Are there any other historical figures who turned out to

>>72669

Addiction is not real, many historical figures used drugs we now consider "addictive" but simply did not have the culture of helplessness to justify their character weakness as a disease.

Sigmund Freud liked cocaine. Winston Churchill was an alky. That's all i can think of off the top of my head.

Was the shit he took really considerd as a drug at this time? Because i doubt this.
its like people look back at someone from our time and say: He smoked. he was a drug addict

>>73029
>Addiction is not real
....

By modern standards vast numbers of historical figures would be alcoholics. They used to drink booze all day, albeit it was weaker than today

>>73056
His doctor literally gave this man Meth.

File: 1390633086735.jpg (27KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 300x300px

>>73029
>Addiction is not real

>>74317
>>73079

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3314045/

"addiction" just means someone is weak-willed and prioritizes getting high over more important obligations

>>74178
The entire German and Italian armies was on meth, it was considered refreshing and healthy

>>74891
>doesn't meet specific criteria to be considered the same as other diseases in medical terminology
>therefore it doesn't exist
okay

>>75246

>it's fundamentally different from every disease

>but it's just special, still totes legit ^_^

junkies are just shitty people

>>75205
They had meth, but only in small doses. Morell gave Hitler a shit ton of excess meth in the form of Vitamultin (it was essentially meth on steroids) along with cocaine given through eyedrops which were 5-10 times stronger than the average dose.

Hitler was so fucked up the nigga was asleep during D-Day. You can't make this shit up