Archived threads in /ic/ - Artwork/Critique - 457. page

pls reply artists

>>2875565
More info. What kind of artists do you want to work with? What kind of work do you need from them?

>>2875639
i'm not very informed on all the types of artists there are so i'm not sure how to answer that. but preferably one that uses illustrator and makes vectors.

>>2872081
Post your work.

File: IMG_2948.jpg (39KB, 373x288px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 373x288px

>>2872093
There's no point in posting it.

It's shit, man.

File: NAZEDA.jpg (155KB, 1354x2196px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1354x2196px

>>2872081
Me too OP me too

I just want to draw cute anime girls!

But I can't!

Let me see your cute anime girls!

Sculptures are not allowed in LAS Saucy

File: il_fullxfull.942134074_q4mn[1].jpg (438KB, 1370x1500px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 1370x1500px

What did I think of this?

>>2875450
Are these yours? There quite nice.

>>2875637
Holy shit yet

http://www.ebay.com/itm/133pc-Deluxe-Artist-Painting-Set-Aluminum-Easel-Wood-Table-Easel-Paint-Canvas-/191800063949?_trksid=p2141725.m3641.l6368

look at what I found!!!!!!!!

File: 01755-3129-3ww-l.jpg (140KB, 518x600px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 518x600px

>>2875637
Why do you want three different types of paint?
If you are a beginner, you should stick to learning one type for now before you spend money buying things you might never use.
R&L paints are really cheap quality as well. They might not do the medium justice. Not to mention, the website is sketchy as hell.
You might be able to find mostly unused art kits like this on craigslist with better paints.

The worst thing for a beginner is getting sucked into hoarding art supplies.
Just choose one type of paint, buy a reasonably priced student quality paint, a couple of brushes, paper, and palette.
Actually, for less than the price of the kit, you could buy a box of 12 professional quality watercolor pans (\>$60)
>http://www.dickblick.com/products/sennelier-french-artists-watercolor-sets/#description

That leaves you with plenty of money leftover to spend on paper and brushes.

Other nice sets:
>http://www.dickblick.com/products/yarka-st-petersburg-professional-watercolor-pans/#description

would make for a cool album cover

>>2875520
Very cool and groovy colors/style. Got a blog?

Yeah brother love the style, it's like some sports drink ad for necromancers

>>2872975

You won't have much to worry about if you do much of anything creative. People who draw shiny knights and battle robots hoping to be a video game designer though are probably fucked within 20-25 years.

>>2872975
Any more background info on the image?

>>2873020
all the OP said was that it was made with this app.

https://dreamscopeapp.com/

She is just an ugly woman with crappy art who is loved by art student alternative chicks because she was a feminist who didn't pluck her eyebrowse and used make up to make her monobrow look stronger.

>>2868766
/thread

epidemy of mexicunt basic bitches

>>2875578
Because this place is full of clueless noobs repeating retarded memes. Still one of the best art boards on the interwebs though.

>>2875578

It's a good book that hammers concepts to complete beginners. And even then nearly everyone makes it a point to tell beginners to ignore the pseudoscience and just focus on the art shit.

>>2875578
You are confusing a conceptual model with scientific explanation. The "R-Mode" and "L-Mode" ideas are conceptual models, not attempts at trying to pinpoint exactly what parts of the brain do what. That is frankly irrelevant.

What is relevant is that "R-Mode" is how you're meant to be drawing. It is the kind of thinking that produces accurate reproductions. "L-Mode" is more analogous to your day-to-day logical thinking, but doesn't produce good work, it produces symbol drawing.

It is recommended because it works. The exercises in it work, the premise of the book earned the author a doctorate, and in general there is a great deal of empirical evidence that what produces good drawing is different than the kind of thinking you have day-to-day.

I admit that the book is very long winded at times and seems too hung up on explaining things with physiology, but I also think that without these explanations some of the exercises would seem nonsensical and hard for people to justify risking wasting their time on. People need to be convinced there is a method to the madness for it to work.

Some people would recommend skipping it and doing Keys to Drawing Instead. I don't think there's anything necessarily wrong with that but I'd personally recommend keeping with DoTRSotB at least until it turns into a portrait drawing book, because by that time the core techniques it has to teach, and why they work, have been taught. Especially for complete 0-experience beginners

Some people really seem to want to bury this book because "le-psuedo science" (again, this is a problem of reading comprehension. It's a book that presents a conceptual model, not a book on neuroscience) but it's helped a lot of people drawing, myself included, and I think it's worth any beginner's consideration.

>>2875564
like this looks pretty promising:

http://willkempartschool.com/new-start-here/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWQ1S1YwkI0

This william kemp guy

>>2875571
Here's a few paid lessons:


https://www.artistsnetworkuniversity.com/catalog?label=Courses%20by%20Level&value=Beginner

https://www.craftsy.com/art/shop/painting-classes?filters=%7B%22selectedFilters%22%3A%5B%22%7B%5C%22filterSetId%5C%22%3A363%2C%5C%22facetName%5C%22%3A%5C%22skillLevel%5C%22%2C%5C%22filterOptionId%5C%22%3A%5C%222843%5C%22%7D%22%5D%2C%22selectedSearchScopes%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22sortBy%22%3A%22relevant%22%2C%22page%22%3A1%2C%22contentType%22%3A%22filter-gallery%2Fcontent%2Fkeyed%22%7D&showEnrolledClasses=false

Anybody have anything

File: no i.jpg (950KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

950KB, 3000x3000px

decided, fuck /gd/ that place is useless

so direct from >>>/lit/9156961
I wrote up pic related.

Now /ic/ can you make a picture for this poem?

if you aren't particularly enchanted I will keep going with more poems

>>2875128
maybe he does them from life?

>>2875133

Look at the youtube clip, it's a studio painting.

>>2875128
It's literally just a step above Bob Ross art. He could very well be making it up, but if that's the case then he has studied photos a ton in the past because it has a lot of the shitty hallmarks of a piece blindly copied from a photo.

>>2872547
wheres the "great" work? op you lied to me. this shit is just plain bad.

>>2872547

This person is almost certainly working (heavily) from reference. Probably even a photograph. Most photorealists did even back in the 70s when it was the new hip thing.

You can do this too if you work hard enough, practice enough, and have enough patience. It's not unimpressive but it's not "great work", it's a worthless copy of a bag of m&ms. The work is only impressive for its skill. Skill can be acquired by many people, not to put it down, but drawing something like this is just exhibitionism

>>2872550
Lol. I dont think copying is great either, but it still takes a lot of skill. Im 100% certain that you couldnt recreate this.

Myself

File: 03_sketches_from_the_meatbag_by_bobmeatbag-d6hrk28.jpg (1MB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x900px

>>2867014
I love Bobmeatbag's style. His drawings always have so much personality on them and I really like the grotesque factor many of them have. Also, he is a pretty cool guy.

>>2867876
fuck, I thought it meant artists in general, not /ic/ exclusive ones. oh well

you're welcome

>>2875227
NGMI