OFFICIAL HISTORICAL AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTY POWER RANKINGS

>>257427

>Democratic-Republican Party

I think you mean Federalists, my man.

>>257457
11. Federalist Party

So your favourite parties are nativist, anti-immigrant parties, followed immediately by the internationalist SPA, comprised largely of immigrants?

>>257546
I'm referring to the SPA's early years when Debs was their candidate. They were pretty much populists at that point and had a mostly native American membership. The party changed dramatically after WW1.

>In the first decades of the 20th century, it drew significant support from many different groups, including trade unionists, progressive social reformers, populist farmers, and immigrant communities.

>>257578
It was an internationalist and Marxist party from day one. Especially with Debs in charge, he went to jail for opposing ww1. They always had a close relationship with the IWW which was heavily made up of immigrants.

>>257427

Sorry, but by any objective measure the Republicans top the list. The defeat of slavery was by far the most significant thing the Americans ever did.

>>257609
Not really tbqhwy. Was the abolition of slavery the most significant thing the British Empire ever did? France?

3%. Libertarian Party

File: DeWitt_Clinton_Engraved_Portrait.jpg (2MB, 1326x1630px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1326x1630px

>Not putting the Federalist Party as number 1
>Being this much of a faggot
>mfw

>>257427
>Know-Nothings and Socialists two tanks away from each other.

>no progressive party

Did you just take all the historical and obscure parties and put them in random order, then add a anti-modern quip?

>>259496
That was a pretty interesting meeting from what I understood.
Didn't they agree that nationalism was good for both, because it kept them each pure?

>>259925
Populists > Progressives

File: AC.jpg (151KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1000x1000px

>>257427
>being American
>being anti-immigrant

>>260081
>implying Native Americans weren't genocided by immigrants

I don't get why leftists use this argument. The example of American Indians literally supports the argument that immigration is bad for the host nation/people.

>>257427

>Putting the know-nothings above anything

Literally what was good about them? They existed for barely a decade, based their agenda around a wedge issue, and accomplished nothing.

>>260132
So did the Free Soilers but no one ever says anything bad about them.

>Anti-Masonic Party
>Literally founded to combat a bogeyman

>>257427
>no Bull Moose Party
muh teddy...

>>261969
I actually forgot about that one since it was so ineffectual.

File: 190qxjgphytnfjpg.jpg (49KB, 800x445px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 800x445px

>>261969
Came to post this

File: Poster3.png (3MB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1600x1600px

>>257427
ay agree

It looks like meme politics in America is not just a 21st century phenomenon.

>>259940
Yes. Some al Sharpton character got up and said "DEEZ NAZIS GOT UP AND MARCHED AROUND AFRICA KILLING UR BRUTHA AND SISTAS OOGA BOOGA", and then Elijia got up and said "no that shits wrong. This man preached the same thing I do. Clap for him".
GLR also gave Malcom X 20 dollas

>>257427
>Anti-Masonic Party
>2.
>Socialist Party
>in the top ten
Your list is bad, and you should feel bad.

>>257578
Nope, it was largely supported by immigrants even before WW1.

>>259940
Keep the cream out of the coffee

>>257427
>Native Americans beware of foreign influence.

Dontcha think that is a teensy bit too late?

>>260092
It's more of a "you whities get what you deserve" argument.

>>257622
For the British Empire I would argue yes. It set in motion real abolition across the globe, and helped move Europe into the new Imperialism and the scramble for Africa.

>No Bull Moose Party

shiggy diggy

>no Ross Perot party