Erasing the Outlines

File: 3.jpg (431KB, 407x835px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 407x835px

The drawing that is not in the first picture. Also the first one of the series.

File: 2.jpg (465KB, 477x715px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 477x715px

Detail of the drawing above.

>>3133999
I like em

>>3133999
Great stuff!

>>3133999
What the fuck does that even mean?

File: nuclearshadows2.jpg (95KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 533x800px

>>3134996
OP is advocating for nuclear genocide

>>3134996
it means "the pieces don't hold up on their own so i came up with a pretentious description to convince you they're good"

>>3133999
can I touch her ass?

>>3133999
Sorry OP, like it or hate it but /ic/ isn't exactly filled with appreciators of post modern art.
I like the your idea, I do, but that's about it. I don't know where to lead the discussion from here.

>>3133999
I kinda like them but your description is really pretentious

>>3133999
I don't find the description to be pretentious, but I do have a lil' tip for you - don't tell the viewer what they can or cannot do. You're an artist, you stimulate your viewer's mind by asking questions, not answering them for them.

You made me like it less with your typical over-interpretation babbling that probably makes no sense to anyone but you.
But they look interesting, kinda like these crime-scene outlines where the body was laying

if you got rid of the one on the extreme left and let the pictures stand on their own they would be nice.
>Let the pieces speak for themselves, man

>>3133999
/ic/ stands for illustration concept art. ;)

>>3133999
Feel like I'm beat over the head with your concept, you didn't even need to explain it. What's that other dude. Lucian Freud. He does a better job, try studying him

look at me, i am an artist, and im thinking about how to make you think, can you see that?