Archived threads in /ic/ - Artwork/Critique - 1014. page

>>2487119
im sure adobe will be willing to help since you're paying so much for their product :^)

I'm glad you found the troubleshooting board though.

>>2487122
What are the best settings for the magic wand in SAI?

check the catalog man
>>2483094

>>2486982
Thanks my man

File: 2015-06-01-splatoon.jpg (566KB, 1000x1414px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 1000x1414px

>>2486824
I ment Scan*

And here is the pic I used for reference

File: 1460321144333.png (32KB, 500x479px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x479px

>>2486827
>Shadman

Head shape's kinda wonky, but overall pretty decent

Obligatory Loomis

>>2486833
Thanks I posted in a draw thread on /b/ but then I remember it's /b/

L'internet Français est très pauvre, comme pour la plupart des choses si tu veux de la qualité tu t'en éloignes. Jamais regardé une seule vidéo en Français concernant l'art.

Mais tu peux toujours jeter un oeil, qui sait.

>>2486536

sad, and I just assumed I was bad at knowing the phrases or words to use to search

Look up the famous artist school

>>2486355
I looked at it in portrait view and it looks like a smurf about to get some head by some bitch and she is in the shadows. Also... Either practice every day or quit cause you suck bro. Also... I realize this is probably bait but fuck it.

>>2486355
why did you make this thread

I really like this, it's obvious that a lot of heart and thought was put into it. There is something so awe-inspiring yet nostalgic about the emptiness of the white space to the right of the piece, a metaphor for the uncertainty that beholds us in our lives everyday. This of course is contrasted by the aggressive gesture of the wave that approaches - uh oh! All in all, great job, I'd love to see this in a museum, gallery, or anything of the like. Keep producing!

>>2486305
kys

>>2486305
no thanks

That creature looks really shocked, like a few of those small tubular fish swam up its butt. I like the texture on the shell. Composition is a bit dull though.

It looks like someone just flattened a 90s paper cup.

>>2487315
ty

>>2486177

You may be inadvertently holding shift?

>>2486518

He's not, I've had the same issue though sadly I forget how I fixed it.

Have you tried reinstalling your drivers? And does this happen only in photoshop (or whatever program you use) or various drawing softwares?

Also you'll probably get shit on for not using the question thread.

>>2486518
I had a Cintiq 12WX that did this. It's definitely not him. You might be able to solve the problem by sending it back to Wacom. My solution was to bury it in a storage unit and never use it again.

>>2486110
Looks like a shitty pencil drawing that someone laid textures over in photoshop.

i dig that

what is image search

lord and savior brian?

>>2486002
If the basics are what you're missing you should spend a huge amount of time drawing either egg-headed ratmen or just basic forms and shapes (spheres, cubes, ellipses etc.) in space which is the same shit. Loomis just assumed people would find the former less boring.
Since you didn't post anything I assume your drawings are bad enough that you have pretty much 0 basics so yeah.

>>2486002

"Fun with Pencil" is worst Loomis book. Seriously, you should go to beginner thread or lurk a bit more since questions like that are asked nearly daily.

Actual beginner's books should be Dodson "Keys to Drawing", "Perspective made Easy", "How to Draw" by Scott Robertson + supplement it with drawabox.com and Proko videos.

Proko is ok because he distills in his max 10 minute videos a lot of knowledge, also from Loomis.

If you really want to go Loomis route, start with "Drawing Heads and Hands".

Also - a lot of knowledge here is basic. It also means that you probably lack most of it. If you really are think you are skilled painter/artist, then what you need is analyzing where you lack and what you want to improve. Usually bad form and construction is responsible for lots of mistakes. There's lineweight problems though also. In painting Richard Schmid puts a very big emphasis on controlling your edges and colors. Especially edges.

>>2486002
>I don't really want to draw egg-headed ratmen for the next week to be honest.

Then don't. I've never read fun with a pencil, but the very page you posted says "If your shapes do not match mine it doesn't matter, any shape will do. Get the working principle"

This seems to be a great exercise to just get a basic feeling for shape design, get your creativity going, have fun and learn about 3D forms. Don't copy his rat men, but draw whatever shapes you think would look cool as faces. If you have absolutely zero interest in shape design and stylization, then skip this and move on to whatever book teaches you about the stuff you are interested in. It's not like reading a book is a commitment that forces you to stay on one chapter for a week+.

>>/b/

1/10 low quality ytp

>>2487606

stop bumping this crap faggot