Archived threads in /ic/ - Artwork/Critique - 549. page

File: oooo.png (120KB, 351x285px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 351x285px

>>2818448
blog? :^)))))))))

>>2818448
i love it
> more?

>>2818448
There is nothing to improve as there is no ambition I can't see reached in your pic
By that I mean that you made "cartoony" instead of real anatomy or shading or whatever. It would be better if you said in what you want to get better.
Coloring?
Rendering?
Shading?
Dynamism?
Anatomy?
Art style?
Composition?
Perspective?
Strokes/lineart?

>>2817012
It is worth it, but it's beginners get bored of it quickly, so it's easier to tell them to just draw something.

Yes. Five, ten minutes every (other) day before you start, make circles, parallel lines, ellipses, and curves focusing on repetition of form.

>>2817012
just use photoshop retard

industry standard

industry

s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d

File: a493c75e-85f5-490a-b3a2-1b674aff9773.png (1MB, 803x960px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 803x960px

>>2818506
The second

there are threads for this, kill yourself you retard. sage

File: 44dc0a75-2946-4e44-9e33-a438d657771b.png (607KB, 960x915px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 960x915px

>>2818506
The third

File: 3356_4293_web.jpg (200KB, 1500x1004px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1500x1004px

Selfbump

File: 3356_5003_web7.jpg (200KB, 1329x600px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1329x600px

No. 2

File: Screenshot_1.png (1KB, 347x23px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 347x23px

if you were my retarded son i'd put it on the fridge/10

Wow! This is pretty good. You have some really appealing shape design and fantastic linework. Your understand of cloth is pretty good as well, lots of artists including myself struggle with this. I think you can improve the detail though but overall your fundamentals are strong, do you have a blog or something? I wanna follow your work

>>2818150
Wow, I wasn't expecting this much enthusiasm! Really appreciate the response, and the detail you put into it. I don't have a blog, but I was considering opening a deviantart. Might do that tonight and get you a link. Again, thanks for the response.

File: image.jpg (69KB, 672x372px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 672x372px

>>2818141

Is that Eclair from dog days?

??

Anyways, I'll give it and 8/8 m8.

multiple mirrors

Seeing how someone draws a circle is really a good way of determining their skill level. It's kind of funny.

>>2816439
This. Freehand circles and elipses are basically 80% of knowing how to draw

>>2816434
I had a professor for geoscience modeling that could freehand perfect circles. Couldn't draw for shit though.

>>2818007
yes

>>2818007
fishe wan the food

>>2818007
I liked it desu

>>2818060
tracing

>>2818060
circles, ellipses, straight lines
gestures... in perspective!
anything fun in my opinion is a pretty good warm up, just to get you in the drawing mode

>>2816794
there was an anon who recorded most of his streams but he died.

>>2816796
>tfw not sure if recalling correctly or not but was sure that anon said he was in the military
So he really died

>>2816794
convince him to use livestream or subscribe to picarto

File: I have a $75,000 art degree. I am more intelligent than you could ever hope to be..jpg (200KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1000x750px

Fun fact. Nobody really "gets it". They're all a bunch of debt-ridden brainlets using big "esoteric" art words like "composition" inappropriately to sound smart.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor%27s_New_Clothes

>>2814207
>I've also been told that what I interpret from time to time isn't what it "means"
If what you're interpreting is "this part kind of looks like a horse" that makes sense, it's not supposed to represent anything concrete (for non-objective art, not all abstract art). if you get a different emotion than the artist supposedly intended that's fine.

>But is the art really good if it does not speak for itself?
No. Pollock would agree with this sentiment more than anyone. He didn't want to convey some try-hard message, his works are just paint on a canvas, neither representing nor pretending to be anything else.

>Does it really require a lenghty education in the subject to "get" it?
No, it can be immediate, or an acquired taste. Education helps a lot of the time because people have a lot of preconceived notions about what art is or should be, and that colors their engagement with a piece. So you need a broader look at art and art history to understand art has had many different forms, defined differently by different times and cultures, and doesn't necessarily need to fit a certain mold. Learning about art history doesn't mean you will or should like everything that you learn about, but it can inform your judgement and broaden narrow views by deconstructing the barriers that we put up due to personal or cultural definitions of art.

This anon is correct >>2814212
The whole "modern art"meme is just people saying "If you don't get this you aren't smart," and everyone pretending to get it.

It's actually just shit and yes a 5 year old could do it. Actually use your brain and look at some of Pollock's "work" and try and find a way to call that art.

very orientarrrr

Really, good, but next time don't press so hard when you're drawing. The pencil creates indentations in the paper and when you color over it, it leaves those white lines which look horrible. Keep it up. Hope to see more.

This is ass

Oh, fuk u guys then. You act like i need to improve when im alredy perfect. screw off, ur jest haters