_noscript=1
>>33802572
Screenshot nigger.
>>33802572
>"the chan"
>posting about facebook
>Russian army puts its enormous new remote-controlled robot tank boasting a 30mm automatic gun and six missiles through its paces
>The Russian army has been testing a remote-controlled tank at a military base
>A video shows the unmanned robot scaling hills, dusty paths and flows of water
>At the end of the footage the tank, named The Vikhr, fires from its 30 mm gun
>A report from the SIPRI found that Russia is the third biggest military spender
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4457892/Russian-army-puts-new-remote-controlled-robot-tank-test.html
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G21dinft3mY
Looks like manned tanks are about to become obsolete.
Fully autonomous tanks when?
>>33802233
VATNIK GO HOME
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>33802289
Shut up.
>>33802233
Tbh, it looks like just a BMP-3 with unmanned turret and some electronics cramped in to make it radio-controlled. So, yeah, it's not like that's a big fucking breakthrough.
>>33802233
inb4 it's hacked and starts shooting at vatniks
Now that the dust has settled, just how big a deal was it really to drop a MOAB on ISIS in Afghanistan?
>>33801944
a weapon unused is a useless weapon, my child
>>33801944
It's just a big bomb, nothing special.
>>33801944
I read an AP report that stated about 100 fighters were killed and a tunnel system collapsed by that strike. That really fucks with ISIS fighters heads that we are willing to drop that kind of shit on them, and we have more of those bombs.
To the rest of the world it's dickwaving that American acceptionalism is on the rise again.