>>939229 That video is hot op, but nothing happens and it's boring. But the majority of these videos are. http://www.boyester.com/videos/1025/two-horny-18yo-teens-get-naked-and-jerk-on-skype-together-for-a-girl/?pqr=45:ca02e299655209f5097abfd1528e3e5b:0:1025:2
>>939229 >http://www.boyester.com/videos/1302/hung-18yo-webcam-buddies-jerking-off-together/?pqr=9:ca02e299655209f5097abfd1528e3e5b:0:1302:5 I love when they look at each other's dick, so much sexual tension
>>939467 >http://www.boyester.com/videos/1302/hung-18yo-webcam-buddies-jerking-off-together/?pqr=9:ca02e299655209f5097abfd1528e3e5b:0:1302:5 I was pretty scared when I see he face of the first guy, I though it was pedophilia or something
The audio really makes this one Some highlights: Friend says "this is really fucking weird" at the beginning 4.40 Guy jerking off puts his hands behind his head and fucks the air (another "this is really fucking weird" from his friend) 6.30 "Damn dude, you got bigger all of a sudden. Holy fuck" Then he cums "EWWW DUDE HE JUST CAME"
>>939886 it has frank wolf's cam shows which hand been almost impossible to find since he killed himself because of his family asking websites to remove it but they didn't so you could say they're sketchy
>>940757 there are definitely guys younger than 18 on that site but i've never seen anything that looked real outlandish. occasionally when there's a video with guys who look around 14/15 it's almost always amateur/webcam, doesn't look like they were put up to it
>>939886 Wow, I've been to this site countless times but never clicked on any of those links. I clicked on 'FAQ' and it says "BLAH BLAH BLAH". The rest of the links are just as useless. So sketchy. But damn, they have some of the best amateur stuff around.
>>940235 not too sure about doing it on camera, but it's just horny teenagers screwing around. A friend and I used to mess around like this (no webcam involved, just the two of us, his bedroom, his computer of porn). Not too sure why he was into it, I was into it because I'm not straight and was getting my dick sucked by my friend. I lost touch with him, but I always suspected he was at least bi. He initiated everything, jerking off together, jerking each other off, sucking, and we even tried rimming once when he started licking my asshole while we were 69ing and I just went with it.
>>945074 Is it removed? When I try to download, itg redirects to http://dl/15bfc670/53f4cbba/0/55a773//19470790/8sHkL6/e915af2a77259c1382a500857d3166293863f617/1408490924485.zip which is a broken link.
>>945459 You're an idiot. They're attracted to anyone with smooth, childlike bodies. It doesn't matter if they're prepubescent or not. That's why twink porn is even a thing, because pedophiles/dumb teenage girls eat that shit up.
>>945545 I think you should look up what pedophile actually means. It has a very specific definition. Pedophiles may find twinks slightly more attractive than more masculine males but they still wouldn't like them very much. Twinks look young but they don't look prepubescent. Even the best twinks only look 14/15.
>>946029 They are real medical terms used by psychologists. Seriously look them up.
Also you do know the age of consent changes and is different in different places right? Someone who is underage age in one country might be legal in another. The law changes. By your logic it's okay to have sex with a 12 year old in Angola but not okay to have sex with a 19 year old in Tunisia. Paraphilias are psychological not legal concepts. If you seriously think you know better than all the worlds’ experts I suggest you write your thoughts down and submit them to an academic journal.
The definition of a word does not change because you want it to or because it makes you uncomfortable. You are a self-righteous idiot of the worst kind.
>>946029 Also the distinction is not between teens and preteens. It is between prepubescents and pubescents. People begin puberty at different times and it lasts different amounts of time for different people. Age is a very vague indicator of physical and mental maturity. It gives a general idea but it is within the normal range to begin puberty from 8-14. A person’s exact age is irrelevant, whether or not they have started puberty is what makes the difference.
The fact that I even have to tell you this is ridiculous. Seriously just do some cursory research so you don’t make such a fool of yourself again.
>>946030 You clearly missed the point, I'm not saying the terms don't exist, I'm saying that you are trying to justify being attracted to people who not only aren't an age to give proper consent, but aren't even properly developed, any "psychologist" will tell you that someone who preys on those too young to decide for themselves is immoral no matter their classification. Not that I'm suggesting anyone here has had sex with the people in the photos but I do not believe that lusting over someone who's 12 and hasn't hit puberty and someone who's 13 and has, is any different. I must have struck a nerve for you to turn civilized conversation into insult. You must be a pedophile. P.S. are you serious trying to balance your morals regarding sexual age of consent with third world countries that lack basic human rights? You truly are sick, and maybe should seek one of these "psychologists" you mentioned.
>>946507 The age of consent in Spain is 13 and it's 14 in Germany and Italy they are hardly third world countries.
>not only aren't an age to give proper consent
Which age is that exactly and why? People develop at different rates and the law is different depending on where you live. As far as I am concerned there is no one perfect age. People are simply too different for any generalization to be useful. I don't think all 16 year olds are ready for sex and I don't think all 13 year olds are either. What I think is that how mentally and physically mature a person is rather than their exact age should be more important.
You did strike a nerve. I remember when the age of consent for homosexuals was 21 here in the UK and philistines like you would defend it. The system as it is not perfect, reform is still necessary. To treat all people of one age as a homogenous group with the exact same level of mental and emotional and physical maturity is just absurd, individual differences must be accounted for. Especially as the currently punishments are so extreme.
there are 15 - 19 year olds which are looking for porn aswell and dont like old guys who easily could be their parents. I satrt to grow out of this twink stuff but in the past it was hard to get porn which turns you on when everybody looks at least 20 years old
>>946661 Again, under which age? It's not 18 or 16 everywhere. People can still be sexually confused as adults. I think actual maturity rather than specific age should be more important. I don't think it's morally right to have sex with a naive unready 16 year old and I do think it should be okay to have consensual sex with a 15 year old who is ready. Age is not the only factor. I won't break the law but I still think the law as it stands is illogical.
>>946671 That's also true of people aged 16-21 and in some cases even slightly higher. Not all teenagers are ready for sex but some are. There should be laws against taking advantage of people that does not necessitate such a rigid age of consent. It's easy to take advantage of 18 year olds that doesn't mean that 18 year olds shouldn't be allowed to have sex.
>>946507 >any "psychologist" will tell you that someone who preys on those too young to decide for themselves is immoral no matter their classification
As a psychologist with a specialization in human sexuality, I can tell you that this is blatantly false. Do not conflate legal and social norms with biological and psychological ones. There is a reason ephebophilia and hebephilia are not listed in the DSM: because it is not a disorder to be attracted to reproductively viable partners (i.e. anyone who has entered puberty). It just happens to be socially unacceptable in modern western cultures. Yes, there are valid reasons not to have sex with young teens, but these are not inherent to intergenerational relationships. The harm is a product of society's perception of the relationships.
Please don't speak on behalf of a profession you clearly know very little about.
>>946719 I was only joking. I followed the DSM V debates very closely. It surprised me that the views of most psychologists are completely different to the views of the general public in regards to intergenerational sex. I hope their views eventually go mainstream.
>>946721 As do I, clearly. It's very frustrating to have your life's work dismissed my people who can't even be bothered to read and understand it. Unfortunately we've got ill-informed rationalizers like Blanchard and Cantor giving some semblance of credibility to the opinions of the general public.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.