What does /his/ think of Graham Hancock's theories (about

>>278195
Yes. Those 12k year old cities were not planted there by aliens.

>>279117
>12k year old cities

Which? Gobekli Tepe isn't a city. He even argues that all the cities at that time were flooded by sea level rise and are now 400ft under water and that's why we don't have any significant remains of an ancient civilization.

>Was there an ancient civilization which got wiped out at the end of the last ice age?

Nope
</thread>

>>278195
I think they're a crying goddamn shame, because his first book, about the pyramids, is legit interesting and raises some good points, but you can't say that shit to people anymore now because he went full retard for the woobux.

>>278195
I would like see someone refute his points instead of the usual fallacies.

>>279573
Kill yourself you fucking retard.

>>282941
>refute his points
What points does he make?

File: doggerland2.jpg (722KB, 1962x2005px) Image search: [Google]

722KB, 1962x2005px

He makes really good points and some of the things he says are certainly plausible (there are absolutely gaps in the historical record and large amounts of history lost to geological change, pic related), but then he just loses himself to ridiculous new age pseudoscience garbage and insane conspiracy theories.

File: image.jpg (37KB, 446x456px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 446x456px

broooo mother ayahuasca 420 woah
but memes aside I really like him but his open drug use really discredits him

>>283177
Only to authoritarians.

>>283059
He claims for instance that there are certains patterns on the sphinx I think that could only be created through heavy rainfall, and that this might be an indicator for it being older than previously thought.