Is WW2 the most plebbiest period in history? You always see double

I think cold war might be a little bit worse but yes either of the two

> world consumes itself in global war with at least four competing ideologies, to the death
> not interesting
How's being a contrarian teenager? I remember it well.

>>3395740
I'm not saying that it's not interesting, it is
It's just it brings the worst morons to the discussion, be it naziboo stormfags or tankie leftypol fags.
It's just irritating because every ww2 revolves around /pol/ faggotry, holocaust denial, what if Hitler did "insert something" here, etc.

File: 1504232707002.jpg (21KB, 481x406px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 481x406px

>>3395768
Pretty much this. Most WW2 threads devolve into either myth spouting or not taking into account huge factors.
>tfw no one to talk with about the Crimean front and the crazy shit that happened
Reading on the Crimean Front made me realise why the Jerries wanted that thing. It was a literal, unsinkable "Aircraft carrier" for the Soviets.

>>3395740
disagree, late 50s to early 70s is goat

>kennedy
>nixon
>vietnam
>Krushev

hnng

>>3395888
>Vietnam
Completely dumb conflict hyped up by Hollywood

>>3395876
>unsinkable "Aircraft carrier" in a purely land-based theatre

So like ... an airbase>

>>3395912
damn...