Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1215. page

The Lancaster would like to have a word with you mate.

>>33953735
fpbp

File: he177a02.jpg (113KB, 1100x793px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1100x793px

Probably the He-177

Yes, let lil Jamal-kun live and enjoy spending extra money in court even if his claims don't hold up. That's still either thousands of dollars more down the drain than if he was dead or at least higher legal premiums for you.

Self-defense situations cost a defender at least $10,000 minimum in court. By letting the cunt live, you doubled the fucking price.

You know that whole, "Don't point your gun at something you don't intend to destroy", rule?

Apply that, and then apply yourself

>>33953529
are they black?

I currently own a
Springfield 1911 (TRP)
Glock 19
Sig p226
Ruger GP100
Cz-75B
Arsenal AK-47
And a Ruger takedown (AR15)

>>33953487
Where do you plan to store it? Is it going to be in the open for people to see as a talking piece or in a safe where no one will ever see it unless you go to the range?

Go with pre 2000s model 700s.

Bumping for interest.

The Irish military has little to no offensive weaponry with which to strike positions in Northern Ireland.
The Irish pride themselves on having a Pacificst foreign policy with a purely defensive force.

IIRC, theyre too cucked to do anything

Lets see
>Navy
Literally no ships with missiles. None.
>Air force
7 (SEVEN) turboprop aircraft capable of mounting light machine guns and rockets. Nothing else capable of mounting armament.
>Army
Small, and 0 (ZERO) tanks

For all intents and purposes, this military might as well not exist.

>>33953264
>implying they need it
The fifth column would swarm over the countryside in a day or two. The only question would be the blowback from the UK and it's not like they are capable of mounting a D-Day in this day and age. Most likely the government would fall and Scotland and Wales would choose to secede as well.

>>33952749

I don't own a glock, but $50 for a fucking glock mag? I thought they were supposed to be cheap and plentiful?

My M&P mags are around $20-30 a piece.

>>33952749
Still overpriced.

https://www.natchezss.com/glock-factory-original-glock-23-magazine-40-s-w-13-rd.html

>>33952749
That pic is from the Sandy Vagina era. It has to be.

Y-Y Fakey down the stairs, quickscope wallbang quad through the door.

File: 1474907618285.jpg (510KB, 622x1500px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 622x1500px

>>33952551
Try it ya cunts

>>33952551
Get a warrant

Decades of horrific mismanagement.

>>33952526
No innovation

They make AR's and 1911's. both of which are old designs, and not even originally theirs.

File: cheerleaders retarded.jpg (50KB, 582x600px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 582x600px

>>33952599
>Colt
>1911
>not even originally theirs
Nigger you what?

File: Sunrise.jpg (817KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

817KB, 1920x1080px

>>33952428
Considering there's no way to replicate the iconic sunrise suit without some sowing skills I'd recommend just some hobo-tier operate stuff with a gasmask for the stalker look.

>>33952456
I wasn't gonna go Sunrise suit, just a STALKER theme. But the problem of doing something distinctively STALKER-y is that all of it seems Iike a heatstroke waiting to happen in the AZ summer.

Is there some slavshit milsurp I can order online that's bearable in hot weather and I can use to throw together a STALKER cosplay in 2 weeks?

>>33952597
not slavshit, but for a gas mask try an Avon S-10 or fm-12. You'll thank me when you don't have tunnel vision and mesothelioma

>>33952378
Lots of countries use the FN MAG.

Isn't that what the Mk 48 exists for?

>>33952378
It's the best GPMG other than a MG3.

>deal with if fuckboi

>>33952158
Because of a multitude of reasons.

For one, planes were short ranged, experimental, unreliable, heavily effected by the weather, couldn't carry much and were very slow. So, sure they could take down any other ship if they got a good hit but the chances of them being usable were low without having your carrier very close by.

For another, battleships and other such crafts could put up an effective AA screen against these slow moving craft and resist some bombing thanks to their damage control measures.

However as planes gained in these regards, very little could be done to close the gap on the side of battleships.


Also the fact that the air force and navy often got into a fight as to who should command these planes and so on. Either resulting in the navy not wanting to waste their budget to build a floating airbase for another branch or the navy having to fund the development of an additional kind of each plane, since the air force didn't need to worry about launching from carriers.

Add in the fact that many of the supporters on the aircraft side were, echoing a similar problem in the army, lower in rank and thus ignored or didn't get promoted specifically because they shared different beliefs from their superiors. This was part of the reason why WW 1 saw such terrible losses to the newest weapons, as the people who knew how to use them weren't able to contribute.

>>33952158

The only carrier that the US ever built that was kind of questionable was the first one, CV-1 Langley, which was a replenishment vessel that was repurposed into a carrier. The next two carriers, Lexington and Saratoga, were built on battlecruiser hulls, and they were very capable warships from the beginning.

>>33952158
>Why question is, what arguments were there in favor of battleships over carriers?
MUH STOPPIN POWAH

>>33952076
Why the hell would you want it out there? That's kinda screwing people from the Lowcountry, is it not?

>>33952426
What would best for them then?

>>33952426
Beaver dam shooting range maybe?

>>33951913
So what should i get? Its also worth noting im a bit of a poorfag so lets keep it under $550 preferably

Okay, sure, that's fine.
Anything you pick will be particularly uncomfortable compared to lightweight polymer guns, but that's your call.

PPK is a great firepower to size ratio and snubnose wheelguns have been a staple of the industry for ages.

Just remember that any gun is better than no gun, and if you do eventually find it too uncomfortable to wear daily it's better to swallow your pride and get something more functional than aesthetic.

Is there a particular reason

>muh aesthetics

is at the top of your list for things you want out of a CCW gun?

Most any household items shoved up your opponent's anus can cause serious damage.

either faggot or atf? should kill self either way

>>33951899
Sure. I own a lamp AND a hallway.

File: post-1-0-83014400-1322411500.jpg (14KB, 400x258px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 400x258px

>>33951874
if only, too bad about the jamming issues

MP-412 REX is my pick

File: spacemagic.jpg (7KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 300x168px

>>33951874
This is the only right answer

File: 794706f8e683ba0559871ae8fa06213a.jpg (60KB, 758x650px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 758x650px

>>33951874

File: IMG_20170513_123744874_HDR.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

Also inb4 "move out of California". Pic related is literally three blocks from the gun shop where I saw that lower. That's some good living, right there.

>>33951766
a lower is a lower is a lower. don't get billet, stick with milspec. that price is okay.

now build a cucked as fuck rifle begging for an end to all this.

is suggest monster man grips.

>>33951923

fuck tho staring at that pic, did the gun shop just take apart a ruger they had? it looks like it use to be a finished gun, and why would ruger just ssell a lower?
something is fucky.