Anthropogenic Global Warming

>>37789
Please don't do this, especially with a post that belongs on >>>/sci/

>>37902
> 1800s Industrial Revolution

>>37357
You would be correct in that assertion.

>>37357
This isn't history related.
>>37988
This is not an excuse at all. It's like saying you can start a topic about the Big Bang by saying it happened 14 million years ago and thus is a part of history, to make an extreme example.

Pretty much, according to ice cores

Fun, but unrelated fact about ice cores: You can see a giant spike in lead content when leaded gasoline hit its peak followed by a quick drop in lead.
You know where else there's a lead peak (though not NEARLY as drastic)?
Roman times, when they were smelting lead for pipes

>>37988
History is the disciplinary study of the documentary records of the past.

in the 1970s people were saying that global cooling was happening. there may be climate change but it is hubris to say that man is causing it.

>>38128
It's hubris to go against scientific consensus when you probably barely even graduated high school and are oh so "smart but don't achieve because you're lazy".

File: 1430951220958.jpg (32KB, 400x462px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 400x462px

>>38128
>hubris to say that man is causing it
This argument is fucking retarded

Never before in Earth's history has this much carbon been released into the atmosphere this quickly.
The fastest previous carbon release took place over several thousand years, not several hundred.
The Earth simply can't release carbon that fast, it's absolutely our fault.

>>38073
iirc, the lead spike also had a lot to do with silver mining and refining when they conquered Spain.

>>37357
The current round, which is getting out of control, yes. But I recall Mongol conquests killing enough people to cool the climate.

>>38190
dem roadz falt!!!

>>40062
I don't even know what you're trying to say