Where does Evola get the basis of [traditional values]? Do we

>>276033
His own brain, just like any philosopher.

I know for you relgiousfags it's hard to grasp this concept, but human beings can make up their own ideas without some imaginary influence from the skies.

>>276049

buttmad atheshit spotted

>>276049
>Implying I'm not an atheist.
>Implying the absence of an objective dispenser of value doesn't mean the shit Evola rails against has equal value to the values he espouses: zer0.

I get that he pre-packs a sample of these make-your-own values, but I don't find a compelling argument on why I should buy what he's selling other than I /like/ it.

>>276072
There's no real ''compelling argument'' for any philsophy, you just agree with it depending on your morals and that's it.

>>276078
Yeah but, why should we select these [traditional values] and not some other [values]?

>>276101
I told you, it depends on your morals.

>>276104
How is any of this transcendent or sacred then?

>>276120
It's not.
Religion lol!

>>276128
>It's not

But Evola said they are.

>>276132
He was a religiousfag, he believed his morals and ideas were influenced by God or some other stupid shit like that.
Doesn't change the fact that you can agree with his philosophy if you want.

>>276140
>From God

You could've said that in the first place instead of whining about religion. Though I'm an atheist too, I'm willing to accept that answer.

>>276033

Rene Guenon and his own interpretation of a ton of different religious and esoteric texts. You can say what you will about has actual capabilities as a scholar, but he definitely read widely and had gone through most of the world's spiritual traditions in some detail.

Just read through his bibliographies, you'll find a very wide variety of texts. He basically has an idiosyncratic fusion of all of them mixed in with his own experience of esoteric practice.